Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Classical Chinese textbook example: 彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。

Classical Chinese textbook example: 彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
classicalchinesphilosophy
18 Posts 11 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • yoxem@sns.kianting.infoY yoxem@sns.kianting.info
    @dramforever @0xabad1dea 惹是生非also permitted
    dramforever@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dramforever@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dramforever@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @yoxem @0xabad1dea just corrected myself i meant to type that lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      Classical Chinese textbook example: 彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。

      me: there’s not a single concrete word in that entire sentence

      Next example: 是是非非

      me: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ this is why people keep trying to ban philosophy

      (The first is “that too is true or false; this too is true or false” and the second doesn’t translate in a way that captures the blunt reduplication of literally “this-is this-is is-not is-not” but roughly “finding true things to be true and false things to be false”)

      #classicalchinese #philosophy

      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      19th century western philosophers: Chinese philosophy is fundamentally unserious because their language doesn't even have the word "is"

      me, having to Cope with Xunzi going on about is-ing the is-ness:

      #classicalchinese #philosophy

      endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        19th century western philosophers: Chinese philosophy is fundamentally unserious because their language doesn't even have the word "is"

        me, having to Cope with Xunzi going on about is-ing the is-ness:

        #classicalchinese #philosophy

        endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
        endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
        endrift@social.treehouse.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @0xabad1dea don't mind me looking up Chinese and how it kinda does but doesn't have a copula

        endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE endrift@social.treehouse.systems

          @0xabad1dea don't mind me looking up Chinese and how it kinda does but doesn't have a copula

          endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
          endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
          endrift@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @0xabad1dea this is very different than I'm used to but still seems perfectly cromulent as a means of communicating a similar understanding

          0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE endrift@social.treehouse.systems

            @0xabad1dea this is very different than I'm used to but still seems perfectly cromulent as a means of communicating a similar understanding

            0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
            0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
            0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @endrift western philosophy sure had a phase of being Weird about the revelation that languages don't need to particularly resemble Indo-European logic to power civilizations

            jhynjhiruu@toot.walesJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

              @endrift western philosophy sure had a phase of being Weird about the revelation that languages don't need to particularly resemble Indo-European logic to power civilizations

              jhynjhiruu@toot.walesJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jhynjhiruu@toot.walesJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jhynjhiruu@toot.wales
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @0xabad1dea @endrift there was also that whole "your indo-european language is worse than mine, obviously, so there's no *way* your civilisation had complex art before mine did"

              crzwdjk@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                Classical Chinese textbook example: 彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。

                me: there’s not a single concrete word in that entire sentence

                Next example: 是是非非

                me: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ this is why people keep trying to ban philosophy

                (The first is “that too is true or false; this too is true or false” and the second doesn’t translate in a way that captures the blunt reduplication of literally “this-is this-is is-not is-not” but roughly “finding true things to be true and false things to be false”)

                #classicalchinese #philosophy

                technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @0xabad1dea curious what your take is on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBhg2p8aAQ0

                0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jhynjhiruu@toot.walesJ jhynjhiruu@toot.wales

                  @0xabad1dea @endrift there was also that whole "your indo-european language is worse than mine, obviously, so there's no *way* your civilisation had complex art before mine did"

                  crzwdjk@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  crzwdjk@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  crzwdjk@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @Jhynjhiruu @0xabad1dea My favorite example of Indo-European languages like this is Farsi (clearly the language of an ancient and powerful civilization) and Tajik (very poor country best known for migrant workers) which are actually the same language.

                  endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • crzwdjk@mastodon.socialC crzwdjk@mastodon.social

                    @Jhynjhiruu @0xabad1dea My favorite example of Indo-European languages like this is Farsi (clearly the language of an ancient and powerful civilization) and Tajik (very poor country best known for migrant workers) which are actually the same language.

                    endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
                    endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
                    endrift@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @crzwdjk @Jhynjhiruu @0xabad1dea I had to look this up...I had no idea it was basically just a dialect of Farsi!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT technomancy@hey.hagelb.org

                      @0xabad1dea curious what your take is on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBhg2p8aAQ0

                      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @technomancy I just watched it, it's interesting, I don't really get into these specific grammatical analysis weeds but I should probably re-check it and/or hang on this guy's doorbell when I try to explain the grammar on my own website

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups