Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. @whitequark

@whitequark

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
17 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jlargentaye@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jlargentaye@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jlargentaye@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @whitequark this is horrible. Can someone more motivated than me confirm this from ls’s source code?

    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jlargentaye@mas.toJ jlargentaye@mas.to

      @whitequark this is horrible. Can someone more motivated than me confirm this from ls’s source code?

      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
      whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @jlargentaye i think it's doing something else entirely that inflates the total and i don't know what that is

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

        the SI people are right and everybody doing it otherwise is wrong; you should never use the "K", "M", etc unit prefixes to mean factor of 1024. sure, with small enough sizes you can usually ignore it. but scale it up and you quickly run into trouble

        kkremitzki@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kkremitzki@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kkremitzki@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @whitequark feels like if one is to consider themselves a computer "scientist" this basic detail about correct units is not optional

        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kkremitzki@mastodon.socialK kkremitzki@mastodon.social

          @whitequark feels like if one is to consider themselves a computer "scientist" this basic detail about correct units is not optional

          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
          whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @kkremitzki you would hope so but

          ninjadebugger@mastodon.sandwich.netN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

            @munin nope, the total now exceeds both numbers. what is going on

            munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
            munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
            munin@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @whitequark

            sentences I'd never expected to say: what version of ls do you have? I'm curious to see if it's replicable on any of the systems I have

            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

              @whitequark

              sentences I'd never expected to say: what version of ls do you have? I'm curious to see if it's replicable on any of the systems I have

              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @munin gnu coreutils

              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                @munin gnu coreutils

                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @munin try using xfs and just doing dd if=/dev/zero of=file0000 bs=1M count=5120 to replicate what i'm having

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                  @kkremitzki you would hope so but

                  ninjadebugger@mastodon.sandwich.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                  ninjadebugger@mastodon.sandwich.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                  ninjadebugger@mastodon.sandwich.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @whitequark @kkremitzki

                  No, incorrect. Hail Eris and pass the misused units.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                    the SI people are right and everybody doing it otherwise is wrong; you should never use the "K", "M", etc unit prefixes to mean factor of 1024. sure, with small enough sizes you can usually ignore it. but scale it up and you quickly run into trouble

                    snowfox@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                    snowfox@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                    snowfox@tech.lgbt
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @whitequark K means Kelvin and MB means megabel 😛

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                      the SI people are right and everybody doing it otherwise is wrong; you should never use the "K", "M", etc unit prefixes to mean factor of 1024. sure, with small enough sizes you can usually ignore it. but scale it up and you quickly run into trouble

                      darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      darkling@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @whitequark Sadly, my favourite example of this sort of confusion is too antiquated for most people now.

                      Is a 1.44M floppy disk using MB or MiB?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups