Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
22 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    @illumniscate @neil It doesn't directly impact GrapheneOS. It won't have this enforcement. We'd have to go out of the way to make integration with an opt-in toggle for it and aren't interested in it rather than other approaches to verifying app authenticity/trustworthiness.

    E This user is from outside of this forum
    E This user is from outside of this forum
    eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil are you guys going to be adversely impacted by the updated semi-annual release schedule for AOSP, assuming Google's still planning that change?

    xtreix@infosec.exchangeX 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
    • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

      People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

      * pay Google
      * give government ID to Google
      * agree to Google terms and conditions

      People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

      e.g. via F-Droid.

      We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

      Link Preview Image
      Keep Android Open

      Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

      favicon

      (keepandroidopen.org)

      elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
      elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
      elbeetoots@mastodon.nl
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @neil "You will ride a unicycle, wear a pink dress and clown shoes while developing your app!"

      Link Preview Image
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

        People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

        * pay Google
        * give government ID to Google
        * agree to Google terms and conditions

        People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

        e.g. via F-Droid.

        We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

        Link Preview Image
        Keep Android Open

        Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

        favicon

        (keepandroidopen.org)

        wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wtrmt@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @neil I remember when Apple launched the Apple Store and how I felt about it:

        “Wait, what?!: do they own my device and my relationship with the people that make the software?!”

        “Didn’t I pay for this thing?”

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

          People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

          * pay Google
          * give government ID to Google
          * agree to Google terms and conditions

          People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

          e.g. via F-Droid.

          We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

          Link Preview Image
          Keep Android Open

          Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

          favicon

          (keepandroidopen.org)

          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @neil During the last five years, I spent a fairly significant amount of time developing an android app. I got a developer account and had an alpha release on the play store.
          Unfortunately, personal circumstances took my focus away from it for some time, and by the time I got back to it, my account had been deleted after I hadn't responded to one of their requests.

          I found the sign up process unpleasant and intrusive, so the idea of going through it again is not appealing. Naturally, I thought about putting my app on another store. The idea of that company being in control of what I can provide to other people to run on their devices was enough to make me quit. I won't be releasing my work as long as this restriction is being held over us.

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

            @neil During the last five years, I spent a fairly significant amount of time developing an android app. I got a developer account and had an alpha release on the play store.
            Unfortunately, personal circumstances took my focus away from it for some time, and by the time I got back to it, my account had been deleted after I hadn't responded to one of their requests.

            I found the sign up process unpleasant and intrusive, so the idea of going through it again is not appealing. Naturally, I thought about putting my app on another store. The idea of that company being in control of what I can provide to other people to run on their devices was enough to make me quit. I won't be releasing my work as long as this restriction is being held over us.

            G This user is from outside of this forum
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @neil I should add: even having said all that, I can at least acknowledge that there is a case for IDs being checked before permitting apps to ship via their own store. I wish it wasn't the same company that's harvesting so much other personal data, but I do think it is preferable that apps are not published with no verified responsible person.

            Once again, I'd be a lot more comfortable if identity verification could be done by a provider of my choice with only a token being passed to the store.

            neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

              @neil I should add: even having said all that, I can at least acknowledge that there is a case for IDs being checked before permitting apps to ship via their own store. I wish it wasn't the same company that's harvesting so much other personal data, but I do think it is preferable that apps are not published with no verified responsible person.

              Once again, I'd be a lot more comfortable if identity verification could be done by a provider of my choice with only a token being passed to the store.

              neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
              neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
              neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @GerardThornley I am far less opinionated about whatever rules Google puts in place for Google's own app store.

              My focus is really in ensuring that privacy respecting, alternatives exist, as this is good for both developers and users.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                @GerardThornley I am far less opinionated about whatever rules Google puts in place for Google's own app store.

                My focus is really in ensuring that privacy respecting, alternatives exist, as this is good for both developers and users.

                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @neil Yes, quite. And that is what I thought your view would be.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                  People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                  * pay Google
                  * give government ID to Google
                  * agree to Google terms and conditions

                  People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                  e.g. via F-Droid.

                  We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Keep Android Open

                  Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                  favicon

                  (keepandroidopen.org)

                  irelephant@app.wafrn.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                  irelephant@app.wafrn.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                  irelephant@app.wafrn.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  Don't you have to agree to like 20 pages of terms and conditions before installing the sdks for android?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                    People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                    * pay Google
                    * give government ID to Google
                    * agree to Google terms and conditions

                    People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                    e.g. via F-Droid.

                    We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Keep Android Open

                    Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                    favicon

                    (keepandroidopen.org)

                    kw217@mathstodon.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kw217@mathstodon.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kw217@mathstodon.xyz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @neil thanks; the CMA form for reporting this in the UK was simple and easy, like most of the gov.uk sites. Done.

                    neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kw217@mathstodon.xyzK kw217@mathstodon.xyz

                      @neil thanks; the CMA form for reporting this in the UK was simple and easy, like most of the gov.uk sites. Done.

                      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                      neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @kw217 Excellent!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • j2@circumstances.runJ j2@circumstances.run

                        @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil Thank you for confirming that. I assume it's the same then for Murena? @gael

                        xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xtreix@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @j2 @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil @gael Please note that Murena is a scam, this is not an honest project and it's dangerous to use it. https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private

                        Link Preview Image
                        ewwlo

                        Telling the truth about ewwlo since 2018.

                        favicon

                        (ewwlo.void.partidopirata.com.ar)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo

                          @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil are you guys going to be adversely impacted by the updated semi-annual release schedule for AOSP, assuming Google's still planning that change?

                          xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                          xtreix@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                          xtreix@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @eigen @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil GrapheneOS is not affected by update issues, and thanks to their collaboration with a major Android OEM since June 2025, GrapheneOS can offer security preview releases. https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/27068-grapheneos-security-preview-releases

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                            People should be able to write software for Android, and distribute it outside Google's Play store, without having to:

                            * pay Google
                            * give government ID to Google
                            * agree to Google terms and conditions

                            People should be able to install the software they want on their phone, from sources other than Google's Play store, without having to jump through Google-imposed hoops.

                            e.g. via F-Droid.

                            We've got until September this year to stop Google squeezing the open Android ecosystem.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Keep Android Open

                            Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

                            favicon

                            (keepandroidopen.org)

                            trimtab@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            trimtab@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            trimtab@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @neil
                            Not saying i agree with Google. But how is the OS community going to fight the forces of evil trying to hijack our code?

                            Between malware labs, ai slop and slop powered malware labs, i am worried. The idea of making sure real accountable humans are writing honest code seems appealing....

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                            • j2@circumstances.runJ j2@circumstances.run

                              @GrapheneOS @illumniscate @neil Thank you for confirming that. I assume it's the same then for Murena? @gael

                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @j2 @illumniscate @neil Gaël Duval has extensively spread misinformation about GrapheneOS and /e/ to falsely market his products for his for-profit company. He has engaged in extensive libel and harassment towards our team. Here's an example of him linking to harassment content based on fabrications on a blatant neo-nazi conspiracy website, which he has done repeatedly:

                              https://archive.is/SWXPJ
                              https://archive.is/n4yTO

                              Please don't mention him in replies to us or otherwise involve him.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafeS stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups