Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
34 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
    wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
    wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

    US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

    FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

    California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

    FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

    wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW madewokherd@computerfairi.esM dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN sidawson@mas.toS 14 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

      RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

      US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

      FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

      California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

      FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

      wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
      wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
      wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

      aslakr@mastodon.socialA sidawson@mas.toS dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD primo@donphan.socialP monokeros@tech.lgbtM 7 Replies Last reply
      0
      • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

        RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

        US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

        FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

        California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

        FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

        madewokherd@computerfairi.esM This user is from outside of this forum
        madewokherd@computerfairi.esM This user is from outside of this forum
        madewokherd@computerfairi.es
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @wwahammy To me, age verification means someone actually checks. AFAICT this leaves it entirely up to whoever configures/admins the device. Which still sucks, but I feel like this puts it more on par with the thing where websites ask for your birthdate and all it does is teach kids to lie about their birthdates.

        Strategically, I'm not sure where I should fall on this, because while it's just as ineffective and misguided, it avoids some of the worst harms and might displace more harmful laws.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

          RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

          US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

          FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

          California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

          FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

          dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
          dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
          dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          They can pry my age data from my fucking corpse at this rate. I ain't giving it up for this shit. Fuck 'em.

          wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net

            They can pry my age data from my fucking corpse at this rate. I ain't giving it up for this shit. Fuck 'em.

            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @dogiedog64 I agree. But no Linux desktop user should ever be asked that and have it used against them to use Linux.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

              And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

              aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              aslakr@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @wwahammy There where books with source code https://www.amazon.com/PGP-Internals-Philip-R-Zimmermann/dp/0262240394 to circumvent export restrictions.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

                California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                n_dimension@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @wwahammy

                NAME AND SHAME
                These so called "#FOSS" developers

                silverwizard@convenient.emailS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                  And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                  sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sidawson@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @wwahammy That was the one tattoo I've seriously considered getting.

                  arakin@meow.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                    RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                    US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                    FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

                    California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                    FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                    sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sidawson@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @wwahammy This seems VERY suspicious, to me. (see, eg those doge asshole kids)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                      RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                      US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                      FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

                      California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                      FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                      r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      r0k@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @wwahammy I still don't understand how the flawed assumptions are supposed to be handled. And they're basic. What age is a web server OS install going to enter when they have no direct human user, just system accounts? What age is expected to be entered for multi-user systems, especially when users have differing ages? None of this makes sense.

                      wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • r0k@mastodon.socialR r0k@mastodon.social

                        @wwahammy I still don't understand how the flawed assumptions are supposed to be handled. And they're basic. What age is a web server OS install going to enter when they have no direct human user, just system accounts? What age is expected to be entered for multi-user systems, especially when users have differing ages? None of this makes sense.

                        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @r0k the dipshit governor brought some of this up when he signed the bill. No one has a fucking clue, it it will have to be amended which everything I've heard is that it will be. And there's still going to be many lawsuits.

                        r0k@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                          @r0k the dipshit governor brought some of this up when he signed the bill. No one has a fucking clue, it it will have to be amended which everything I've heard is that it will be. And there's still going to be many lawsuits.

                          r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          r0k@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @wwahammy yeah, I don't understand the concept of signing a bill into law while saying it needs to be amended before the law goes into effect. That's the kind of thing you do while it's a bill before it turns into law. They're all inept and Meta is pulling the strings.

                          Link Preview Image

                          favicon

                          (www.reddit.com)

                          wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • r0k@mastodon.socialR r0k@mastodon.social

                            @wwahammy yeah, I don't understand the concept of signing a bill into law while saying it needs to be amended before the law goes into effect. That's the kind of thing you do while it's a bill before it turns into law. They're all inept and Meta is pulling the strings.

                            Link Preview Image

                            favicon

                            (www.reddit.com)

                            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @r0k in the totally craven sense, the law passed unanimously so there's no gain for him to veto the law and get attacked for "not protecting the kids!" if it's just going to go into effect anyways.

                            I don't agree with his decision but that's probably why.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                              And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @wwahammy the old encryption export controls are exactly what this age verification stuff made me think of too

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sidawson@mas.toS sidawson@mas.to

                                @wwahammy That was the one tattoo I've seriously considered getting.

                                arakin@meow.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                arakin@meow.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                arakin@meow.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @sidawson @wwahammy my Canadian University's Computer Club had t-shirts made πŸ˜…

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                  RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                                  US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                                  FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

                                  California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                                  FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kangaroo@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @wwahammy ffffuck no to this

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                    RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                                    US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                                    FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

                                    California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                                    FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                                    revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    revk@toot.me.uk
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @wwahammy I still want to know what age one should put for β€œroot”?

                                    wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                      RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                                      US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                                      FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise πŸ˜‰

                                      California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                                      FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                                      pointlessone@status.pointless.oneP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pointlessone@status.pointless.oneP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pointlessone@status.pointless.one
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @wwahammy are any of the devs even in California?

                                      I remember illegal numbers (it was not that long ago actually) when people went out of their way to meme in the face of law.

                                      bweller@mstdn.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                        And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                                        primo@donphan.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        primo@donphan.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        primo@donphan.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @wwahammy wait, like actual war material?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN n_dimension@infosec.exchange

                                          @wwahammy

                                          NAME AND SHAME
                                          These so called "#FOSS" developers

                                          silverwizard@convenient.emailS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          silverwizard@convenient.emailS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          silverwizard@convenient.email
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20
                                          @n_dimension @wwahammy github.com/systemd/systemd/pul… it's really bad
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups