Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Now for the James Comey travesty undertaken by DOJ for the 2nd (more?) time:

Now for the James Comey travesty undertaken by DOJ for the 2nd (more?) time:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
jamescomey
9 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
    ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
    ginaintheburg@mastodon.world
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Now for the James Comey travesty undertaken by DOJ for the 2nd (more?) time:

    Oh, SFTU…

    "8647" - You're indicting #JamesComey on an effing semantic argument?

    Brianna Keilar/#CNN correctly pts out, it doesn't mean kill Trump. When you 86 a resto order, you don't kill the food. You rescind the order.

    And it's doubtless what Comey meant: impeach & remove 47. Or 25th Amendment him.

    Not to mention that just b/c "86" in common parlance is interpretted as "killing" s/thing like a resto order,
    1

    Link Preview Image
    ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG ginaintheburg@mastodon.world

      Now for the James Comey travesty undertaken by DOJ for the 2nd (more?) time:

      Oh, SFTU…

      "8647" - You're indicting #JamesComey on an effing semantic argument?

      Brianna Keilar/#CNN correctly pts out, it doesn't mean kill Trump. When you 86 a resto order, you don't kill the food. You rescind the order.

      And it's doubtless what Comey meant: impeach & remove 47. Or 25th Amendment him.

      Not to mention that just b/c "86" in common parlance is interpretted as "killing" s/thing like a resto order,
      1

      Link Preview Image
      ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
      ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
      ginaintheburg@mastodon.world
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      is no compelling argument, legal or otherwise.

      English is an imprecise language: the same word can have diff meanings.

      Like "killing" a bill - that doesn't mean killing the ppl who proposed or supported it. Or is that what you actually mean, Speaker Mike Johnson?

      And this archaic reference to the origin of the term "86" as meaning "8 miles out & 6 feet deep" is not, as the #GOP spokeswoman who dredged it up, common knowledge. Never heard it myself before.

      Plus that's urban myth, not its
      2

      Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
      ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG ginaintheburg@mastodon.world

        is no compelling argument, legal or otherwise.

        English is an imprecise language: the same word can have diff meanings.

        Like "killing" a bill - that doesn't mean killing the ppl who proposed or supported it. Or is that what you actually mean, Speaker Mike Johnson?

        And this archaic reference to the origin of the term "86" as meaning "8 miles out & 6 feet deep" is not, as the #GOP spokeswoman who dredged it up, common knowledge. Never heard it myself before.

        Plus that's urban myth, not its
        2

        Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
        ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
        ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
        ginaintheburg@mastodon.world
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        real origin: it's more likely 1930s soda jerk lingo for "out of" or the address of a 1920s speakeasy or even electrical code.

        Leave #JamesComey alone.

        You're just wasting yet more taxpayer money with another in your looooong list of stupid, obviously frivolous, vindictive lawsuits.
        https://www.google.com/search?q=when+did+the+term+86+originate+as+meaning+8+miles+it+and+6+feet+deep&oq=when+did+the+term+86+originate+as+meaning+8+miles+it+and+6+feet+deep+&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTI3NDY1ajBqOagCDrACAfEFWBsK9_FKkQbxBVgbCvfxSpEG&client=ms-android-att-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#lfId=ChxjMe
        3

        Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
        kratzen@berg.mobilecourant.orgK ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG ginaintheburg@mastodon.world

          real origin: it's more likely 1930s soda jerk lingo for "out of" or the address of a 1920s speakeasy or even electrical code.

          Leave #JamesComey alone.

          You're just wasting yet more taxpayer money with another in your looooong list of stupid, obviously frivolous, vindictive lawsuits.
          https://www.google.com/search?q=when+did+the+term+86+originate+as+meaning+8+miles+it+and+6+feet+deep&oq=when+did+the+term+86+originate+as+meaning+8+miles+it+and+6+feet+deep+&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTI3NDY1ajBqOagCDrACAfEFWBsK9_FKkQbxBVgbCvfxSpEG&client=ms-android-att-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#lfId=ChxjMe
          3

          Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
          kratzen@berg.mobilecourant.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
          kratzen@berg.mobilecourant.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
          kratzen@berg.mobilecourant.org
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          @ginaintheburg@mastodon.world more likely to be the rhyming slang theory. 86 = nix. And to 'nix' something it tends to mean remove. "Nix the attitude, buster" "The customer wants to nix the tomato" and in some cases when referring to a person, for example, "Nix the guy in the blue shirt" wouldn't mean taking the guy in the blue shirt out back like ol' yeller... it's just like "get the guy in the blue shirt out of the way"
          i_give_u_worms@beige.partyI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kratzen@berg.mobilecourant.orgK kratzen@berg.mobilecourant.org
            @ginaintheburg@mastodon.world more likely to be the rhyming slang theory. 86 = nix. And to 'nix' something it tends to mean remove. "Nix the attitude, buster" "The customer wants to nix the tomato" and in some cases when referring to a person, for example, "Nix the guy in the blue shirt" wouldn't mean taking the guy in the blue shirt out back like ol' yeller... it's just like "get the guy in the blue shirt out of the way"
            i_give_u_worms@beige.partyI This user is from outside of this forum
            i_give_u_worms@beige.partyI This user is from outside of this forum
            i_give_u_worms@beige.party
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @kratzen @ginaintheburg
            In this example I want to stress the tomato is simply used on a different sandwich

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG ginaintheburg@mastodon.world

              real origin: it's more likely 1930s soda jerk lingo for "out of" or the address of a 1920s speakeasy or even electrical code.

              Leave #JamesComey alone.

              You're just wasting yet more taxpayer money with another in your looooong list of stupid, obviously frivolous, vindictive lawsuits.
              https://www.google.com/search?q=when+did+the+term+86+originate+as+meaning+8+miles+it+and+6+feet+deep&oq=when+did+the+term+86+originate+as+meaning+8+miles+it+and+6+feet+deep+&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTI3NDY1ajBqOagCDrACAfEFWBsK9_FKkQbxBVgbCvfxSpEG&client=ms-android-att-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#lfId=ChxjMe
              3

              Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
              ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
              ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
              ginaintheburg@mastodon.world
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              BREAKING

              Erin Burnett/CNN: word is that an arrest warrant has been issued for James Comey.

              Un-effing real. What a travesty of justice. Esp, as Erin Burnett points out, during the Biden administration, "8646" was a #GOP thing, even appearing on tshirts & hats still for sale on Amazon.

              Y'all gonna arrest & prosecute those folks for calling for Biden's assassination?

              Still waiting...

              Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
              cynblogger@sfba.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              0
              • ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG ginaintheburg@mastodon.world

                BREAKING

                Erin Burnett/CNN: word is that an arrest warrant has been issued for James Comey.

                Un-effing real. What a travesty of justice. Esp, as Erin Burnett points out, during the Biden administration, "8646" was a #GOP thing, even appearing on tshirts & hats still for sale on Amazon.

                Y'all gonna arrest & prosecute those folks for calling for Biden's assassination?

                Still waiting...

                Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                cynblogger@sfba.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cynblogger@sfba.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cynblogger@sfba.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @ginaintheburg
                Now we’re going to have 4-6 weeks of nonstop Comey reporting & punditry before the DOJ is once again proven to be stupid, feckless, & ignorant of the Constitution and laws, and ends the prosecution when it loses yet again before a judge or Grand Jury. Rinse and repeat.

                Just as 47 doesn’t under tariffs, the DOJ doesn’t seem to get the First Amendment. 🙄

                paninid@mastodon.worldP ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • cynblogger@sfba.socialC cynblogger@sfba.social

                  @ginaintheburg
                  Now we’re going to have 4-6 weeks of nonstop Comey reporting & punditry before the DOJ is once again proven to be stupid, feckless, & ignorant of the Constitution and laws, and ends the prosecution when it loses yet again before a judge or Grand Jury. Rinse and repeat.

                  Just as 47 doesn’t under tariffs, the DOJ doesn’t seem to get the First Amendment. 🙄

                  paninid@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                  paninid@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                  paninid@mastodon.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @cynblogger @ginaintheburg

                  Gets it. Doesn’t care because dementia-addled and whims are all being stage managed

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cynblogger@sfba.socialC cynblogger@sfba.social

                    @ginaintheburg
                    Now we’re going to have 4-6 weeks of nonstop Comey reporting & punditry before the DOJ is once again proven to be stupid, feckless, & ignorant of the Constitution and laws, and ends the prosecution when it loses yet again before a judge or Grand Jury. Rinse and repeat.

                    Just as 47 doesn’t under tariffs, the DOJ doesn’t seem to get the First Amendment. 🙄

                    ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ginaintheburg@mastodon.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ginaintheburg@mastodon.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @cynblogger
                    Or care. They get to plunder the US Treasury that taxpayers pay for while James Comey has to come up w/the personal funds to pay for his legal defense.

                    It's an old legal strategy: exhaust your opponent's resources. Big fish w/deep pockets will easily be able to outlast little fish.

                    Comey is no little fish, tho he still doesn't have the staff or money that #DoJ does & yet will win.

                    As always w/Trump, the cruelty is the pt.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups