"how to not regret c2s"w.on-t.work/activitypub/c2smy opinions about how activitypub c2s ought to be implemented, probably with way too much snark for anyone to take it seriously.

[jb@waf.moe]

lexicons do have unrestricted json, lexicon validation are there but its not required

[kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work]

@jb no i think validation is important

there is an unknown type but

The (nested) contents of the data object must still be valid under the atproto data model. For example, it should not contain floats. Nested compound types like blobs and CID links should be validated and transformed as expected.

[trwnh@mastodon.social]

@kopper nah it's good shit. i've been meaning to compile all my thoughts on the subject but you basically did it for me with this piece