Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. As the news is reporting, sadly there was a terrible plane crash at LaGuardia Airport at 23:38 local last night.

As the news is reporting, sadly there was a terrible plane crash at LaGuardia Airport at 23:38 local last night.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
chillyatcadvent
33 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chillybot@infosec.exchangeC chillybot@infosec.exchange

    @DaveMWilburn
    To explain for others, anticipatory clearance in this case refers to the practice of essentially preventing the runway from being used by anyone other than the plane cleared to land. ATCs in the US do not currently do this while a lot of Europe does.

    Regarding the briefing, I do not believe this specifically was discussed. That being said yesterday was the first full day of investigation and I think the NTSB will likely look into it.

    davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    davemwilburn@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @chillybot I was under the impression that "anticipatory clearance" is an American FAA practice, unusual elsewhere in the world, of granting clearance to inbound aircraft before the runway is clear, in anticipation of any preceding aircraft and other obstacles clearing the runway before their arrival. Am I wrong?

    chillybot@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD davemwilburn@infosec.exchange

      @chillybot I was under the impression that "anticipatory clearance" is an American FAA practice, unusual elsewhere in the world, of granting clearance to inbound aircraft before the runway is clear, in anticipation of any preceding aircraft and other obstacles clearing the runway before their arrival. Am I wrong?

      chillybot@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      chillybot@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      chillybot@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @DaveMWilburn
      You are not! I forgot a not haha Your phrasing is indeed better

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • chillybot@infosec.exchangeC chillybot@infosec.exchange

        @adamshostack
        Yupppp, exactly. Bring back the CSRB! Aviation makes me jealous. We as an industry have much to learn from them.
        @paul_ipv6 @boblord @wendynather

        tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
        tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
        tindrasgrove@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @chillybot @adamshostack @paul_ipv6 @boblord @wendynather the best incident report ive read was written by someone who was given zero guidance on how to investigate, but he was previously an aviator, so he just did what he knew.

        adamshostack@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT tindrasgrove@infosec.exchange

          @chillybot @adamshostack @paul_ipv6 @boblord @wendynather the best incident report ive read was written by someone who was given zero guidance on how to investigate, but he was previously an aviator, so he just did what he knew.

          adamshostack@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          adamshostack@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          adamshostack@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @TindrasGrove @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord Must.. reinvent.. wheel!

          tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT ferrix@mastodon.onlineF 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • adamshostack@infosec.exchangeA adamshostack@infosec.exchange

            @TindrasGrove @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord Must.. reinvent.. wheel!

            tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            tindrasgrove@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @adamshostack @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord
            Just change all the acronyms and no one will know you just copy/pasted entire manuals

            tarah@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • chillybot@infosec.exchangeC chillybot@infosec.exchange

              Okay I watched the second NTSB press briefing twice yesterday and have some juicy deets to dish out for you fine folks. Some of this was previously available/self evident but I wanted to wait a bit for the NTSB to do its thing. Here we go Longer post so maybe bookmark and read later.

              • First off, as the chairwoman succinctly emphasized: If a airline crash happens, many things likely went wrong. Flying is so safe because it has defense in depth built in. I personally would like to say we must resist the very natural desire to focus on "okay, who f'ed up". This is a search for the truth.

              • The controller clearly at least twice told the truck to stop before the crash

              • Two controllers were in the air traffic control tower cab (in layman's terms, the top most part of the tower with windows where the active ATCs oversee things and work) at the time. They had just gone on duty for the "midnight" (22:30-06:30) shift at ~22:30ish local time.

              • There is conflicting information on which air traffic controller was in charge of operations on the ground.

              • The controllers at the time were dealing with another emergency on the ground. So there was a heavy workload on controllers who were also working multiple positions. NTSB cautions about talking about "controller distraction" as they were doing their job.

              • The controllers were doing combined positions since it was the midnight shift. This is the standard operating procedure for a lot of airports, including Newark. (See other #ChillyATCAdventures posts). The chairwoman has concerns about this nationwide common practice and so do I.

              • Conflicting reports on how many certified ATCs were in the facility overall. ATCs are supposed to take periodic breaks and be relieved by another controller.

              • The truck did not have a transponder to report its location. The airport did have airport surface detection equipment (ASDE-X) but the ground radar did not alert since the proximity of multiple ARFF trucks caused the system to have low confidence.

              • The automatic runway status lights were operational and indicated it was not clear to cross the runway

              • Chairwoman Homendy is awesome, as usual

              #AvGeek

              mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              mlanger@mastodon.world
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @chillybot @rpmik In defense of ATC handling multiple positions after midnight: there's very little traffic at an airport between midnight and maybe 5 AM. I'm not saying that it was OK to do so in this particular situation because I don't know the details of the situation. I'm just saying that it is reasonable to have less staff in the middle of the night than, say, in the morning between 8 AM and 11 AM.

              chillybot@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mlanger@mastodon.worldM mlanger@mastodon.world

                @chillybot @rpmik In defense of ATC handling multiple positions after midnight: there's very little traffic at an airport between midnight and maybe 5 AM. I'm not saying that it was OK to do so in this particular situation because I don't know the details of the situation. I'm just saying that it is reasonable to have less staff in the middle of the night than, say, in the morning between 8 AM and 11 AM.

                chillybot@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                chillybot@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                chillybot@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @mlanger
                This is very true. Occasionally, however, it can get quite busy but usually it is a light shift.
                @rpmik

                mlanger@mastodon.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chillybot@infosec.exchangeC chillybot@infosec.exchange

                  @mlanger
                  This is very true. Occasionally, however, it can get quite busy but usually it is a light shift.
                  @rpmik

                  mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mlanger@mastodon.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @chillybot @rpmik I bet it gets zoo like when weather delays have flights arriving much later than originally expected. But I'd also hope that they'd be able to modify scheduling on the fly to handle things like that. Maybe I'm just expecting too much of them.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tindrasgrove@infosec.exchangeT tindrasgrove@infosec.exchange

                    @adamshostack @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord
                    Just change all the acronyms and no one will know you just copy/pasted entire manuals

                    tarah@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tarah@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tarah@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @TindrasGrove @adamshostack @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord I knew when co-authoring a small subset of the manuals that there was a good shot they’d be ignored, but it’s profoundly difficult to see best practices eroded into nothingness.

                    wendynather@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tarah@infosec.exchangeT tarah@infosec.exchange

                      @TindrasGrove @adamshostack @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord I knew when co-authoring a small subset of the manuals that there was a good shot they’d be ignored, but it’s profoundly difficult to see best practices eroded into nothingness.

                      wendynather@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wendynather@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wendynather@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @Tarah @TindrasGrove @adamshostack @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord Have you been in infosec long? 😆

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • adamshostack@infosec.exchangeA adamshostack@infosec.exchange

                        @TindrasGrove @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord Must.. reinvent.. wheel!

                        ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
                        ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
                        ferrix@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        @adamshostack @TindrasGrove @wendynather @chillybot @paul_ipv6 @boblord RaaS, roundness in the cloud is just somebody else's wheel

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • chillybot@infosec.exchangeC chillybot@infosec.exchange

                          Okay I watched the second NTSB press briefing twice yesterday and have some juicy deets to dish out for you fine folks. Some of this was previously available/self evident but I wanted to wait a bit for the NTSB to do its thing. Here we go Longer post so maybe bookmark and read later.

                          • First off, as the chairwoman succinctly emphasized: If a airline crash happens, many things likely went wrong. Flying is so safe because it has defense in depth built in. I personally would like to say we must resist the very natural desire to focus on "okay, who f'ed up". This is a search for the truth.

                          • The controller clearly at least twice told the truck to stop before the crash

                          • Two controllers were in the air traffic control tower cab (in layman's terms, the top most part of the tower with windows where the active ATCs oversee things and work) at the time. They had just gone on duty for the "midnight" (22:30-06:30) shift at ~22:30ish local time.

                          • There is conflicting information on which air traffic controller was in charge of operations on the ground.

                          • The controllers at the time were dealing with another emergency on the ground. So there was a heavy workload on controllers who were also working multiple positions. NTSB cautions about talking about "controller distraction" as they were doing their job.

                          • The controllers were doing combined positions since it was the midnight shift. This is the standard operating procedure for a lot of airports, including Newark. (See other #ChillyATCAdventures posts). The chairwoman has concerns about this nationwide common practice and so do I.

                          • Conflicting reports on how many certified ATCs were in the facility overall. ATCs are supposed to take periodic breaks and be relieved by another controller.

                          • The truck did not have a transponder to report its location. The airport did have airport surface detection equipment (ASDE-X) but the ground radar did not alert since the proximity of multiple ARFF trucks caused the system to have low confidence.

                          • The automatic runway status lights were operational and indicated it was not clear to cross the runway

                          • Chairwoman Homendy is awesome, as usual

                          #AvGeek

                          user47@vmst.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
                          user47@vmst.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
                          user47@vmst.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @chillybot hi. Your avatar is awesome

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups