Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

#retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
retrocomputing
55 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @wollman

    Did you replace the system board at any point? As far as I know, the 5150 BIOS doesn't know how to boot from a hard drive.

    @fluidlogic

    wollman@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wollman@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wollman@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    @fluidlogic @argv_minus_one The controller had an option ROM.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

      @silvermoon82

      You could have upgraded it to a 486. Not a Pentium, though—Pentium motherboards were ATX and needed the case to provide a soft power button.

      As far as I know, nothing much changed after that, so you could put modern hardware in a Pentium-era case…although you might need to drill some extra vent holes in it and add some more fans!

      @fluidlogic

      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
      lackthereof@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      @argv_minus_one @silvermoon82

      No, lots of the early socket 5 pentium motherboards were plain-AT, it wasn't until the later ones, with socket 7 and SDRAM, that they started adopting ATX. Mostly because it meant they could get 3.3v directly from the psu instead of needing a regulator on the mobo.

      I had a gateway 2000 100mhz pentium with a big clonky power button and big hot 3.3v regulators on the motherboard.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

        @quinn it's more of a mix than I expected!

        (I had guessed just 10% of retrocomputing folk didn't, when they were first released, have access to the machines that are currently their retrocomputers of choice. The poll indicates right now it's over 20%, which I find encouraging, as it indicates there's a sizeable chunk for whom retrocomputing is not about nostalgia primarily.)

        geraldew@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
        geraldew@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
        geraldew@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        @fluidlogic @quinn maybe more of a mix than you might guess.

        I'm not active in any "retro" sense, but I did work for an 8-bit maker in the 1980s - as well as having the same gear personally.

        Which means I don't have a rosy nostalgia and instead remember how flaky the hardware was, how scant the documentation was, how few were our ways to get answers - etc.

        But what I am grateful for in retrospect, is how understandable those systems were. So much of what I learned then, still guides me.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

          #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

          This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

          Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

          32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

          revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
          revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
          revk@toot.me.uk
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          @fluidlogic I could only dream of 16 bit processors 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

            @fluidlogic I worked on PDP 11s from the mid 70s to 1981 then onto Vax gear. So 16bits then 32 bits. It meant I got into 32 bits early and I wasn't interested in the PC machines. I did dabble in Windows towards the end of the 80s because a client wanted it and... only 16 bits? Are you kidding me?

            fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
            fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
            fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

            You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

            rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

              @fluidlogic

              I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

              The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

              fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
              fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
              fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              @argv_minus_one yes, they overlapped. In 1992, Atari released the Falcon and Commodore released the Amiga 4000.

              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wotsac@mastodon.socialW wotsac@mastodon.social

                @fluidlogic there's a lot of room to carve this up. Like CP/M was mostly before my time but I got pretty into those machines when they were at once relatively almost new, but also very obsolete- and I'd argue that was retrocomputing. Similar for the TRS/80 model 2/16/6000 which could also run XENIX and verged on being minis.

                fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                wrote last edited by
                #47

                @wotsac yes "heyday" is shorthand for "the time during which a machine felt new and exciting and was productive".

                This is not remotely a scientific poll! I have no idea if people who are answering are really current retrocomputing aficionados, for example.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                  @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

                  You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

                  rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #48

                  @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

                  fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

                    @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

                    fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                    wrote last edited by
                    #49

                    @rogerparkinson did you consider them mere toys at the time?

                    rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                      @fluidlogic

                      I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

                      The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lackthereof@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #50

                      @argv_minus_one

                      You could definitely buy major name consumer grade 286 desktop PCs in 1990.

                      My dad replaced our family's z80-based Heathkit with a 286-based Packard Bell on or around that year.

                      A lot of people just didn't use Windows back then, and the extra cost of a 386 had little advantage if you weren't doing gui+multitasking.

                      It wasn't the 386 that ushered in the end of 16 bit computing, it was windows 3.1... which could run on a 286 but was painfully restricted there.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #51

                        @AdrianRiskin yes! Put the word out on here, using the tags #retrocomputing , #vintagecomputing , #commodorepet and optionally #losangeles and you'll get people popping up offering to take it off your hands. If you can include a snap or two, so much the better. Good luck!

                        I suggest not putting power into it, as the chemistry-based electronics will have degraded in storage and might pop, making repair harder.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #52

                          @scuttlebutt thanks - I wasn't aware.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                            @argv_minus_one yes, they overlapped. In 1992, Atari released the Falcon and Commodore released the Amiga 4000.

                            argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                            argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                            argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                            wrote last edited by
                            #53

                            @fluidlogic

                            Hmm? I don't understand. Those are both 32-bit machines.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                              @rogerparkinson did you consider them mere toys at the time?

                              rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #54

                              @fluidlogic I can't say I thought about them much, other than the idea of taking a machine home rather than using it at the office. I got a PC and I mainly used it to dial into the VAX machines at work. I never gave the others (ie 8 bits) a thought. Then I had to do some programming on, by then, Windows 3. Had to jump through lots of hoops to do what I wanted in 16 bits.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                                #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

                                This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

                                Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

                                32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

                                hunterking@heads.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hunterking@heads.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hunterking@heads.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #55

                                @fluidlogic First computer was a 386 SX. When Doom came around I was still having a blast at like 8fps.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups