Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
17 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

    so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

    Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

    @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

    favicon

    Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

    kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
    kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
    kim@k.iim.gay
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @technomancy i'm not that far off becoming a netbsd weirdo myself. i'm already on Void, originally started by a netbsd dev 😛

    technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kim@k.iim.gayK kim@k.iim.gay

      @technomancy i'm not that far off becoming a netbsd weirdo myself. i'm already on Void, originally started by a netbsd dev 😛

      technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @kim as excited as I was about that post I linked to, I should have done a little more due diligence before posting it

      looking more closely for citations, I can't find anything concrete re: LLM policy from either freebsd or openbsd; netbsd appears to be the only one with an actual published stance! so good for them

      unfortunately there is no librewolf or fennel packaged for netbsd =(

      kim@k.iim.gayK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dan@axillae.telent.netD dan@axillae.telent.net

        @technomancy alpine linux uses openrc, though I haven't found any kind of llm statement either pro or anti on their site

        kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
        kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
        kim@k.iim.gay
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @dan @technomancy i think they're anti-llm, or at least a core contributor (ariadne) is for sure. and openrc is anti-llm for sure.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

          so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

          Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

          @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

          favicon

          Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

          orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
          orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
          orva@social.orva.fi
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @technomancy Time for guix! Parenthesis all the way down!

          technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • orva@social.orva.fiO orva@social.orva.fi

            @technomancy Time for guix! Parenthesis all the way down!

            technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
            technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
            technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @orva I expect they are more likely than most to do a good job with this, but I can't find any explicit policy around this; do you know if their stance has been published anywhere? I'd like more to go on than just a good feeling

            orva@social.orva.fiO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

              @orva I expect they are more likely than most to do a good job with this, but I can't find any explicit policy around this; do you know if their stance has been published anywhere? I'd like more to go on than just a good feeling

              orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
              orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
              orva@social.orva.fi
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @technomancy Same feelings/knowledge as well, no explicit denouncement even though I know there is strong anti-llm sentiment.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                @kim as excited as I was about that post I linked to, I should have done a little more due diligence before posting it

                looking more closely for citations, I can't find anything concrete re: LLM policy from either freebsd or openbsd; netbsd appears to be the only one with an actual published stance! so good for them

                unfortunately there is no librewolf or fennel packaged for netbsd =(

                kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
                kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
                kim@k.iim.gay
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @technomancy well if i end up trying it out and package librewolf i'll let you know :p. i already packaged it for Void!

                technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kim@k.iim.gayK kim@k.iim.gay

                  @technomancy well if i end up trying it out and package librewolf i'll let you know :p. i already packaged it for Void!

                  technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                  technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                  technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @kim not all heroes

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                    so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

                    Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

                    @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

                    favicon

                    Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

                    khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                    khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                    khm@hj.9fs.net
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11
                    openbsd: yes
                    netbsd: sure
                    freebsd: hmm
                    dragonflybsd: maybe
                    ghostbsd: no

                    speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                    still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                    for now.
                    crypt17@mas.toC pmjv@snac.lab8.czP cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
                      openbsd: yes
                      netbsd: sure
                      freebsd: hmm
                      dragonflybsd: maybe
                      ghostbsd: no

                      speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                      still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                      for now.
                      crypt17@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crypt17@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crypt17@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @khm @technomancy
                      is this an mnt reform with the rk3588?

                      I am hoping that it will run openbsd soonish

                      khm@hj.9fs.netK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
                        openbsd: yes
                        netbsd: sure
                        freebsd: hmm
                        dragonflybsd: maybe
                        ghostbsd: no

                        speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                        still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                        for now.
                        pmjv@snac.lab8.czP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pmjv@snac.lab8.czP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pmjv@snac.lab8.cz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13
                        ghost just doesn't belong in the somewhat-holy tetrad

                        i always thought it was just freebsd with a wallpaper

                        CC: @technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
                          openbsd: yes
                          netbsd: sure
                          freebsd: hmm
                          dragonflybsd: maybe
                          ghostbsd: no

                          speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                          still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                          for now.
                          cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cgnarne@hj.9fs.net
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14
                          @khm@hj.9fs.net @technomancy@hey.hagelb.org this "let's import the linux kpi wholesale" thing is annoying. I've not heard about any nutjob takeover attempt.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • crypt17@mas.toC crypt17@mas.to

                            @khm @technomancy
                            is this an mnt reform with the rk3588?

                            I am hoping that it will run openbsd soonish

                            khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                            khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                            khm@hj.9fs.net
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15
                            read the obsd changelog and you'd think it's been running for years!
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                              technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                              technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @khm well unfortunately from what I could tell freebsd is the only one with librewolf

                              switching from debian/librewolf to openbsd/firefox seems like a 1-step-forward-1-step-back kind of thing, especially since the harm of langlemangle shit in linux is mostly hypothetical while in firefox it's very in-your-face

                              also netbsd afaict is the only one with a strong published stance on LLM contributions; if openbsd has one, I couldn't find it (supposedly freebsd is at least "working on it")

                              khm@hj.9fs.netK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                                @khm well unfortunately from what I could tell freebsd is the only one with librewolf

                                switching from debian/librewolf to openbsd/firefox seems like a 1-step-forward-1-step-back kind of thing, especially since the harm of langlemangle shit in linux is mostly hypothetical while in firefox it's very in-your-face

                                also netbsd afaict is the only one with a strong published stance on LLM contributions; if openbsd has one, I couldn't find it (supposedly freebsd is at least "working on it")

                                khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khm@hj.9fs.net
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17
                                There's librewolf in pkgsrc-wip so it should be pretty easy to build on NetBSD.

                                I tried librewolf a while back, and it takes me just as long to reconfigure it as it does to reconfigure firefox, so they're a wash for me, but I get that "does it run the software I want" is a Pretty Important OS Choice Factor
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups