Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
28 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

    A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

    “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

    The same thing, without trying to be hip:

    “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

    Link Preview Image
    AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

    AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

    favicon

    Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

    emc2@indieweb.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    emc2@indieweb.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    emc2@indieweb.social
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @raganwald

    Words that stick in my head: always look at what someone could become with the right support and guidance.

    raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • emc2@indieweb.socialE emc2@indieweb.social

      @raganwald

      Words that stick in my head: always look at what someone could become with the right support and guidance.

      raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
      raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
      raganwald@social.bau-ha.us
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @emc2 From when I was in leadership:

      "What could this team accomplish if I got the rest of the org out the fuck of their way?"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

        A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

        “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

        The same thing, without trying to be hip:

        “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

        Link Preview Image
        AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

        AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

        favicon

        Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        gbsills@social.vivaldi.net
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @raganwald This was good. When I first interacted with GitHub Copilot, I felt it was like an automated junior developer without an ability to get better. This includes Copilot cutting an pasting code found on StackOverflow and GitHub, just like a junior developer. So, of course, business guys would decide "hey, we can just hire a senior guy to code review the AI code. What could go wrong?"

        And no, other AI coding tools are not any better.

        raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gbsills@social.vivaldi.net

          @raganwald This was good. When I first interacted with GitHub Copilot, I felt it was like an automated junior developer without an ability to get better. This includes Copilot cutting an pasting code found on StackOverflow and GitHub, just like a junior developer. So, of course, business guys would decide "hey, we can just hire a senior guy to code review the AI code. What could go wrong?"

          And no, other AI coding tools are not any better.

          raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
          raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
          raganwald@social.bau-ha.us
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @gbsills Putting my technical product manager hat on top of my product design hat, if I can ethically do 4x the delivery, I would rather ship four variations of one feature behind feature flags and test the results, than ship four features serially and be too busy shipping the next four to review the results of my experiments.

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

            @gbsills Putting my technical product manager hat on top of my product design hat, if I can ethically do 4x the delivery, I would rather ship four variations of one feature behind feature flags and test the results, than ship four features serially and be too busy shipping the next four to review the results of my experiments.

            G This user is from outside of this forum
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            gbsills@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @raganwald Yeah, it is hard for product managers to withstand the pressure to release product quickly. Often, phrases like "shipped on xx/xx/xxxx" and the development run rate $$$ is the only thing the people above them understand.

            raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gbsills@social.vivaldi.net

              @raganwald Yeah, it is hard for product managers to withstand the pressure to release product quickly. Often, phrases like "shipped on xx/xx/xxxx" and the development run rate $$$ is the only thing the people above them understand.

              raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
              raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
              raganwald@social.bau-ha.us
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @gbsills I have spent 25+ years advocating for feedback loops. My go-to slides compared a ballistic approach to air travel (aim very carefully and take EVERYTHING into account at fine levels of detail, then launch and pray) versus flying the aircraft (continuous adjustments in flight).

              Got me respect, but in a crunch leadership would... Go ballistic.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                Link Preview Image
                AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                favicon

                Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                notyoursysadmin@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                notyoursysadmin@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                notyoursysadmin@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @raganwald I think it's very important for us to take lessons from the manufacturing industry here. In the US at least, it's incredibly difficult to make anything domestically. Complicating things further, a Smarter Every Day video from several months ago found that, not only have we lost the ability to make things, we've lost the ability to make the things that make things. In his case, he found that finding folks who knew how to make the molds and metal stamping components was difficult to impossible to find domestically.

                And we're gladly walking into the same trap with knowledge work. It isn't enough that we're outsourcing software development itself. We're outsourcing the ability to make new software engineers. (And, being an Ops person, I'd argue that we're doing that with all knowledge-based roles in general.)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                  A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                  “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                  The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                  “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                  Link Preview Image
                  AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                  AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                  favicon

                  Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                  cdonat@hostsharing.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cdonat@hostsharing.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cdonat@hostsharing.coop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @raganwald

                  At the same time those same companies tell seniors looking for a new job, that they're too old. Not flexible enough.

                  Kept up to date for decades in one of the fastest changing industries. Not flexible enough. Sure!

                  Developed the current technologies, but not flexible enough to use them in their work now. Sure!

                  Like they think, they don't need software developers at all any more. They're wrong, but sadly confident.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                    A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                    “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                    The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                    “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                    Link Preview Image
                    AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                    AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                    favicon

                    Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zimzat@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    This likens back to Netflix (circa 2014) showing they rarely hire Interns/Juniors, to which someone gave a memorable response in the form of "If you don't hire juniors, you don't deserve seniors" in 2018. https://dev.to/isaacdlyman/if-you-dont-hire-juniors-you-dont-deserve-seniors-48kb

                    The industry has been making moves to avoid hiring Juniors, or training _anyone_, for a long time under the assumption someone else will do it or everyone will "sink or swim" on their own (externalizing the cost to individuals).

                    @raganwald

                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

                      This likens back to Netflix (circa 2014) showing they rarely hire Interns/Juniors, to which someone gave a memorable response in the form of "If you don't hire juniors, you don't deserve seniors" in 2018. https://dev.to/isaacdlyman/if-you-dont-hire-juniors-you-dont-deserve-seniors-48kb

                      The industry has been making moves to avoid hiring Juniors, or training _anyone_, for a long time under the assumption someone else will do it or everyone will "sink or swim" on their own (externalizing the cost to individuals).

                      @raganwald

                      zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zimzat@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      The idea that Juniors only exist to write boilerplate has always been wrong; similarly the idea we should use AI to generate boilerplate ignores the fact that boilerplate, by and large, should not exist. It is a sign of a bad abstraction, an inefficient protocol, an outdated model, a code base stuck in the mud, or management blocking enhancements. We don't need ways to generate it faster; we need to engineer ways to avoid it entirely.

                      @raganwald

                      zimzat@mastodon.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

                        The idea that Juniors only exist to write boilerplate has always been wrong; similarly the idea we should use AI to generate boilerplate ignores the fact that boilerplate, by and large, should not exist. It is a sign of a bad abstraction, an inefficient protocol, an outdated model, a code base stuck in the mud, or management blocking enhancements. We don't need ways to generate it faster; we need to engineer ways to avoid it entirely.

                        @raganwald

                        zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                        zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                        zimzat@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        The expectation that folks will learn by osmosis feels like we're continuing to avoid the elephant in the room: The continued lack of regulations, standards, certifications, professional associations, and unions means "Senior Software Engineer" has no actual meaning beyond vibes and feels and we are long past the point where that needs to change. We don't engineer buildings based on vibes, nor should software.

                        @raganwald

                        zimzat@mastodon.socialZ ryencode@mstdn.caR 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

                          The expectation that folks will learn by osmosis feels like we're continuing to avoid the elephant in the room: The continued lack of regulations, standards, certifications, professional associations, and unions means "Senior Software Engineer" has no actual meaning beyond vibes and feels and we are long past the point where that needs to change. We don't engineer buildings based on vibes, nor should software.

                          @raganwald

                          zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zimzat@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          The reality is that most software problems are solved; what we're doing is failing to disseminate the solutions as best practices because we rely on word-of-mouth. Companies expect developers to learn on their own time while also running everyone at 120% capacity with deadlines of "due: yesterday" give no time to fix anything and denying any autonomy... and then individual growth becomes stunted.

                          ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                          @raganwald

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                            A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                            “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                            The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                            “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                            Link Preview Image
                            AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                            AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                            favicon

                            Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                            0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
                            0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
                            0x4d6165@transfem.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @raganwald@social.bau-ha.us "Every senior engineer alive today got their start doing the exact grunt work they're now saying juniors don't need to do. That's not progress. That's pulling the ladder up behind you."

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                              A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                              “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                              The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                              “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                              Link Preview Image
                              AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                              AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                              favicon

                              Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                              marco@mastodon.skup.inM This user is from outside of this forum
                              marco@mastodon.skup.inM This user is from outside of this forum
                              marco@mastodon.skup.in
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @raganwald Thanks to that mindset I can't find a job. Companies keep telling me "you don't have any work experience, come back in 5 years". It's so frustrating. Recently I got my first job offer in 9 months and it was a full time Full-Stack-Developer position for MINUMUM WAGE and 0 benefits.

                              canleaf@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                                A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                                “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                                The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                                “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                                Link Preview Image
                                AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                                AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                                favicon

                                Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                                fentiger@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fentiger@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fentiger@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @raganwald Caveat: the "people who know more than they do" have to be willing to share their knowledge.

                                If they act like some kind of high priesthood, you'll just turn a junior engineer into a pissed off senior engineer who works for someone else instead.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • marco@mastodon.skup.inM marco@mastodon.skup.in

                                  @raganwald Thanks to that mindset I can't find a job. Companies keep telling me "you don't have any work experience, come back in 5 years". It's so frustrating. Recently I got my first job offer in 9 months and it was a full time Full-Stack-Developer position for MINUMUM WAGE and 0 benefits.

                                  canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  canleaf@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @marco @raganwald I got rejected for assignments which called for 5-6 yoe. i have 6 yoe...
                                  not enough experience

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                                    A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                                    “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                                    The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                                    “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                                    AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                                    favicon

                                    Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                                    shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    shapr@recurse.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @raganwald what if we train them and they leave?

                                    Answer: what if you don't and they stay?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

                                      The expectation that folks will learn by osmosis feels like we're continuing to avoid the elephant in the room: The continued lack of regulations, standards, certifications, professional associations, and unions means "Senior Software Engineer" has no actual meaning beyond vibes and feels and we are long past the point where that needs to change. We don't engineer buildings based on vibes, nor should software.

                                      @raganwald

                                      ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ryencode@mstdn.ca
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @zimzat @raganwald "osmosis" his hard for me.
                                      I'm a senior dev, but was this year hired on to an org and failed out bad. They "assumed senior level assets would just pick up their model and methods by osmosis"
                                      Well...
                                      The "model" was clearly a mix of various stages of fixes for various vintages and current failings, unequally spread throughout the codebase. No real best practices.
                                      The current operations kept failing for clear reasons of capacity and failure to adjust for grown requirements. Designers for bulk monolithic operations don't scale when the whole process routinely exhausts all available memory and takes down any adjacent process.
                                      Even a senior coming into a very startup-like structure, will need to be guided into the role, allowed to adjust to the shitshow that is the multi-generarational family of failure modes on exhibit, and can't effectively start making things "awesome" rock star style, on day two. Especially when there are hidden traps of untouchable devs you never see.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                      • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                                        A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                                        “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                                        The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                                        “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                                        AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                                        favicon

                                        Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @raganwald @SteveBellovin Oh, My, God. This is *exactly* what I've been telling people at my work. And it's nothing to do with software. You simply *can't* sustain talent if you don't invest in it. Which means, as you say, hiring juniors and *spending money* to allow seniors to actually train them.

                                        Instead, we underbid contracts. In order to deliver on that, we have zero room for any training or mentoring: our seniors are fully tasked with deliverables.

                                        We're eating our seed corn.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR raganwald@social.bau-ha.us

                                          A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:

                                          “We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”

                                          The same thing, without trying to be hip:

                                          “Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy

                                          AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.

                                          favicon

                                          Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)

                                          a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          a_cubed@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @raganwald @jamesmarshall
                                          I gave my business schol Information Ethics class on AI last week and stressed exactlythis point. Whether LLMs can do the work your junior people can do or not (to an acceptable quality/price), betting your business on the LLM being able to replace senior people in ten years is a bad business decision.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups