Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Coal produces about 33% of global electricitySolar and wind produce 8–9% eachElectricity meets about 20% of total energy demandhttps://www.visualcapitalist.com/coal-still-powers-more-electricity/

Coal produces about 33% of global electricitySolar and wind produce 8–9% eachElectricity meets about 20% of total energy demandhttps://www.visualcapitalist.com/coal-still-powers-more-electricity/

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
108 Posts 11 Posters 29 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quinn@social.circl.luQ quinn@social.circl.lu

    @dnkboston @knud @gerrymcgovern we could start by closing the hospitals at the weekends, so we could save energy and kill off the unproductive at the same time! Look, I'm all for blowing up the AI business, etc, but blanket use less energy comes with real costs. Life was not very fun, or long, before electrification.

    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
    wrote last edited by
    #81

    @quinn
    We ca either have managed degrowth or forced degrowth. Forced degrowth is going to much, much more horrible. Some believe our population will drop to 1 billion or even 100 million. We have so overshot and done so much damage to all the key pillars of life.

    @dnkboston @knud

    quinn@social.circl.luQ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT tschenkel@mathstodon.xyz

      @knud @gerrymcgovern @dnkboston

      My point is that scope 3 emissions don't include all the emissions that I think should be included. The way we calculate footprint is biased in favour of the global north.

      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
      wrote last edited by
      #82

      @tschenkel
      As has always been the case. What truly struck me as I researched for my last book was how deeply manipulative and manipulated the science was. How most scientists work in the service of government and industry and will say whatever needs to be said to justify continued economic growth and environmental exploitation.

      @knud @dnkboston

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

        @quinn
        We ca either have managed degrowth or forced degrowth. Forced degrowth is going to much, much more horrible. Some believe our population will drop to 1 billion or even 100 million. We have so overshot and done so much damage to all the key pillars of life.

        @dnkboston @knud

        quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quinn@social.circl.lu
        wrote last edited by
        #83

        @gerrymcgovern @dnkboston @knud more than 10,000 times the energy we need falls on the earth every day. Even more energy is available if we dig a hole and literally just drop a liquid in it. Yes there are more problems than energy availability, but we're starting to turn the corner on many of those too. And we're heading for natural population drop so fast that it's a big problem on its own. Look I get hating all humans, I was doing it before it was cool, but renewables are real, here, and good.

        quinn@social.circl.luQ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • quinn@social.circl.luQ quinn@social.circl.lu

          @gerrymcgovern @dnkboston @knud more than 10,000 times the energy we need falls on the earth every day. Even more energy is available if we dig a hole and literally just drop a liquid in it. Yes there are more problems than energy availability, but we're starting to turn the corner on many of those too. And we're heading for natural population drop so fast that it's a big problem on its own. Look I get hating all humans, I was doing it before it was cool, but renewables are real, here, and good.

          quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quinn@social.circl.lu
          wrote last edited by
          #84

          @gerrymcgovern @dnkboston @knud as for some people believe, hell some people believe the moon is made of cheese. Most of the rest of the non American world is moving forward into sustainable transition away from fossil fuels, and there's a global fertility crisis anyway. No one is having kids outside of Africa. (But I tell ya, when I say the future is African I have to hide in a bomb shelter for a week.) Renewables are real, and good, and happening in most of the world

          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nyc@discuss.systemsN nyc@discuss.systems

            @dnkboston @knud @gerrymcgovern Jean-Baptiste Fressoz «Sans transition: une nouvelle histoire de l'énergie» thoroughly documents how historically, energy transitions have been primarily additive as opposed to replacing legacy energy resources, although to some extent new energy resources are used to enhance the extraction of legacy energy resources.

            dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dnkboston@apobangpo.space
            wrote last edited by
            #85

            @nyc I loved that book. "He came with receipts" doesn't do him justice--but he did. @knud @gerrymcgovern

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ jonesmurphy@mastodon.social

              @dnkboston the Vietnam War was extremely popular among white people for years. It wasn't until the US was clearly losing in 1968 under LBJ that the war became unpopular. Even then, Nixon was extremely popular in the early 70s among white voters for prolonging the war and bombing Cambodia. Nixon won the biggest electoral college victory ever in 1972 for this.

              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
              dnkboston@apobangpo.space
              wrote last edited by
              #86

              @jonesmurphy "Bread and circus" perfected--now you can do it far away.

              jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • knud@mastodon.socialK knud@mastodon.social

                @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern

                I have literally no idea what you are talking about.

                The only alternative to producing energy via solar and wind is fossil. Do you want that?

                dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                wrote last edited by
                #87

                @knud The fact that you don't understand makes this conversation difficult. You can read @gerrymcgovern 's book. Or Fressoz or Zehner. Or the archives at Cultural Survival.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • knud@mastodon.socialK knud@mastodon.social

                  @nyc @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern

                  Germany is phasing out coal while having phased out nuclear, and while reducing primary energy use. All this driven towards lower carbon intensity of energy by a strong push to renewables:

                  https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/system/files/medien/384/bilder/2_abb_primaerenergieverbrauch_2025-12-18.png

                  So the "historic" perspective doesn't extrapolate to the present, bc ending the 500,000 year epoch of burning stuff is fundamentally new.

                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #88

                  @knud Is this still with the accounting that includes Germany using "biomass"? @nyc @gerrymcgovern

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                    @jonesmurphy "Bread and circus" perfected--now you can do it far away.

                    jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jonesmurphy@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #89

                    @dnkboston LBJ faced fierce opposition from Goldwater Republicans and right wing Democrats for insufficient warfare in Vietnam. Nixon gave them enormous warfare all over the world as well as nuclear proliferation to apartheid South Africa and Israel. Nixon called the War on Poverty "a new tyranny ". White supremacists agreed.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ jonesmurphy@mastodon.social

                      @gerrymcgovern @knud @dnkboston this is bullshit. There are numerous other forms of renewable energy besides solar. The principal obstacle to them is not China. It's your Nazi relatives, friends, neighbors and tribesme. You're bashing China which is a far lower emitter per capita than Europe and its evil Diaspora. You are racist as hell. Western conservatives are the worst people in the world on this and many other topics.

                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #90

                      @jonesmurphy That's not true. @gerrymcgovern is not racist. In fact, his thesis concerns how racist, white, toxic masculinity leads to the extractive capitalism that's killing all of us. @knud

                      jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

                        @knud nevertheless, I don’t think we are strategically in control of what we’re doing and the incentives pretty much ensure that we are not capable of becoming so.

                        Oil and gas will become radically less affordable in the coming years and the lived experience of being on the enforced downslope of power consumption will help us forge new ways of being

                        @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern

                        dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #91

                        @urlyman Maybe. But from what I've seen, normal price signals aren't enough. @knud @gerrymcgovern

                        urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                          @jonesmurphy That's not true. @gerrymcgovern is not racist. In fact, his thesis concerns how racist, white, toxic masculinity leads to the extractive capitalism that's killing all of us. @knud

                          jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jonesmurphy@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #92

                          @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern @knud I'm not threatened by capitalism. I'm threatened by racism, something much bigger and older. There's a lot of racism in Communist countries that isn't produced by capitalism at all. The most capitalist parts of the USA are the most sensible environmentally. Suicidal stupidity on the environment is maximal in the least capitalist parts of the country, starting with the Confederate South and allied areas.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                            @urlyman Maybe. But from what I've seen, normal price signals aren't enough. @knud @gerrymcgovern

                            urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                            urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                            urlyman@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #93

                            @dnkboston hence my use of the word “enforced”. The lived experience of relative absence will drive change. And perhaps, out of a deficit of technological ubiquity will come a reconnection with forms of abundance that have always been there and still are, just

                            @knud @gerrymcgovern

                            dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                              @knud
                              There is no such thing as 100% recycling. The true recycling rate for modern electronics is probably about 5%, and every year electronics become less and less recyclable.

                              You always hear about sodium batteries replacing lithium--always a solution just around the corner. Meanwhile, in the USA alone 100 new lithium mines are planned.

                              @dnkboston

                              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #94

                              @gerrymcgovern I rolled my eyes when I saw that a few weeks ago. But I remember also reading that they were rejected as a nuclear reactor solution because sodium is so unstable (*Nuclear Is Not The Solution*, Ramana). That's really not a concern for batteries? @knud

                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                                @gerrymcgovern I rolled my eyes when I saw that a few weeks ago. But I remember also reading that they were rejected as a nuclear reactor solution because sodium is so unstable (*Nuclear Is Not The Solution*, Ramana). That's really not a concern for batteries? @knud

                                gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                                wrote last edited by
                                #95

                                @dnkboston
                                And it's not a little itonic that batteries are being sold as clean and green. You would struggle to think of anything more toxic, with long lasting damage, than batteries. But then, the tech optimists were AI long before AI; all full of hallucinations.
                                @knud

                                dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quinn@social.circl.luQ quinn@social.circl.lu

                                  @gerrymcgovern @dnkboston @knud as for some people believe, hell some people believe the moon is made of cheese. Most of the rest of the non American world is moving forward into sustainable transition away from fossil fuels, and there's a global fertility crisis anyway. No one is having kids outside of Africa. (But I tell ya, when I say the future is African I have to hide in a bomb shelter for a week.) Renewables are real, and good, and happening in most of the world

                                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #96

                                  @quinn The future is African, and it's about damn time.

                                  We do get a lot of sun, but photovoltaic tech currently depends on elements that require devastating extraction. People seem unimpressed when I point out damage to ecosystems or human health, but hopefully they will be paused by how often these wastes can be radioactive.

                                  Many people in native nations lived long lives without electricity. The big things seemed to be 1) clean surroundings and 2) adequate food.

                                  @gerrymcgovern @knud

                                  quinn@social.circl.luQ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

                                    @dnkboston hence my use of the word “enforced”. The lived experience of relative absence will drive change. And perhaps, out of a deficit of technological ubiquity will come a reconnection with forms of abundance that have always been there and still are, just

                                    @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #97

                                    @urlyman Policy=enforcement? @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                    urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                                      @dnkboston
                                      And it's not a little itonic that batteries are being sold as clean and green. You would struggle to think of anything more toxic, with long lasting damage, than batteries. But then, the tech optimists were AI long before AI; all full of hallucinations.
                                      @knud

                                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #98

                                      @gerrymcgovern I admit, when I read the critique of batteries in Zehner's book a decade ago, something in me broke. We've been told they are the solution for so long. @knud

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                                        @quinn The future is African, and it's about damn time.

                                        We do get a lot of sun, but photovoltaic tech currently depends on elements that require devastating extraction. People seem unimpressed when I point out damage to ecosystems or human health, but hopefully they will be paused by how often these wastes can be radioactive.

                                        Many people in native nations lived long lives without electricity. The big things seemed to be 1) clean surroundings and 2) adequate food.

                                        @gerrymcgovern @knud

                                        quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        quinn@social.circl.lu
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #99

                                        @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern @knud the thing is we can recover and recycle these things, we even have the processes down, we just haven't.

                                        dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                                          @urlyman Policy=enforcement? @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                          urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                          urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                          urlyman@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #100

                                          @dnkboston no, that’s not where I’m coming from. Unavailability, intermittency.

                                          When oil becomes unprofitable it becomes less extracted. As it becomes less profitable the cost of capital heads sharply up. As do all of oil’s supply chain dependents, including metals, many of which are independently heading along similar trajectories https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/111374066310651684

                                          @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups