Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
22 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
    neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
    neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

    * pay Google
    * give government ID to Google
    * agree to Google terms and conditions

    People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

    e.g. via F-Droid.

    We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

    Link Preview Image
    Keep Android Open

    Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

    favicon

    (keepandroidopen.org)

    ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.ukB keefjudge@mastodon.socialK illumniscate@mastodon.educationI elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE wtrmt@mastodon.socialW 9 Replies Last reply
    4
    0
    • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

      People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

      * pay Google
      * give government ID to Google
      * agree to Google terms and conditions

      People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

      e.g. via F-Droid.

      We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

      Link Preview Image
      Keep Android Open

      Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

      favicon

      (keepandroidopen.org)

      ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
      ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
      ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.uk
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @neil missing "id" from second bullet point?

      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.ukB ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.uk

        @neil missing "id" from second bullet point?

        neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
        neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
        neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @ben I removed "ID" and not "with" when I copy-edited it. Oops!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

          People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

          * pay Google
          * give government ID to Google
          * agree to Google terms and conditions

          People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

          e.g. via F-Droid.

          We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

          Link Preview Image
          Keep Android Open

          Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

          favicon

          (keepandroidopen.org)

          keefjudge@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          keefjudge@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          keefjudge@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @neil I'm sure you're already aware Epic Games have an ongoing legal battle with Google/Apple about putting their own store on Android/iOS based on the same principles.

          neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • keefjudge@mastodon.socialK keefjudge@mastodon.social

            @neil I'm sure you're already aware Epic Games have an ongoing legal battle with Google/Apple about putting their own store on Android/iOS based on the same principles.

            neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
            neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
            neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @KeefJudge Indeed 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

              People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

              * pay Google
              * give government ID to Google
              * agree to Google terms and conditions

              People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

              e.g. via F-Droid.

              We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

              Link Preview Image
              Keep Android Open

              Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

              favicon

              (keepandroidopen.org)

              illumniscate@mastodon.educationI This user is from outside of this forum
              illumniscate@mastodon.educationI This user is from outside of this forum
              illumniscate@mastodon.education
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @neil

              @GrapheneOS Do you have plans or announcements regarding this?

              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
              • illumniscate@mastodon.educationI illumniscate@mastodon.education

                @neil

                @GrapheneOS Do you have plans or announcements regarding this?

                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @illumniscate @neil It doesn't directly impact GrapheneOS. It won't have this enforcement. We'd have to go out of the way to make integration with an opt-in toggle for it and aren't interested in it rather than other approaches to verifying app authenticity/trustworthiness.

                j2@circumstances.runJ E 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                  @illumniscate @neil It doesn't directly impact GrapheneOS. It won't have this enforcement. We'd have to go out of the way to make integration with an opt-in toggle for it and aren't interested in it rather than other approaches to verifying app authenticity/trustworthiness.

                  j2@circumstances.runJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  j2@circumstances.runJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  j2@circumstances.run
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil Thank you for confirming that. I assume it's the same then for Murena? @gael

                  xtreix@infosec.exchangeX grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                    @illumniscate @neil It doesn't directly impact GrapheneOS. It won't have this enforcement. We'd have to go out of the way to make integration with an opt-in toggle for it and aren't interested in it rather than other approaches to verifying app authenticity/trustworthiness.

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil are you guys going to be adversely impacted by the updated semi-annual release schedule for AOSP, assuming Google's still planning that change?

                    xtreix@infosec.exchangeX 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                    • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                      People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                      * pay Google
                      * give government ID to Google
                      * agree to Google terms and conditions

                      People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                      e.g. via F-Droid.

                      We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Keep Android Open

                      Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                      favicon

                      (keepandroidopen.org)

                      elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                      elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                      elbeetoots@mastodon.nl
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @neil "You will ride a unicycle, wear a pink dress and clown shoes while developing your app!"

                      Link Preview Image
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                        People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                        * pay Google
                        * give government ID to Google
                        * agree to Google terms and conditions

                        People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                        e.g. via F-Droid.

                        We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Keep Android Open

                        Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                        favicon

                        (keepandroidopen.org)

                        wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wtrmt@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @neil I remember when Apple launched the Apple Store and how I felt about it:

                        “Wait, what?!: do they own my device and my relationship with the people that make the software?!”

                        “Didn’t I pay for this thing?”

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                          People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                          * pay Google
                          * give government ID to Google
                          * agree to Google terms and conditions

                          People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                          e.g. via F-Droid.

                          We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Keep Android Open

                          Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                          favicon

                          (keepandroidopen.org)

                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @neil During the last five years, I spent a fairly significant amount of time developing an android app. I got a developer account and had an alpha release on the play store.
                          Unfortunately, personal circumstances took my focus away from it for some time, and by the time I got back to it, my account had been deleted after I hadn't responded to one of their requests.

                          I found the sign up process unpleasant and intrusive, so the idea of going through it again is not appealing. Naturally, I thought about putting my app on another store. The idea of that company being in control of what I can provide to other people to run on their devices was enough to make me quit. I won't be releasing my work as long as this restriction is being held over us.

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

                            @neil During the last five years, I spent a fairly significant amount of time developing an android app. I got a developer account and had an alpha release on the play store.
                            Unfortunately, personal circumstances took my focus away from it for some time, and by the time I got back to it, my account had been deleted after I hadn't responded to one of their requests.

                            I found the sign up process unpleasant and intrusive, so the idea of going through it again is not appealing. Naturally, I thought about putting my app on another store. The idea of that company being in control of what I can provide to other people to run on their devices was enough to make me quit. I won't be releasing my work as long as this restriction is being held over us.

                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @neil I should add: even having said all that, I can at least acknowledge that there is a case for IDs being checked before permitting apps to ship via their own store. I wish it wasn't the same company that's harvesting so much other personal data, but I do think it is preferable that apps are not published with no verified responsible person.

                            Once again, I'd be a lot more comfortable if identity verification could be done by a provider of my choice with only a token being passed to the store.

                            neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

                              @neil I should add: even having said all that, I can at least acknowledge that there is a case for IDs being checked before permitting apps to ship via their own store. I wish it wasn't the same company that's harvesting so much other personal data, but I do think it is preferable that apps are not published with no verified responsible person.

                              Once again, I'd be a lot more comfortable if identity verification could be done by a provider of my choice with only a token being passed to the store.

                              neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                              neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                              neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @GerardThornley I am far less opinionated about whatever rules Google puts in place for Google's own app store.

                              My focus is really in ensuring that privacy respecting, alternatives exist, as this is good for both developers and users.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                                @GerardThornley I am far less opinionated about whatever rules Google puts in place for Google's own app store.

                                My focus is really in ensuring that privacy respecting, alternatives exist, as this is good for both developers and users.

                                G This user is from outside of this forum
                                G This user is from outside of this forum
                                gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @neil Yes, quite. And that is what I thought your view would be.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                                  People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                                  * pay Google
                                  * give government ID to Google
                                  * agree to Google terms and conditions

                                  People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                                  e.g. via F-Droid.

                                  We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Keep Android Open

                                  Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                                  favicon

                                  (keepandroidopen.org)

                                  irelephant@app.wafrn.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  irelephant@app.wafrn.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  irelephant@app.wafrn.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Don't you have to agree to like 20 pages of terms and conditions before installing the sdks for android?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                                    People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                                    * pay Google
                                    * give government ID to Google
                                    * agree to Google terms and conditions

                                    People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                                    e.g. via F-Droid.

                                    We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Keep Android Open

                                    Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                                    favicon

                                    (keepandroidopen.org)

                                    kw217@mathstodon.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kw217@mathstodon.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kw217@mathstodon.xyz
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @neil thanks; the CMA form for reporting this in the UK was simple and easy, like most of the gov.uk sites. Done.

                                    neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kw217@mathstodon.xyzK kw217@mathstodon.xyz

                                      @neil thanks; the CMA form for reporting this in the UK was simple and easy, like most of the gov.uk sites. Done.

                                      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @kw217 Excellent!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • j2@circumstances.runJ j2@circumstances.run

                                        @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil Thank you for confirming that. I assume it's the same then for Murena? @gael

                                        xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                                        xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                                        xtreix@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @j2 @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil @gael Please note that Murena is a scam, this is not an honest project and it's dangerous to use it. https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        ewwlo

                                        Telling the truth about ewwlo since 2018.

                                        favicon

                                        (ewwlo.void.partidopirata.com.ar)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo

                                          @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil are you guys going to be adversely impacted by the updated semi-annual release schedule for AOSP, assuming Google's still planning that change?

                                          xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                                          xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                                          xtreix@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @eigen @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil GrapheneOS is not affected by update issues, and thanks to their collaboration with a major Android OEM since June 2025, GrapheneOS can offer security preview releases. https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/27068-grapheneos-security-preview-releases

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups