Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I went on Facebook (I know I know I know) and they are selling tinfoil hats.

I went on Facebook (I know I know I know) and they are selling tinfoil hats.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
197 Posts 119 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    @oldclumsy_nowmad @muddle

    There aren't any common waves that could hurt your brain.

    BUT

    If you want to know about something invisible, that most people don't know about that can impact your health in persistent mild but still bad ways? Look up "infrasound" --

    burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
    burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
    burnitdown@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #163

    @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social @muddle@infosec.exchange

    it depends on the strength and type of signal, and how close you are to the source. an unshielded magnetron from a microwave oven will definitely cook you, including your brain. that's why there are warning signs to not stand in front of microwave radio dishes.

    samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      I went on Facebook (I know I know I know) and they are selling tinfoil hats.

      The "Wavestopper" costs $88 Free Shipping!

      (I checked. It is not an April Fools joke. Selling to people with "brain fog" feels a little predatory to me.)

      blp@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
      blp@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
      blp@framapiaf.org
      wrote last edited by
      #164

      @futurebird The silver also helps against werewolves.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        @oldclumsy_nowmad @Anke @muddle

        I wonder if one could channel the feeling many people have that "the world is slowly killing me somehow" into things like insisting that new highways don't send horrible rumbling sounds into surrounding neighborhoods?

        But CO2 is also invisible and no one wants to care about that...

        burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
        burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
        burnitdown@beige.party
        wrote last edited by
        #165

        @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social @Anke @muddle@infosec.exchange

        living next to a busy road is very stressful.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • heathen_cat@furs.socialH heathen_cat@furs.social

          @futurebird
          Sadly, between COVID and aging, there's probably going to be a wave of scam products in the future for brain fog. Nutropics, supplements, silver embedded clothing, just like copper was the woo-woo for arthritis.

          johnzajac@dice.campJ This user is from outside of this forum
          johnzajac@dice.campJ This user is from outside of this forum
          johnzajac@dice.camp
          wrote last edited by
          #166

          @heathen_cat @futurebird

          There are already hundreds of "brain fog" and "shortness of breath" and "fatigue" snake oils bc of the combination of widespread and surging LC and official/bipartisan minimizing of LC. 🤷🏼‍♂️

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            I went on Facebook (I know I know I know) and they are selling tinfoil hats.

            The "Wavestopper" costs $88 Free Shipping!

            (I checked. It is not an April Fools joke. Selling to people with "brain fog" feels a little predatory to me.)

            beltliner403@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
            beltliner403@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
            beltliner403@mastodon.online
            wrote last edited by
            #167

            @futurebird I take it Wade Tillman was unavailable to provide an endorsement.

            #Watchmen #LookingGlass #Reflectatine

            Just a moment...

            favicon

            (watchmen.fandom.com)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG ggmcbg@mstdn.plus

              @futurebird

              If I was just a skosh more evil I'd be selling all kinds of geegaws and doodads to the superstitious New-age Dark Age dipshits.

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              pepperbike@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #168

              @GGMcBG @futurebird It is immoral to let stupid people keep their money.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • josh0@babka.socialJ josh0@babka.social

                @futurebird I like mine better. Much more stylish.

                bitprophet@social.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
                bitprophet@social.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
                bitprophet@social.coop
                wrote last edited by
                #169

                @josh0 @futurebird love some good ARSE swag!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • draken@masto.nycD draken@masto.nyc

                  @futurebird
                  ...that price tag should be a dead giveaway as to their target demographic.

                  clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  clintruin@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #170

                  @draken @futurebird

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                    I went on Facebook (I know I know I know) and they are selling tinfoil hats.

                    The "Wavestopper" costs $88 Free Shipping!

                    (I checked. It is not an April Fools joke. Selling to people with "brain fog" feels a little predatory to me.)

                    wellingtonrock@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wellingtonrock@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wellingtonrock@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #171

                    @futurebird
                    Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa! Haahaahaa!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • burnitdown@beige.partyB burnitdown@beige.party

                      @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social @muddle@infosec.exchange

                      it depends on the strength and type of signal, and how close you are to the source. an unshielded magnetron from a microwave oven will definitely cook you, including your brain. that's why there are warning signs to not stand in front of microwave radio dishes.

                      samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                      samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                      samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #172

                      @burnitdown @futurebird Its also interesting that different parts of the body are affected differently by microwaves. One of the more vulnerable parts are the eyes. So don't watch the food cook...

                      burnitdown@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL linuxandyarn@hachyderm.io

                        @clayfoot @futurebird Do they sell chaps to go with their chafes?

                        clayfoot@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        clayfoot@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        clayfoot@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #173

                        @linuxandyarn @futurebird Well that's just silly

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M muddle@infosec.exchange

                          @adrake @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad I was thinking about that, and the fact that microwave ovens and wifi both use 2.4GHz. I did a quick search to try to find out the relative power levels. Ovens are easy: they're going to be around 800W~2kW. Unfortunately, the search results were suggesting WiFi pumps out 100--200W. Scary, if true. In fact, the actual power output is in the 20-100mW (*milli-*Watt) range.

                          I didn't really want to go there because it could play into the hands of those people that want to convince us that Wi-Fi (or 5G or whatever) is making us sick, but the 99.7% shielding figure is good to know. It would mean, roughly, that a 1KW microwave oven with proper shielding is pumping out around 10 times as much radiation as a local Wi-Fi router (1W compared to 100mW).

                          People pushing conspiracy theories about this is bad enough, but when search engines are promoting figures that are 3 orders of magnitude off, well... that's also very worrying. (and that's before we even get into LLMs...)

                          adrake@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          adrake@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          adrake@sfba.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #174

                          @muddle @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad the FCC limit on 2.4GHz transmitters is 1W for sufficiently spread-spectrum devices (including WiFi). The maximum emissions in any particular direction are capped at a level equivalent to a 4W omnidirectional antenna (this equivalent measurement is called EIRP). Most wifi devices operate well below that level since it's rough on battery life.

                          Microwave ovens are limited by FDA to leaking a max of 5mW/cm^2 from any point on the oven's surface (measured 2in away). That works out to be a little below the power density you get from a worst-case WiFi transmitter at 3 inches away.

                          The 99.7 number is the claimed shielding performance of the hat, not any regulations.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M muddle@infosec.exchange

                            @oldclumsy_nowmad @futurebird I was going to look it up myself but realised the futility of it. IEEE is not a military organisation and real military standards tend to start with MIL, I think. Even if not, that whole line at the bottom screams fake.

                            samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                            samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                            samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #175

                            @muddle @oldclumsy_nowmad @futurebird IEEE 299 is about standard measurement practice

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

                              @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad @muddle RF *can* hurt you if its high enough power, but that’s generally limited to labs and microwave ovens, not what’s emitted by cell phones

                              …or anywhere outdoors. you might get a sunburn

                              samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                              samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                              samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #176

                              @cinebox @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad @muddle or worse...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • adrake@sfba.socialA adrake@sfba.social

                                @muddle @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad the FCC limit on 2.4GHz transmitters is 1W for sufficiently spread-spectrum devices (including WiFi). The maximum emissions in any particular direction are capped at a level equivalent to a 4W omnidirectional antenna (this equivalent measurement is called EIRP). Most wifi devices operate well below that level since it's rough on battery life.

                                Microwave ovens are limited by FDA to leaking a max of 5mW/cm^2 from any point on the oven's surface (measured 2in away). That works out to be a little below the power density you get from a worst-case WiFi transmitter at 3 inches away.

                                The 99.7 number is the claimed shielding performance of the hat, not any regulations.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                muddle@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #177

                                @adrake @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad ah, I misread what you said about 99.7% initially. I didn't realise you were talking about the hat. So I guess I overestimated the effectiveness of the shielding and, hence, also overestimated the leakage

                                I also did look up some more reputable info on max wireless tx power and was surprised to find that in some countries it can even go up to 4W (which tallies with what you said):

                                Link Preview Image
                                Maximum wifi transmission power per country

                                favicon

                                Wolph (w.wol.ph)

                                Taken together, wifi and ovens seem to be roughly comparable rather than there being the orders-of-magnitude differences that I expected (with ovens emitting more radiation).

                                Thanks for the correction. I guess I'll have to retire my "but microwaves leak more energy" argument when dealing with (literal) tinfoil hatters...

                                adrake@sfba.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                  I went on Facebook (I know I know I know) and they are selling tinfoil hats.

                                  The "Wavestopper" costs $88 Free Shipping!

                                  (I checked. It is not an April Fools joke. Selling to people with "brain fog" feels a little predatory to me.)

                                  makerblock@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  makerblock@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  makerblock@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #178

                                  RE: https://sauropods.win/@futurebird/116342201450394205

                                  Now, I'm not in favor of spam / scam callers...

                                  But, I somehow feel less bad about the idea of someone selling snake oil brand snake oil clearly labeling the contents as snake oil (even if there are some outlandish claims) and letting fools and their money be parted?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                    @oldclumsy_nowmad @Anke @muddle

                                    I'm interested in noise pollution and light pollution. Light pollution is horrible for insects. (and birds) Noise pollution is bad for people.

                                    We could have less loud, dark at night (but still safe) cities and towns.

                                    da_gut@dice.campD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    da_gut@dice.campD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    da_gut@dice.camp
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #179

                                    @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad @Anke @muddle

                                    Light pollution is bad for plants as well. Let’s see if I can find that link.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Street light choice matters: impacts of presence and color on wild plants

                                    bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by openRxiv, a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing scientific communication

                                    favicon

                                    bioRxiv (www.biorxiv.org)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.space

                                      @burnitdown @futurebird Its also interesting that different parts of the body are affected differently by microwaves. One of the more vulnerable parts are the eyes. So don't watch the food cook...

                                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burnitdown@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #180

                                      @SamanthaJaneSmith @futurebird the shielding is there so you don't cook yourself at all. without it, you would need to stand dozens of metres away to operate the microwave.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                        Do you think the people selling this are laughing at their customers or are they into it?

                                        It's like a damn joke.

                                        linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        linuxandyarn@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #181

                                        @futurebird They're selling it for $88? If they're not laughing, they're seig heiling at trump rallies.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M muddle@infosec.exchange

                                          @adrake @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad ah, I misread what you said about 99.7% initially. I didn't realise you were talking about the hat. So I guess I overestimated the effectiveness of the shielding and, hence, also overestimated the leakage

                                          I also did look up some more reputable info on max wireless tx power and was surprised to find that in some countries it can even go up to 4W (which tallies with what you said):

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Maximum wifi transmission power per country

                                          favicon

                                          Wolph (w.wol.ph)

                                          Taken together, wifi and ovens seem to be roughly comparable rather than there being the orders-of-magnitude differences that I expected (with ovens emitting more radiation).

                                          Thanks for the correction. I guess I'll have to retire my "but microwaves leak more energy" argument when dealing with (literal) tinfoil hatters...

                                          adrake@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          adrake@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          adrake@sfba.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #182

                                          @muddle @futurebird @oldclumsy_nowmad I think it's not accidental that they're comparable. Both are expected to be used by the general population with no safety training, so both should have limits that are safe under most circumstances.

                                          Licensed users have different rules. Amateur radio operators are licensed to transmit at up to 1500W (!) on most of the 2.4GHz band, but they take on the legal burden of ensuring that whatever they do doesn't expose others to unsafe levels of emissions.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups