Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. /e/ and Murena have been been promoting their products by misleading people about GrapheneOS for years.

/e/ and Murena have been been promoting their products by misleading people about GrapheneOS for years.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
45 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    @tastyraspberry Replies to articles and posts are seen by far fewer than the original. The authors of these can also stop us from replying to them. It doesn't do much to address it and isn't an adequate approach. Our timeline reaches far more people and does far more to address these claims. They're posting about it in their main timelines and reaching large audiences of people who are being misled. Our users and supporters can post more about GrapheneOS and help defend the project too.

    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grapheneos@grapheneos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @tastyraspberry Our posts are having the intended effect of addressing the inaccurate claims. We're aware it results in /e/ and Murena doubling down on attacks. We're also aware that it results in their supporters doubling down on attacks. These will be addressed with additional posts. They're on a sinking ship and they're misleading people about GrapheneOS far more desperately than they ever have before because of it. They do not have substance and they're losing the more they do this.

    tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • niavy@masto.bikeN niavy@masto.bike

      @GrapheneOS
      STOP BASHING OTHER ALTERNATIVE ANDROID ROMS

      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapheneos@grapheneos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @niavy These threads are a direct response to attacks on our project and exist to address the inaccurate claims made about the GrapheneOS project and our team. We're defending ourselves from /e/ and Murena along with their supporters continuing to mislead people about GrapheneOS.

      We're going to address the fact that their supporters use the tactic of portraying our threads addressing their inaccurate claims to falsely present us as the aggressor. It's another of their inaccurate talking points.

      niavy@masto.bikeN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP This user is from outside of this forum
        phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP This user is from outside of this forum
        phil_stevens@mastodon.nz
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @lina @GrapheneOS How well do you understand the role of Google in the ecosystem of Android alternatives?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • niavy@masto.bikeN niavy@masto.bike

          @GrapheneOS
          STOP BASHING OTHER ALTERNATIVE ANDROID ROMS

          hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
          hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
          hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @niavy @GrapheneOS

          Youre telling the wrong android project this. GOS hasnt bashed anyone.

          niavy@masto.bikeN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT tastyraspberry@mastodon.online

            @GrapheneOS It's great you're taking time to clear up factually incorrect claims, whether they're made out of maliciousness or naivety. Constructive community engagement is great!

            But please, for the love of god, this information only belongs A) in the threads where factually incorrect claims are being made and B) on your website in the FAQ section.

            I know it's not intuitive, but pushing conflict into everyone's face again and again makes your project seem *less* trustworthy, not more.

            hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
            hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
            hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @tastyraspberry @GrapheneOS

            Those who spread misinfo make individual posts and shove it in peoples faces. GOS is allowed to make posts about topics that pertain to them, especially if they are to point out harm and abuse.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

              There's a comparison between operating systems based on the Android Open Source Project at https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm which provides a good overview of how GrapheneOS compares to other options. GrapheneOS is clearly a privacy project and is a major innovator in privacy protections.

              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              grapheneos@grapheneos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              GrapheneOS has an extremely high level of app compatibility. Nearly every Android app can be used on it which is crucial for broad usability. A tiny subset of Android apps banning using an alternate OS which we haven't yet worked around or convinced to allow it are incompatible.

              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @lina Google Pay bans using alternative operating systems which aren't certified by Google as part of licensing Google Mobile Services. There are working tap-to-pay options available for GrapheneOS. We don't know where you live but Curve Pay is available in the UK and European Economic Area. PayPal has tap-to-pay in Germany. A bunch of banks in European countries support tap-to-pay via a standard predating the widespread adoption of Google Pay. Banks dropping that for Google Pay has slowed down.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • niavy@masto.bikeN niavy@masto.bike

                  @GrapheneOS
                  Look, I am following both. GrapheneOS AND /e/.
                  I've NEVER read GrapheneOS-bashing logorrhea like yours towards main LineageOS-based ROMs.

                  Really, stop victimising yourself and start acknowledging that every Google-shipped alternative ROM is a step towards better. Let users pick what they want.

                  niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                  niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                  niavy@masto.bike
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @GrapheneOS
                  As for me, I chose to degoogle my life BUT to a certain extent only. I will not get rid of my Chromecast, neither of my unlimited Google Photos. I know there may be better choices, but these are mine. My LineageOS-based ROM is cool for me. Your ROM may be a better choice, but STOP criticising other ones. This is COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.

                  hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                    @niavy These threads are a direct response to attacks on our project and exist to address the inaccurate claims made about the GrapheneOS project and our team. We're defending ourselves from /e/ and Murena along with their supporters continuing to mislead people about GrapheneOS.

                    We're going to address the fact that their supporters use the tactic of portraying our threads addressing their inaccurate claims to falsely present us as the aggressor. It's another of their inaccurate talking points.

                    niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                    niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                    niavy@masto.bike
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @GrapheneOS
                    Look, I am following both. GrapheneOS AND /e/.
                    I've NEVER read GrapheneOS-bashing logorrhea like yours towards main LineageOS-based ROMs.

                    Really, stop victimising yourself and start acknowledging that every Google-shipped alternative ROM is a step towards better. Let users pick what they want.

                    niavy@masto.bikeN hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH xtreix@infosec.exchangeX 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange

                      @niavy @GrapheneOS

                      Youre telling the wrong android project this. GOS hasnt bashed anyone.

                      niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                      niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                      niavy@masto.bike
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @HybridStaticAnimate
                      😆
                      @GrapheneOS

                      hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • niavy@masto.bikeN niavy@masto.bike

                        @HybridStaticAnimate
                        😆
                        @GrapheneOS

                        hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @niavy @GrapheneOS

                        ...Huh?

                        niavy@masto.bikeN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                          GrapheneOS has an extremely high level of app compatibility. Nearly every Android app can be used on it which is crucial for broad usability. A tiny subset of Android apps banning using an alternate OS which we haven't yet worked around or convinced to allow it are incompatible.

                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          Our primary focus is improving the usability and out-of-the-box experience of GrapheneOS. We're continuing to add own privacy and security focused implementations of functionality normally provided by Google apps/services. The user-facing apps are being overhauled and replaced.

                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange

                            @niavy @GrapheneOS

                            ...Huh?

                            niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                            niavy@masto.bikeN This user is from outside of this forum
                            niavy@masto.bike
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @HybridStaticAnimate
                            "GrapheneOS hasn't bashed anyone" BWAHAHAHA 🤣

                            They did more than once.
                            @GrapheneOS

                            hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                              Our primary focus is improving the usability and out-of-the-box experience of GrapheneOS. We're continuing to add own privacy and security focused implementations of functionality normally provided by Google apps/services. The user-facing apps are being overhauled and replaced.

                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              We already shipped our own network-based location and geocoding implementations which we'll be making more discoverable. Our high quality local text-to-speech implementation is shipping soon and we'll also be providing a local speech-to-text implementation. A lot more is coming.

                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP This user is from outside of this forum
                                phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP This user is from outside of this forum
                                phil_stevens@mastodon.nz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @lina @GrapheneOS It's not a tenable proposition for a disruptive upstart...we see examples all over the place of Big Tech shutting accounts of projects that are deemed threats to their hegemony.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • niavy@masto.bikeN niavy@masto.bike

                                  @HybridStaticAnimate
                                  "GrapheneOS hasn't bashed anyone" BWAHAHAHA 🤣

                                  They did more than once.
                                  @GrapheneOS

                                  hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @niavy @GrapheneOS

                                  No, they havent. You havent been reading anything thats been going on if thats the conclusion you came to. They defend themselves. Why dont you direct your comments to the groups actually bashing other android projects? They keep initiating these attacks and GOS is retaliating defensively. Not the other way around. The evidence of this has been posted numerous times.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                    We already shipped our own network-based location and geocoding implementations which we'll be making more discoverable. Our high quality local text-to-speech implementation is shipping soon and we'll also be providing a local speech-to-text implementation. A lot more is coming.

                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    /e/ bundles many privacy invasive apps/services. That includes adding a bunch of Google services not present in AOSP with privileged access. They implement speech-to-text by sending user data to OpenAI without informing users about it. We cannot do that.

                                    GrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social)

                                    Apple and Google both provide support for offline speech-to-text using local models. Users can configure it to be fully offline. The Murena Voice to Text service in /e/OS sends the user's audio to OpenAI which is hidden away in their terms of service: https://community.e.foundation/t/voice-to-text-feature-using-open-ai/70509

                                    favicon

                                    GrapheneOS Mastodon (grapheneos.social)

                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                      @tastyraspberry Our posts are having the intended effect of addressing the inaccurate claims. We're aware it results in /e/ and Murena doubling down on attacks. We're also aware that it results in their supporters doubling down on attacks. These will be addressed with additional posts. They're on a sinking ship and they're misleading people about GrapheneOS far more desperately than they ever have before because of it. They do not have substance and they're losing the more they do this.

                                      tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tastyraspberry@mastodon.online
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @GrapheneOS
                                      > We're aware it results in /e/ and Murena doubling down on attacks. We're also aware that it results in their supporters doubling down on attacks. These will be addressed with additional posts.

                                      I.. don't know if attempting to fight fire with fire is a reasonable investment of the team's time. It's not your goal to find every instance of a false claim to debunk it, right?

                                      tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT tastyraspberry@mastodon.online

                                        @GrapheneOS
                                        > We're aware it results in /e/ and Murena doubling down on attacks. We're also aware that it results in their supporters doubling down on attacks. These will be addressed with additional posts.

                                        I.. don't know if attempting to fight fire with fire is a reasonable investment of the team's time. It's not your goal to find every instance of a false claim to debunk it, right?

                                        tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tastyraspberry@mastodon.online
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @GrapheneOS Most other organizations (Wikipedia, Signal..) respond to FUD or backlash by making a blog post. This is then shared by the org a few times on their socials, and community members will of course also use it to counter FUD/backlash in the relevant threads.

                                        tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT tastyraspberry@mastodon.online

                                          @GrapheneOS Most other organizations (Wikipedia, Signal..) respond to FUD or backlash by making a blog post. This is then shared by the org a few times on their socials, and community members will of course also use it to counter FUD/backlash in the relevant threads.

                                          tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tastyraspberry@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tastyraspberry@mastodon.online
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @GrapheneOS If you must reply to individual threads yourself, you could probably save lots of time by having an evergreen section on your website dedicated to debunking FUD and just linking to that. There's little point in formulating individual responses on very similar topics repeatedly. Either a person is open to look at new information without prejudice, or they're not.

                                          You have more important work to do.. and you know it 😛

                                          Not trying to be harsh, I want you guys to succeed!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups