"Nearly nine out of 10 legal professionals say they use AI in some capacity ..."

[tek@freeradical.zone]

@neil More than most professions, yes. They’re still on the hook and responsible for their advice. Like doctors and engineers and CPAs, giving bad advice is potentially career ending and bankrupting for them. They have some skin in the game.

[neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk]

@troed Interesting - thank you!

(FWIW, I would absolutely want to know if a doctor was using AI, or even automatic transcription, as part of treating/assessing me!)

[thorium@social.linux.pizza]

@neil @noodlemaz I thought that you were an international man of myster

[paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange]

@neil

there are certain professions where LLM based AI and fuzzy answers just won't cut it. most are actual professions, with licensing requirements, like law, medicine, accounting, civil engineering/architecture, where incorrect or fuzzy answers kill people or incarcerate them.

i don't ever see a good use of LLM AI in such professions.

[d_rift@beige.party]

@neil I expect anyone I interact with in a professional capacity to tell me up front what data they collect and how it's processed, including all AI use. I expect them to tell me if their notes on our meeting will be stored in the cloud, will be uploaded to another jurisdiction, will be processed by a third party... My expectations are unlikely to be met but in my opinion they ought to be normal.

[troed@swecyb.com]

@neil Sorry for the Swedish but here's a clickable map detailing all the different things in healthcare where AI is used at the moment. I think some of the medical terms might be readily understood in English as well due to latin roots

(And yes, there is pushback since the transcription has been dangerously wrong at times)

Vårdkartan - Utforska AI-initiativ inom vårdsektorn

Vårdkartan visar AI-initiativ i svensk hälso- och sjukvård. Utforska hur regionerna utvecklar framtidens vård med AI. Skapat av Datastory och AI Sweden.

Vårdkartan (vardkartan.ai.se)

[d_rift@beige.party]

@neil To me this is a modernization of nothing more or less than being able to see who is in the room.

[rail@snailedit.social]

@neil id want to know exactly what they use, like someone’s DPA policy

I think there’s valid use of ML which works but anything generative is a hard no, and wouldn’t be something I’d like a lawyer to use and would be cause to look for alternative council

[highlandlawyer@mastodon.social]

@neil
Are they trying to get enough uptake rapidly enough that by the time a professional negligence case gets to court they'll have outrun the Hunter v Hanley (Sc) / Bolam (Eng) test?

[neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk]

@troed Fascinating - thank you!

[williamleech@mastodon.world]

@neil I think that is quite a complicated question and depends how you define AI - using an LLM to write a contract? I'd want to know (and avoid).
Using a Co-pilot suggested reply email of "sure, that time works for me" or using a spell check that was using an LLM (I think Grammarly's spell check is AI now) ? Not so much. I wouldn't necessarily expect a lawyer who specialised in conveyancing to know all the situations where they might be using AI.

[neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk]

@WilliamLeech Nuanced responses are welcome!

[williamleech@mastodon.world]

@neil I'm afraid that's as nuanced as I get here!

[epilepticrabbit@social.coop]

@dajb @neil I'm still proud of that piece of work and use the principles if I use AI, which I do, sometimes but not all the time because believe it or not my brain is still wicked functional

[marthabennett@mastodon.social]

@neil I'd ask whether they used AI, and if yes, I'd ask what they used, what they used it for, and how. The answer to that would determine whether I find a different lawyer.