Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
34 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

    And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

    sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
    sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
    sidawson@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @wwahammy That was the one tattoo I've seriously considered getting.

    arakin@meow.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

      RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

      US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

      FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise 😉

      California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

      FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

      sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
      sidawson@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
      sidawson@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @wwahammy This seems VERY suspicious, to me. (see, eg those doge asshole kids)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

        RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

        US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

        FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise 😉

        California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

        FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

        r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        r0k@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @wwahammy I still don't understand how the flawed assumptions are supposed to be handled. And they're basic. What age is a web server OS install going to enter when they have no direct human user, just system accounts? What age is expected to be entered for multi-user systems, especially when users have differing ages? None of this makes sense.

        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • r0k@mastodon.socialR r0k@mastodon.social

          @wwahammy I still don't understand how the flawed assumptions are supposed to be handled. And they're basic. What age is a web server OS install going to enter when they have no direct human user, just system accounts? What age is expected to be entered for multi-user systems, especially when users have differing ages? None of this makes sense.

          wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
          wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
          wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @r0k the dipshit governor brought some of this up when he signed the bill. No one has a fucking clue, it it will have to be amended which everything I've heard is that it will be. And there's still going to be many lawsuits.

          r0k@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

            @r0k the dipshit governor brought some of this up when he signed the bill. No one has a fucking clue, it it will have to be amended which everything I've heard is that it will be. And there's still going to be many lawsuits.

            r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            r0k@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            r0k@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @wwahammy yeah, I don't understand the concept of signing a bill into law while saying it needs to be amended before the law goes into effect. That's the kind of thing you do while it's a bill before it turns into law. They're all inept and Meta is pulling the strings.

            Link Preview Image

            favicon

            (www.reddit.com)

            wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • r0k@mastodon.socialR r0k@mastodon.social

              @wwahammy yeah, I don't understand the concept of signing a bill into law while saying it needs to be amended before the law goes into effect. That's the kind of thing you do while it's a bill before it turns into law. They're all inept and Meta is pulling the strings.

              Link Preview Image

              favicon

              (www.reddit.com)

              wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @r0k in the totally craven sense, the law passed unanimously so there's no gain for him to veto the law and get attacked for "not protecting the kids!" if it's just going to go into effect anyways.

              I don't agree with his decision but that's probably why.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @wwahammy the old encryption export controls are exactly what this age verification stuff made me think of too

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sidawson@mas.toS sidawson@mas.to

                  @wwahammy That was the one tattoo I've seriously considered getting.

                  arakin@meow.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  arakin@meow.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  arakin@meow.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @sidawson @wwahammy my Canadian University's Computer Club had t-shirts made 😅

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                    RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                    US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                    FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise 😉

                    California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                    FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    kangaroo@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @wwahammy ffffuck no to this

                    Link Preview Image
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                      RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                      US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                      FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise 😉

                      California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                      FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                      revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                      revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                      revk@toot.me.uk
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @wwahammy I still want to know what age one should put for “root”?

                      wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                        RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                        US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                        FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise 😉

                        California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                        FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                        pointlessone@status.pointless.oneP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pointlessone@status.pointless.oneP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pointlessone@status.pointless.one
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @wwahammy are any of the devs even in California?

                        I remember illegal numbers (it was not that long ago actually) when people went out of their way to meme in the face of law.

                        Link Preview Image
                        bweller@mstdn.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                          And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                          primo@donphan.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          primo@donphan.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          primo@donphan.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @wwahammy wait, like actual war material?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN n_dimension@infosec.exchange

                            @wwahammy

                            NAME AND SHAME
                            These so called "#FOSS" developers

                            silverwizard@convenient.emailS This user is from outside of this forum
                            silverwizard@convenient.emailS This user is from outside of this forum
                            silverwizard@convenient.email
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20
                            @n_dimension @wwahammy github.com/systemd/systemd/pul… it's really bad
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                              And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                              monokeros@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                              monokeros@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                              monokeros@tech.lgbt
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @wwahammy My signed copy of Applied Crypto agrees with you

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                                tilton@fursuits.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tilton@fursuits.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tilton@fursuits.online
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @wwahammy Yeah, I started my career in 1995 and this is accurate. We never used to be this obsequious.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                  RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593

                                  US government in 1996: strong encryption is a munition and you can go to prison for years if you export

                                  FOSS engineers: hey so only use this if you're in the US but we'll give instructions for how to do it otherwise 😉

                                  California in 2026: we're passing a law that allows the AG to sue OS providers in civil court if they don't implement age verification in order to restrict Apple, Google, Facebook and the worst companies in the world.

                                  FOSS Engineers: OMG THEY MIGHT COME AFTER OUR LINUX LAPTOP VENDORS WHO HAVE LIKE 3 TOTAL CUSTOMERS WE SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED AGE GATING YESTERDAY I PROMISE WE'RE NOT CHALLENGING YOUR AUTHORITY GOVERNOR NEWSOM

                                  imbl@social.treehouse.systemsI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  imbl@social.treehouse.systemsI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  imbl@social.treehouse.systems
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @wwahammy lots of "reasonable people" just following orders 🙄

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                    And to be clear, I'm old enough to remember when strong encryption was a munitions, I'm speaking about these actions from first hand and near-first hand knowledge

                                    philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.com
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @wwahammy When I started at Google in 2016 I had to sign a bunch of export control paperwork because I *might* be able to find some encryption algorithm somewhere in the VCS I guess.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pointlessone@status.pointless.oneP pointlessone@status.pointless.one

                                      @wwahammy are any of the devs even in California?

                                      I remember illegal numbers (it was not that long ago actually) when people went out of their way to meme in the face of law.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bweller@mstdn.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @pointlessone i get the impression these are corporate devs astroturfing

                                      and this highlights exactly why FOSS and capitalism are incompatible

                                      because there is no Freedom under capitalism

                                      @wwahammy

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • revk@toot.me.ukR revk@toot.me.uk

                                        @wwahammy I still want to know what age one should put for “root”?

                                        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @revk that is a good point, there's no exemption for root.

                                        revk@toot.me.ukR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                                          @revk that is a good point, there's no exemption for root.

                                          revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          revk@toot.me.uk
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @wwahammy 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC

                                          wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups