Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer.

I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
32 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

    I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer. yeah, there are other more serious atrocities, but sinking a defenseless vessel on the high seas without declaring war and without giving it a chance to surrender is not just wrong and not just a war crime. it's cowardly, dishonorable, and goes against **centuries** of naval tradition and culture. it's exceptionally dark and twisted.

    clarablackink@writing.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    clarablackink@writing.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    clarablackink@writing.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    @peter Behind the Bastards covered Hegseth's book last year in an episode. In the book he lays out exactly how he'll run things and why. Its a useful episode.

    The thing people still refuse to reckon with is that Hegseth, Elliot Rodgers, & Harris and Klebold, and all the other violence of recent decades come from the same place. The same toxic, hurting, loser position of "if only I did this, I'd win, I'd show them".

    We didn't solve school shootings but we should have. Now these boys are men*.

    clarablackink@writing.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

      I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer. yeah, there are other more serious atrocities, but sinking a defenseless vessel on the high seas without declaring war and without giving it a chance to surrender is not just wrong and not just a war crime. it's cowardly, dishonorable, and goes against **centuries** of naval tradition and culture. it's exceptionally dark and twisted.

      meriksson@swecyb.comM This user is from outside of this forum
      meriksson@swecyb.comM This user is from outside of this forum
      meriksson@swecyb.com
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      @peter Well, as much as it hurts to realize it’s exactly in line with what to expect from the people in charge.

      It’s rare with bullies that are also psycopaths but they obviously exist,

      The real question is why is this madness allowed to continue?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • clarablackink@writing.exchangeC clarablackink@writing.exchange

        @peter Behind the Bastards covered Hegseth's book last year in an episode. In the book he lays out exactly how he'll run things and why. Its a useful episode.

        The thing people still refuse to reckon with is that Hegseth, Elliot Rodgers, & Harris and Klebold, and all the other violence of recent decades come from the same place. The same toxic, hurting, loser position of "if only I did this, I'd win, I'd show them".

        We didn't solve school shootings but we should have. Now these boys are men*.

        clarablackink@writing.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        clarablackink@writing.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        clarablackink@writing.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        @peter *Character limit neccessitated brevity and lack of clarity.

        What I mean is that, the mindset of folks like the shooters I mentioned is present in a lot of grown men like Hegseth. They outgrew schools but they still apply the ideas in manifestos (I've read Rodgers' because it happened at my school).

        And now they're in politics and the military.

        They go after the helpless and vulnerable because it makes them feel strong. Like they're proving a point.

        clarablackink@writing.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • clarablackink@writing.exchangeC clarablackink@writing.exchange

          @peter *Character limit neccessitated brevity and lack of clarity.

          What I mean is that, the mindset of folks like the shooters I mentioned is present in a lot of grown men like Hegseth. They outgrew schools but they still apply the ideas in manifestos (I've read Rodgers' because it happened at my school).

          And now they're in politics and the military.

          They go after the helpless and vulnerable because it makes them feel strong. Like they're proving a point.

          clarablackink@writing.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          clarablackink@writing.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          clarablackink@writing.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @peter In his book, Hegseth thinks we lost the wars in the Middle East because we weren't allowed to commit war crimes. He thinks that war crimes are stays on power rather than the warnings of ultimate doom that they are.

          A war crime is "don't put your hand on the hot stove, you'll burn yourself" but he thinks there's some winning secret there.

          *edited a typo

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

            I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer. yeah, there are other more serious atrocities, but sinking a defenseless vessel on the high seas without declaring war and without giving it a chance to surrender is not just wrong and not just a war crime. it's cowardly, dishonorable, and goes against **centuries** of naval tradition and culture. it's exceptionally dark and twisted.

            timagal@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            timagal@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            timagal@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            @peter One of many war crimes. If these two dictators, these new Hilter/Mussolini arrogance is not stopped, the entire world is going to suffer nuclear fallout.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

              I think the Democrats need to make it clear that when they take power, they are going to hold generals and admirals personally accountable for what their troops have done. like, some very powerful guys need to be stripped of their ranks, court martialed, and imprisoned.

              my fear is that the Democrats are not promising to do that because they don't intend to do that.

              davevolek@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              davevolek@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              davevolek@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              @peter

              I fear you are right. The D's will have their hands full trying to prosecute the R kleptocrats. And they cannot risk alienating the military, who were, essentially, following orders.

              You might be interested in my Medium article about why the D's cannot save the USA:

              Just a moment...

              favicon

              (medium.com)

              We need a new way. Follow my byline if you are interested.

              Link Preview Image
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • peter@thepit.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                peter@thepit.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                peter@thepit.social
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                @gotofritz it was unarmed because it was participating in naval exercises, at India's invitation. the US was also supposed to participate, and knew it was unarmed.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

                  I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer. yeah, there are other more serious atrocities, but sinking a defenseless vessel on the high seas without declaring war and without giving it a chance to surrender is not just wrong and not just a war crime. it's cowardly, dishonorable, and goes against **centuries** of naval tradition and culture. it's exceptionally dark and twisted.

                  frieke72@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  frieke72@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  frieke72@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @peter that's evangelical christians at the country's (and military?!) helm for you

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • eliasr@social.librem.oneE eliasr@social.librem.one

                    @peter

                    > hold generals and admirals personally accountable

                    What is the appropriate action to take for a general who gets an order like "sink that ship now" from the commander in chief? What exactly is the right thing to do, and are there examples of people who did the right thing in that situation?

                    I suppose the general should say "sinking that ship in the way this order says would be a war crime, so I'm not going to do it." If a general says that, then what happens next?

                    richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    richardwrightfan@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    @eliasr @peter
                    The problem is that through firings, forced "voluntary" retirements, and sidelining, Trump and Hegseth have mostly purged the senior ranks of those who would push back. But it's not unheard of for men/women of honor to do the right thing, even if it means risking punishment... or death👇🏿
                    "Op-Ed: A forgotten hero stopped the My Lai massacre 50 years ago today" https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-wiener-my-lai-hugh-thompson-20180316-story.html

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

                      I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer. yeah, there are other more serious atrocities, but sinking a defenseless vessel on the high seas without declaring war and without giving it a chance to surrender is not just wrong and not just a war crime. it's cowardly, dishonorable, and goes against **centuries** of naval tradition and culture. it's exceptionally dark and twisted.

                      colesstreetpothole@weatherishappening.networkC This user is from outside of this forum
                      colesstreetpothole@weatherishappening.networkC This user is from outside of this forum
                      colesstreetpothole@weatherishappening.network
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @peter I was thinking of the commander and officers on that sub. Did they want to sink that ship? Did they think it was justified?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • peter@thepit.socialP peter@thepit.social

                        I think the thing that bothers me most right now is the sinking of that Iranian destroyer. yeah, there are other more serious atrocities, but sinking a defenseless vessel on the high seas without declaring war and without giving it a chance to surrender is not just wrong and not just a war crime. it's cowardly, dishonorable, and goes against **centuries** of naval tradition and culture. it's exceptionally dark and twisted.

                        flashmobofone@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        flashmobofone@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        flashmobofone@mstdn.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        @peter What bothers me most is how routine all of this has become.

                        Even a token declaration of war, that we know would pass in Congress anyway, is too much to ask. And the same people standing aside will be reelected en masse in a few months.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • eliasr@social.librem.oneE eliasr@social.librem.one

                          @peter

                          > refusing an illegal order is a requirement under the uniform code of conduct

                          Interesting. Does that apply on all levels, not only for generals and admirals but all ranks all the way down to the private soldiers?

                          richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          richardwrightfan@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          @eliasr @peter
                          In a word... YES

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT toerror@mastodon.gamedev.place

                            @peter @eliasr I've heard that that applies to domestic issues - i.e, being told to fire on US citizens, but does not apply for overseas stuff.

                            richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            richardwrightfan@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            @toerror @peter @eliasr
                            That's not true. Not only are servicemembers subject to the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice), but there are also rules of engagement for combat situations, and specific regulations governing servicemembers stationed or deployed overseas.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • infoseepage@mastodon.socialI infoseepage@mastodon.social

                              @Illuminatus @peter I feel zero sympathy at all for the commander of that sub, who issued that order. Maybe they were given direct orders to sail to such and such a location and destroy a particular vessel without knowing anything beyond that, but they either decided to not pick up survivors of their own volition or obeyed an order to destroy the vessel, film the act (which also serves to have documented it as a crime) and not pick up survivors.

                              richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              richardwrightfan@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              richardwrightfan@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              @Infoseepage @Illuminatus @peter
                              💯💯💯💯‼️

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT toerror@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                @peter @eliasr I've heard that that applies to domestic issues - i.e, being told to fire on US citizens, but does not apply for overseas stuff.

                                mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mycotropic@beige.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                @toerror @peter @eliasr

                                Refusing an illegal order is your duty as a soldier; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_massacre

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • guillotine_jones@beige.partyG guillotine_jones@beige.party

                                  @peter
                                  One of the problems with the GOP/MAGA/Trump party is that too many of the people in it root for the Nazis while watching WWII movies.

                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rickd6@mstdn.ca
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #32

                                  @peter @Guillotine_Jones WWII movies produced by the USA designed as overblown heroic/patriotic propaganda. Believing that the USA single handily won the war is absurd and part of the reason for their inflated military ego.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups