Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 21 Posters 68 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

    The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

    Link Preview Image
    amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
    amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
    amici@fribygda.no
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @infobeautiful

    war and conflict is unfortunately a likely major contributor to this, though I'm glad the shift is happening

    just look at what happened to Cuba lately, without fuel the society goes to a standstill, they desperately need more green tech and everyone will know that unless they also make the shift, the unpredictability of fossil fuel politics may hit them hard at some point, adding to all the other existing arguments to shift

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

      @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

      bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigheadmode@social.linux.pizza
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @tartley The Total Addressable Market of solar panels is anywhere that can have a reasonable ROI on a solar panel given local electricity demand. As panels get cheaper they become economical in cloudier places.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tartley@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @dryak @aanee @infobeautiful I totally agree. I suppose the black-pilled establishment energy industry might expect another limiting factor would be running out of loony environmentalists to sell them too, if they could only sway public opinion sufficiently. But I agree with you, they were holding back the tide.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • martin@libera.siteM martin@libera.site
          @Jonathan Hartley Nope. You need 100% backup(from about 50% of Ren share). Fossil backup.
          That's why it's not cheap. and will not be. Never.

          #^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkelflaute
          tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tartley@fosstodon.org
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @martin you might need access to 100% backup while still being able to reduce your need for fossil generated energy by a majority amount - those aren't incompatible.

          martin@libera.siteM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

            @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful are you asking about "lobbying" efforts (this would be R 2023/1542 and Digital Battery Passport kicking in next year). The whole regulations only skim non-patentable technologies, like lead-acid batteries. These can be operational for millenia, due to their simple chemistry. The only maintenance that must be done is on-site processing of sulfated battery plates. Something that once upon a time (1950-1990) was being done on the massive scale in Central/East Europe countries. Then lobbied country's legislative can bar mid-sized installations as unable to met the EU demands (tried recently in Poland afair).

            dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @ohir
            So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

            Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

            @infobeautiful

            ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wonka@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @TechConnectify has a take on that: https://youtu.be/KtQ9nt2ZeGM

              @dryak @tartley @aanee @infobeautiful

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                Link Preview Image
                simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                simplicator@federate.social
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @infobeautiful More than enough to power a DeLorean back to the future 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nicolai@babka.socialN nicolai@babka.social

                  @infobeautiful the IEA is famous for denying what cannot be denied until the very last minute.

                  nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nicolai@babka.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @infobeautiful the IEA is traditionally very nuclear friendly and of course aware that solar and wind are pushing nuclear from „expensive but with enough subsidies and imperialism it might work“ into „are you ducking nuts?!?“ territory

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

                    @martin you might need access to 100% backup while still being able to reduce your need for fossil generated energy by a majority amount - those aren't incompatible.

                    martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martin@libera.site
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31
                    @Jonathan Hartley
                    That's true. But it will be expensive. Even with zero price for FV panels.

                    Or we could have a stable ☢️ and not have installations with 200% of the required performance, right...
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

                      @ohir
                      So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

                      Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

                      @infobeautiful

                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful [...] Yes! Almost every point of anti-storage propaganda repeated (the one omitted is about hydrogen being flammable).

                      Debunking:
                      1. All components of lead-acid batteries are curently _byproducts_ of other indispensable industries. Lead itself accompanies copper ores. Sulfur is a byproduct of natural gas/oil. Whether either "waste" byproduct ends up in landfills or in batteries matters.
                      2. Battery plates can be renovated on-site using very simple machines. 50yrs ago operated by humans, now can be entirely autonomous. Very small storages (house) can be renovated by mobile semi-van mounted machine.
                      3. "Highly hazardous" acid somehow is not that hazardous if used in the car battery. Nor it was when used in warehouse lifters since 1890.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

                        @ohir
                        So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

                        Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

                        @infobeautiful

                        ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                        ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                        ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful

                        As for the heat storage: mid-temperature heat accumulator can store around 1MWh per 1 cubic meter of gravel. Insulated by the very same gravel turned into the mineral wool. My house heat accu (I can not build on my own land) is designed to the tune of 7MWh, co it could store heat from 30kW solar installation operating from March to September. This fits into the 6m diameter rotunde. In 2020 was expected to cost around €15000. 4/5 of that the insulation. In non-lobbied regulatory environment this insulation could be made on-site from the gravel (and some amount of aluminium) by simple machine known for two centuries now.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • bitprophet@social.coopB bitprophet@social.coop

                          @infobeautiful why were people predicting a /downslope/ for so long, seems like a bizarre forecast. “Oh, solar rates have been climbing modestly for the last few years but I’m sure it’s just a passing fad…”

                          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @bitprophet @infobeautiful there is a whole book by @solar_chase from bloombergNEF on the subject.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                            The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                            Link Preview Image
                            davidm_yeg@mstdn.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidm_yeg@mstdn.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidm_yeg@mstdn.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            @infobeautiful

                            It’s almost like there’s an entrenched, wealthy, and powerful special interest group with a vested interest in discouraging investments in solar … 🤷‍♂️

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups