Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I am colourblind.

I am colourblind.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
22 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fesshole@mastodon.socialF fesshole@mastodon.social

    I am colourblind. I have completely rejected academic manuscripts and proposals that use only red and green in graphs without shape or line width differences. If they are that incompetent about use of colour, they are not going to be better in other things.

    tillmanreuter@ecoevo.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tillmanreuter@ecoevo.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tillmanreuter@ecoevo.social
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @fesshole I think you are wrong in your final conclusion

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fesshole@mastodon.socialF fesshole@mastodon.social

      I am colourblind. I have completely rejected academic manuscripts and proposals that use only red and green in graphs without shape or line width differences. If they are that incompetent about use of colour, they are not going to be better in other things.

      faithpearl@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      faithpearl@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      faithpearl@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @fesshole But you're color blind 😅

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fesshole@mastodon.socialF fesshole@mastodon.social

        I am colourblind. I have completely rejected academic manuscripts and proposals that use only red and green in graphs without shape or line width differences. If they are that incompetent about use of colour, they are not going to be better in other things.

        iainbertram@mastodon.auI This user is from outside of this forum
        iainbertram@mastodon.auI This user is from outside of this forum
        iainbertram@mastodon.au
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @fesshole if you are reviewing you shouldn’t have to. The editors should have this fixed before review

        cadadr@polyglot.cityC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mellivora@im-in.spaceM mellivora@im-in.space

          @Mabande@mastodon.social they're using their disability as an excuse to be a power tripping dickhead. I would've reported them and people like you making excuses for these sort of people are part of the problem. @fesshole

          negative12dollarbill@techhub.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          negative12dollarbill@techhub.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          negative12dollarbill@techhub.social
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @Mellivora @fesshole All graphing software would have the lines distinguished by other things: dots and dashes, added squares or circles.

          mellivora@im-in.spaceM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • negative12dollarbill@techhub.socialN negative12dollarbill@techhub.social

            @Mellivora @fesshole All graphing software would have the lines distinguished by other things: dots and dashes, added squares or circles.

            mellivora@im-in.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
            mellivora@im-in.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
            mellivora@im-in.space
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @negative12dollarbill that still doesn't excuse a dickhead using his disability as an excuse to be a powertripping asshat. Just rubs off as someone who is insufferable to work with. @fesshole

            cppguy@infosec.spaceC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fesshole@mastodon.socialF fesshole@mastodon.social

              I am colourblind. I have completely rejected academic manuscripts and proposals that use only red and green in graphs without shape or line width differences. If they are that incompetent about use of colour, they are not going to be better in other things.

              grumpydad@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
              grumpydad@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
              grumpydad@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @fesshole Did you give them that as feedback? 'Cause if you didn't it was a dick move.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mellivora@im-in.spaceM mellivora@im-in.space

                @negative12dollarbill that still doesn't excuse a dickhead using his disability as an excuse to be a powertripping asshat. Just rubs off as someone who is insufferable to work with. @fesshole

                cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                cppguy@infosec.space
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @Mellivora @negative12dollarbill @fesshole

                About one man in twelve has some form of colourblindness:

                Just a moment...

                favicon

                (www.colourblindawareness.org)

                If Fessor can't make sense of the graphs in the paper then a good many men (and a smaller number of women) will have the same problem. As long as Fessor explains the reason for rejecting the paper, I think it's valid.

                celesteh@post.lurk.orgC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fesshole@mastodon.socialF fesshole@mastodon.social

                  I am colourblind. I have completely rejected academic manuscripts and proposals that use only red and green in graphs without shape or line width differences. If they are that incompetent about use of colour, they are not going to be better in other things.

                  tryst@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tryst@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tryst@meow.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @fesshole I'm a company editor and I've rejected reports and presentations for the same reason. Accessibility is important!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • iainbertram@mastodon.auI iainbertram@mastodon.au

                    @fesshole if you are reviewing you shouldn’t have to. The editors should have this fixed before review

                    cadadr@polyglot.cityC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cadadr@polyglot.cityC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cadadr@polyglot.city
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @iainbertram @fesshole academic publishers are worse at editing than children's books publishing houses, it's extremely outrageous

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cppguy@infosec.spaceC cppguy@infosec.space

                      @Mellivora @negative12dollarbill @fesshole

                      About one man in twelve has some form of colourblindness:

                      Just a moment...

                      favicon

                      (www.colourblindawareness.org)

                      If Fessor can't make sense of the graphs in the paper then a good many men (and a smaller number of women) will have the same problem. As long as Fessor explains the reason for rejecting the paper, I think it's valid.

                      celesteh@post.lurk.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                      celesteh@post.lurk.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                      celesteh@post.lurk.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @CppGuy @Mellivora @negative12dollarbill @fesshole

                      The normal way for dealing with this level of error is to ask the author to fix it. That kind of feedback would be extremely valuable for people like early career researchers or people who have not been taught to consider accessibility.

                      I hope the OP does at least include this feedback in the rejection, but since its not usually considered a major fuckup, I fear this will get lost amoung whatever more serious error is given as a pretext. Indeed, if that error is not really a problem of would undermine the rest of the feedback.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups