A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
@raganwald and those intern career arcs are some of the accomplishments I'm most proud of. We take a tiny chance, they do great work and launch fulfilling careers.
-
@raganwald and those intern career arcs are some of the accomplishments I'm most proud of. We take a tiny chance, they do great work and launch fulfilling careers.
@timfreund I'm not a scientist, but Hammond's famous three questions for new researchers at Bell Labs seems pertinent:
1. What's the most important open problem in your area?
2. What are you working on?
3. Why aren't they the same? -
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
My Artificially Impatient summary:
A CEO reads a book* and "learns" that Juniors are a money sink, because the company pays them more than they are worth today, in the hopes of turning them into a Senior in the future. The CEO recognizes that in game theory, they can "defect" by hiring Seniors that other companies have trained, so they get rid of Juniors. Everyone does this because business is a pop culture, and just as game theory predicts, everyone loses.
-
My Artificially Impatient summary:
A CEO reads a book* and "learns" that Juniors are a money sink, because the company pays them more than they are worth today, in the hopes of turning them into a Senior in the future. The CEO recognizes that in game theory, they can "defect" by hiring Seniors that other companies have trained, so they get rid of Juniors. Everyone does this because business is a pop culture, and just as game theory predicts, everyone loses.
The book's* model is wrong, because Juniors perform a vital "Canary in a Coal Mine" role, and furthermore Seniors are not fungible because poaching a Senior gets you someone with vital experience and context... In somebody else's problem space.
The correct strategy is to hire Juniors, and use the tools not to replace them, but to accelerate their path to Seniority.
_This summary cost 3,652 Ragantokens._
———
* Book, podcast, trade show, round of golf, whatever.
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
-
My Artificially Impatient summary:
A CEO reads a book* and "learns" that Juniors are a money sink, because the company pays them more than they are worth today, in the hopes of turning them into a Senior in the future. The CEO recognizes that in game theory, they can "defect" by hiring Seniors that other companies have trained, so they get rid of Juniors. Everyone does this because business is a pop culture, and just as game theory predicts, everyone loses.
That model is wrong, because Juniors perform a vital "Canary in a Coal Mine" role. And, Seniors are not fungible because poaching a Senior gets you someone with vital experience and context... In somebody else's problem space.
The correct strategy is to hire Juniors, and use the tools not to replace them, but to make them even more productive _and_ accelerate their path to Seniority.
_This summary cost 3,652 Ragantokens._
———
* Book, podcast, trade show, round of golf, whatever.
-
My Artificially Impatient summary:
A CEO reads a book* and "learns" that Juniors are a money sink, because the company pays them more than they are worth today, in the hopes of turning them into a Senior in the future. The CEO recognizes that in game theory, they can "defect" by hiring Seniors that other companies have trained, so they get rid of Juniors. Everyone does this because business is a pop culture, and just as game theory predicts, everyone loses.
@raganwald I liked Ton Roosendaal's attempt at framing this (meaning the nurturing of juniors) in his 2024 keynote as "the volcano model": you make sure talent rises to the top, and in order to prevent the top from getting crowded you help (some of) them find jobs elsewhere https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ5022VaMmA&t=745
(What's even more clever about it in Blender's ca;e is that with this approach Blender becomes a cultural export to other companies)
-
R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
@raganwald Apropos for the ultra-processed food industry, in artificial #USpol
"Early career", meet #EmergingEconomies in #DevelopingCountries, where organic includes well-rooted origins. Makes for a better trajectory than the precipitous fall, the US is championing.
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
Words that stick in my head: always look at what someone could become with the right support and guidance.
-
Words that stick in my head: always look at what someone could become with the right support and guidance.
@emc2 From when I was in leadership:
"What could this team accomplish if I got the rest of the org out the fuck of their way?"
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
@raganwald This was good. When I first interacted with GitHub Copilot, I felt it was like an automated junior developer without an ability to get better. This includes Copilot cutting an pasting code found on StackOverflow and GitHub, just like a junior developer. So, of course, business guys would decide "hey, we can just hire a senior guy to code review the AI code. What could go wrong?"
And no, other AI coding tools are not any better.
-
@raganwald This was good. When I first interacted with GitHub Copilot, I felt it was like an automated junior developer without an ability to get better. This includes Copilot cutting an pasting code found on StackOverflow and GitHub, just like a junior developer. So, of course, business guys would decide "hey, we can just hire a senior guy to code review the AI code. What could go wrong?"
And no, other AI coding tools are not any better.
@gbsills Putting my technical product manager hat on top of my product design hat, if I can ethically do 4x the delivery, I would rather ship four variations of one feature behind feature flags and test the results, than ship four features serially and be too busy shipping the next four to review the results of my experiments.
-
@gbsills Putting my technical product manager hat on top of my product design hat, if I can ethically do 4x the delivery, I would rather ship four variations of one feature behind feature flags and test the results, than ship four features serially and be too busy shipping the next four to review the results of my experiments.
@raganwald Yeah, it is hard for product managers to withstand the pressure to release product quickly. Often, phrases like "shipped on xx/xx/xxxx" and the development run rate $$$ is the only thing the people above them understand.
-
@raganwald Yeah, it is hard for product managers to withstand the pressure to release product quickly. Often, phrases like "shipped on xx/xx/xxxx" and the development run rate $$$ is the only thing the people above them understand.
@gbsills I have spent 25+ years advocating for feedback loops. My go-to slides compared a ballistic approach to air travel (aim very carefully and take EVERYTHING into account at fine levels of detail, then launch and pray) versus flying the aircraft (continuous adjustments in flight).
Got me respect, but in a crunch leadership would... Go ballistic.
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
@raganwald I think it's very important for us to take lessons from the manufacturing industry here. In the US at least, it's incredibly difficult to make anything domestically. Complicating things further, a Smarter Every Day video from several months ago found that, not only have we lost the ability to make things, we've lost the ability to make the things that make things. In his case, he found that finding folks who knew how to make the molds and metal stamping components was difficult to impossible to find domestically.
And we're gladly walking into the same trap with knowledge work. It isn't enough that we're outsourcing software development itself. We're outsourcing the ability to make new software engineers. (And, being an Ops person, I'd argue that we're doing that with all knowledge-based roles in general.)
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
At the same time those same companies tell seniors looking for a new job, that they're too old. Not flexible enough.
Kept up to date for decades in one of the fastest changing industries. Not flexible enough. Sure!
Developed the current technologies, but not flexible enough to use them in their work now. Sure!
Like they think, they don't need software developers at all any more. They're wrong, but sadly confident.
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
This likens back to Netflix (circa 2014) showing they rarely hire Interns/Juniors, to which someone gave a memorable response in the form of "If you don't hire juniors, you don't deserve seniors" in 2018. https://dev.to/isaacdlyman/if-you-dont-hire-juniors-you-dont-deserve-seniors-48kb
The industry has been making moves to avoid hiring Juniors, or training _anyone_, for a long time under the assumption someone else will do it or everyone will "sink or swim" on their own (externalizing the cost to individuals).
-
This likens back to Netflix (circa 2014) showing they rarely hire Interns/Juniors, to which someone gave a memorable response in the form of "If you don't hire juniors, you don't deserve seniors" in 2018. https://dev.to/isaacdlyman/if-you-dont-hire-juniors-you-dont-deserve-seniors-48kb
The industry has been making moves to avoid hiring Juniors, or training _anyone_, for a long time under the assumption someone else will do it or everyone will "sink or swim" on their own (externalizing the cost to individuals).
The idea that Juniors only exist to write boilerplate has always been wrong; similarly the idea we should use AI to generate boilerplate ignores the fact that boilerplate, by and large, should not exist. It is a sign of a bad abstraction, an inefficient protocol, an outdated model, a code base stuck in the mud, or management blocking enhancements. We don't need ways to generate it faster; we need to engineer ways to avoid it entirely.
-
The idea that Juniors only exist to write boilerplate has always been wrong; similarly the idea we should use AI to generate boilerplate ignores the fact that boilerplate, by and large, should not exist. It is a sign of a bad abstraction, an inefficient protocol, an outdated model, a code base stuck in the mud, or management blocking enhancements. We don't need ways to generate it faster; we need to engineer ways to avoid it entirely.
The expectation that folks will learn by osmosis feels like we're continuing to avoid the elephant in the room: The continued lack of regulations, standards, certifications, professional associations, and unions means "Senior Software Engineer" has no actual meaning beyond vibes and feels and we are long past the point where that needs to change. We don't engineer buildings based on vibes, nor should software.
-
The expectation that folks will learn by osmosis feels like we're continuing to avoid the elephant in the room: The continued lack of regulations, standards, certifications, professional associations, and unions means "Senior Software Engineer" has no actual meaning beyond vibes and feels and we are long past the point where that needs to change. We don't engineer buildings based on vibes, nor should software.
The reality is that most software problems are solved; what we're doing is failing to disseminate the solutions as best practices because we rely on word-of-mouth. Companies expect developers to learn on their own time while also running everyone at 120% capacity with deadlines of "due: yesterday" give no time to fix anything and denying any autonomy... and then individual growth becomes stunted.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
A joke I used to tell every coöp student and early-career person I interviewed:
“We only hire senior developers. The trick is, we hire them earlier in their careers.”
The same thing, without trying to be hip:
“Senior engineers are what you get when you hire a junior, give them interesting problems, surround them with people who know more than they do, and wait. That's it.”
AI didn't kill your junior pipeline. You did | Andrew Murphy
AI didn’t kill the junior pipeline; companies did, because someone saw Claude write a for loop and decided that meant they could stop training humans. The result is an industry cheerfully pulling the ladder up behind itself, hollowing out its seniors, and outsourcing its entire talent strategy to vendors that will eventually triple the price. If you don’t hire juniors now, don’t act surprised in five years when you’re surrounded by AI-generated code nobody understands and trying to buy senior engineers from a market everyone else forgot to replenish.
Andrew Murphy (andrewmurphy.io)
@raganwald@social.bau-ha.us "Every senior engineer alive today got their start doing the exact grunt work they're now saying juniors don't need to do. That's not progress. That's pulling the ladder up behind you."
