Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

#retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
retrocomputing
55 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

    @fluidlogic I worked on PDP 11s from the mid 70s to 1981 then onto Vax gear. So 16bits then 32 bits. It meant I got into 32 bits early and I wasn't interested in the PC machines. I did dabble in Windows towards the end of the 80s because a client wanted it and... only 16 bits? Are you kidding me?

    fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
    fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
    fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
    wrote last edited by
    #45

    @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

    You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

    rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

      @fluidlogic

      I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

      The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

      fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
      fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
      fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
      wrote last edited by
      #46

      @argv_minus_one yes, they overlapped. In 1992, Atari released the Falcon and Commodore released the Amiga 4000.

      argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wotsac@mastodon.socialW wotsac@mastodon.social

        @fluidlogic there's a lot of room to carve this up. Like CP/M was mostly before my time but I got pretty into those machines when they were at once relatively almost new, but also very obsolete- and I'd argue that was retrocomputing. Similar for the TRS/80 model 2/16/6000 which could also run XENIX and verged on being minis.

        fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
        fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
        fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
        wrote last edited by
        #47

        @wotsac yes "heyday" is shorthand for "the time during which a machine felt new and exciting and was productive".

        This is not remotely a scientific poll! I have no idea if people who are answering are really current retrocomputing aficionados, for example.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

          @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

          You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

          rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
          rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
          rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
          wrote last edited by
          #48

          @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

          fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

            @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

            fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
            fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
            fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
            wrote last edited by
            #49

            @rogerparkinson did you consider them mere toys at the time?

            rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

              @fluidlogic

              I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

              The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

              lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
              lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
              lackthereof@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #50

              @argv_minus_one

              You could definitely buy major name consumer grade 286 desktop PCs in 1990.

              My dad replaced our family's z80-based Heathkit with a 286-based Packard Bell on or around that year.

              A lot of people just didn't use Windows back then, and the extra cost of a 386 had little advantage if you weren't doing gui+multitasking.

              It wasn't the 386 that ushered in the end of 16 bit computing, it was windows 3.1... which could run on a 286 but was painfully restricted there.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                wrote last edited by
                #51

                @AdrianRiskin yes! Put the word out on here, using the tags #retrocomputing , #vintagecomputing , #commodorepet and optionally #losangeles and you'll get people popping up offering to take it off your hands. If you can include a snap or two, so much the better. Good luck!

                I suggest not putting power into it, as the chemistry-based electronics will have degraded in storage and might pop, making repair harder.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #52

                  @scuttlebutt thanks - I wasn't aware.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                    @argv_minus_one yes, they overlapped. In 1992, Atari released the Falcon and Commodore released the Amiga 4000.

                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #53

                    @fluidlogic

                    Hmm? I don't understand. Those are both 32-bit machines.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                      @rogerparkinson did you consider them mere toys at the time?

                      rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #54

                      @fluidlogic I can't say I thought about them much, other than the idea of taking a machine home rather than using it at the office. I got a PC and I mainly used it to dial into the VAX machines at work. I never gave the others (ie 8 bits) a thought. Then I had to do some programming on, by then, Windows 3. Had to jump through lots of hoops to do what I wanted in 16 bits.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                        #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

                        This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

                        Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

                        32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

                        hunterking@heads.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hunterking@heads.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hunterking@heads.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #55

                        @fluidlogic First computer was a 386 SX. When Doom came around I was still having a blast at like 8fps.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups