Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
17 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

    so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

    Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

    @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

    favicon

    Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

    dan@axillae.telent.netD This user is from outside of this forum
    dan@axillae.telent.netD This user is from outside of this forum
    dan@axillae.telent.net
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @technomancy alpine linux uses openrc, though I haven't found any kind of llm statement either pro or anti on their site

    kim@k.iim.gayK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

      so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

      Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

      @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

      favicon

      Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

      kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
      kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
      kim@k.iim.gay
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @technomancy i'm not that far off becoming a netbsd weirdo myself. i'm already on Void, originally started by a netbsd dev 😛

      technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • kim@k.iim.gayK kim@k.iim.gay

        @technomancy i'm not that far off becoming a netbsd weirdo myself. i'm already on Void, originally started by a netbsd dev 😛

        technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @kim as excited as I was about that post I linked to, I should have done a little more due diligence before posting it

        looking more closely for citations, I can't find anything concrete re: LLM policy from either freebsd or openbsd; netbsd appears to be the only one with an actual published stance! so good for them

        unfortunately there is no librewolf or fennel packaged for netbsd =(

        kim@k.iim.gayK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dan@axillae.telent.netD dan@axillae.telent.net

          @technomancy alpine linux uses openrc, though I haven't found any kind of llm statement either pro or anti on their site

          kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
          kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
          kim@k.iim.gay
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @dan @technomancy i think they're anti-llm, or at least a core contributor (ariadne) is for sure. and openrc is anti-llm for sure.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

            so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

            Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

            @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

            favicon

            Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

            orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
            orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
            orva@social.orva.fi
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @technomancy Time for guix! Parenthesis all the way down!

            technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • orva@social.orva.fiO orva@social.orva.fi

              @technomancy Time for guix! Parenthesis all the way down!

              technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @orva I expect they are more likely than most to do a good job with this, but I can't find any explicit policy around this; do you know if their stance has been published anywhere? I'd like more to go on than just a good feeling

              orva@social.orva.fiO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                @orva I expect they are more likely than most to do a good job with this, but I can't find any explicit policy around this; do you know if their stance has been published anywhere? I'd like more to go on than just a good feeling

                orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
                orva@social.orva.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
                orva@social.orva.fi
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @technomancy Same feelings/knowledge as well, no explicit denouncement even though I know there is strong anti-llm sentiment.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                  @kim as excited as I was about that post I linked to, I should have done a little more due diligence before posting it

                  looking more closely for citations, I can't find anything concrete re: LLM policy from either freebsd or openbsd; netbsd appears to be the only one with an actual published stance! so good for them

                  unfortunately there is no librewolf or fennel packaged for netbsd =(

                  kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kim@k.iim.gayK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kim@k.iim.gay
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @technomancy well if i end up trying it out and package librewolf i'll let you know :p. i already packaged it for Void!

                  technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • kim@k.iim.gayK kim@k.iim.gay

                    @technomancy well if i end up trying it out and package librewolf i'll let you know :p. i already packaged it for Void!

                    technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                    technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                    technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @kim not all heroes

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                      so, should I become a BSD weirdo?

                      Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire: (@mwl@io.mwl.io)

                      @owen@mastodon.transneptune.net @mhoye@cosocial.ca the three main BSD projects have all rejected LLM for code

                      favicon

                      Sufficiently Amusing Author (io.mwl.io)

                      khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                      khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                      khm@hj.9fs.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11
                      openbsd: yes
                      netbsd: sure
                      freebsd: hmm
                      dragonflybsd: maybe
                      ghostbsd: no

                      speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                      still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                      for now.
                      crypt17@mas.toC pmjv@snac.lab8.czP cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
                        openbsd: yes
                        netbsd: sure
                        freebsd: hmm
                        dragonflybsd: maybe
                        ghostbsd: no

                        speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                        still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                        for now.
                        crypt17@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                        crypt17@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                        crypt17@mas.to
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @khm @technomancy
                        is this an mnt reform with the rk3588?

                        I am hoping that it will run openbsd soonish

                        khm@hj.9fs.netK 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
                          openbsd: yes
                          netbsd: sure
                          freebsd: hmm
                          dragonflybsd: maybe
                          ghostbsd: no

                          speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                          still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                          for now.
                          pmjv@snac.lab8.czP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pmjv@snac.lab8.czP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pmjv@snac.lab8.cz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13
                          ghost just doesn't belong in the somewhat-holy tetrad

                          i always thought it was just freebsd with a wallpaper

                          CC: @technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
                            openbsd: yes
                            netbsd: sure
                            freebsd: hmm
                            dragonflybsd: maybe
                            ghostbsd: no

                            speaking as a looooong time freebsd partisan, they've been making some weird decisions lately and are currently undergoing a colonization attempt by reactionary nutjobs

                            still beats the shit out of linux though. you have to be turbo-selective to get a laptop that works with any of the three big BSDs -- lots of them (even dell and thinkpad "enterprise" stuff) still have fucked-up DSDTs or firmware bugs that make trouble. for many years I've done BSD on servers and desktops, but the mnt reform doesn't run BSD so that's still Alpine

                            for now.
                            cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cgnarne@hj.9fs.net
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14
                            @khm@hj.9fs.net @technomancy@hey.hagelb.org this "let's import the linux kpi wholesale" thing is annoying. I've not heard about any nutjob takeover attempt.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • crypt17@mas.toC crypt17@mas.to

                              @khm @technomancy
                              is this an mnt reform with the rk3588?

                              I am hoping that it will run openbsd soonish

                              khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                              khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                              khm@hj.9fs.net
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15
                              read the obsd changelog and you'd think it's been running for years!
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @khm well unfortunately from what I could tell freebsd is the only one with librewolf

                                switching from debian/librewolf to openbsd/firefox seems like a 1-step-forward-1-step-back kind of thing, especially since the harm of langlemangle shit in linux is mostly hypothetical while in firefox it's very in-your-face

                                also netbsd afaict is the only one with a strong published stance on LLM contributions; if openbsd has one, I couldn't find it (supposedly freebsd is at least "working on it")

                                khm@hj.9fs.netK 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                                  @khm well unfortunately from what I could tell freebsd is the only one with librewolf

                                  switching from debian/librewolf to openbsd/firefox seems like a 1-step-forward-1-step-back kind of thing, especially since the harm of langlemangle shit in linux is mostly hypothetical while in firefox it's very in-your-face

                                  also netbsd afaict is the only one with a strong published stance on LLM contributions; if openbsd has one, I couldn't find it (supposedly freebsd is at least "working on it")

                                  khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  khm@hj.9fs.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17
                                  There's librewolf in pkgsrc-wip so it should be pretty easy to build on NetBSD.

                                  I tried librewolf a while back, and it takes me just as long to reconfigure it as it does to reconfigure firefox, so they're a wash for me, but I get that "does it run the software I want" is a Pretty Important OS Choice Factor
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups