Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Coal produces about 33% of global electricitySolar and wind produce 8–9% eachElectricity meets about 20% of total energy demandhttps://www.visualcapitalist.com/coal-still-powers-more-electricity/

Coal produces about 33% of global electricitySolar and wind produce 8–9% eachElectricity meets about 20% of total energy demandhttps://www.visualcapitalist.com/coal-still-powers-more-electricity/

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
108 Posts 11 Posters 29 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • knud@mastodon.socialK knud@mastodon.social

    @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern

    I have literally no idea what you are talking about.

    The only alternative to producing energy via solar and wind is fossil. Do you want that?

    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
    dnkboston@apobangpo.space
    wrote last edited by
    #87

    @knud The fact that you don't understand makes this conversation difficult. You can read @gerrymcgovern 's book. Or Fressoz or Zehner. Or the archives at Cultural Survival.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • knud@mastodon.socialK knud@mastodon.social

      @nyc @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern

      Germany is phasing out coal while having phased out nuclear, and while reducing primary energy use. All this driven towards lower carbon intensity of energy by a strong push to renewables:

      Link Preview Image

      So the "historic" perspective doesn't extrapolate to the present, bc ending the 500,000 year epoch of burning stuff is fundamentally new.

      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
      dnkboston@apobangpo.space
      wrote last edited by
      #88

      @knud Is this still with the accounting that includes Germany using "biomass"? @nyc @gerrymcgovern

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

        @jonesmurphy "Bread and circus" perfected--now you can do it far away.

        jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonesmurphy@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #89

        @dnkboston LBJ faced fierce opposition from Goldwater Republicans and right wing Democrats for insufficient warfare in Vietnam. Nixon gave them enormous warfare all over the world as well as nuclear proliferation to apartheid South Africa and Israel. Nixon called the War on Poverty "a new tyranny ". White supremacists agreed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ jonesmurphy@mastodon.social

          @gerrymcgovern @knud @dnkboston this is bullshit. There are numerous other forms of renewable energy besides solar. The principal obstacle to them is not China. It's your Nazi relatives, friends, neighbors and tribesme. You're bashing China which is a far lower emitter per capita than Europe and its evil Diaspora. You are racist as hell. Western conservatives are the worst people in the world on this and many other topics.

          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
          dnkboston@apobangpo.space
          wrote last edited by
          #90

          @jonesmurphy That's not true. @gerrymcgovern is not racist. In fact, his thesis concerns how racist, white, toxic masculinity leads to the extractive capitalism that's killing all of us. @knud

          jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

            @knud nevertheless, I don’t think we are strategically in control of what we’re doing and the incentives pretty much ensure that we are not capable of becoming so.

            Oil and gas will become radically less affordable in the coming years and the lived experience of being on the enforced downslope of power consumption will help us forge new ways of being

            @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern

            dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dnkboston@apobangpo.space
            wrote last edited by
            #91

            @urlyman Maybe. But from what I've seen, normal price signals aren't enough. @knud @gerrymcgovern

            urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

              @jonesmurphy That's not true. @gerrymcgovern is not racist. In fact, his thesis concerns how racist, white, toxic masculinity leads to the extractive capitalism that's killing all of us. @knud

              jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jonesmurphy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jonesmurphy@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #92

              @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern @knud I'm not threatened by capitalism. I'm threatened by racism, something much bigger and older. There's a lot of racism in Communist countries that isn't produced by capitalism at all. The most capitalist parts of the USA are the most sensible environmentally. Suicidal stupidity on the environment is maximal in the least capitalist parts of the country, starting with the Confederate South and allied areas.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                @urlyman Maybe. But from what I've seen, normal price signals aren't enough. @knud @gerrymcgovern

                urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                urlyman@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #93

                @dnkboston hence my use of the word “enforced”. The lived experience of relative absence will drive change. And perhaps, out of a deficit of technological ubiquity will come a reconnection with forms of abundance that have always been there and still are, just

                @knud @gerrymcgovern

                dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                  @knud
                  There is no such thing as 100% recycling. The true recycling rate for modern electronics is probably about 5%, and every year electronics become less and less recyclable.

                  You always hear about sodium batteries replacing lithium--always a solution just around the corner. Meanwhile, in the USA alone 100 new lithium mines are planned.

                  @dnkboston

                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #94

                  @gerrymcgovern I rolled my eyes when I saw that a few weeks ago. But I remember also reading that they were rejected as a nuclear reactor solution because sodium is so unstable (*Nuclear Is Not The Solution*, Ramana). That's really not a concern for batteries? @knud

                  gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                    @gerrymcgovern I rolled my eyes when I saw that a few weeks ago. But I remember also reading that they were rejected as a nuclear reactor solution because sodium is so unstable (*Nuclear Is Not The Solution*, Ramana). That's really not a concern for batteries? @knud

                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                    wrote last edited by
                    #95

                    @dnkboston
                    And it's not a little itonic that batteries are being sold as clean and green. You would struggle to think of anything more toxic, with long lasting damage, than batteries. But then, the tech optimists were AI long before AI; all full of hallucinations.
                    @knud

                    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • quinn@social.circl.luQ quinn@social.circl.lu

                      @gerrymcgovern @dnkboston @knud as for some people believe, hell some people believe the moon is made of cheese. Most of the rest of the non American world is moving forward into sustainable transition away from fossil fuels, and there's a global fertility crisis anyway. No one is having kids outside of Africa. (But I tell ya, when I say the future is African I have to hide in a bomb shelter for a week.) Renewables are real, and good, and happening in most of the world

                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #96

                      @quinn The future is African, and it's about damn time.

                      We do get a lot of sun, but photovoltaic tech currently depends on elements that require devastating extraction. People seem unimpressed when I point out damage to ecosystems or human health, but hopefully they will be paused by how often these wastes can be radioactive.

                      Many people in native nations lived long lives without electricity. The big things seemed to be 1) clean surroundings and 2) adequate food.

                      @gerrymcgovern @knud

                      quinn@social.circl.luQ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

                        @dnkboston hence my use of the word “enforced”. The lived experience of relative absence will drive change. And perhaps, out of a deficit of technological ubiquity will come a reconnection with forms of abundance that have always been there and still are, just

                        @knud @gerrymcgovern

                        dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #97

                        @urlyman Policy=enforcement? @knud @gerrymcgovern

                        urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                          @dnkboston
                          And it's not a little itonic that batteries are being sold as clean and green. You would struggle to think of anything more toxic, with long lasting damage, than batteries. But then, the tech optimists were AI long before AI; all full of hallucinations.
                          @knud

                          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #98

                          @gerrymcgovern I admit, when I read the critique of batteries in Zehner's book a decade ago, something in me broke. We've been told they are the solution for so long. @knud

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                            @quinn The future is African, and it's about damn time.

                            We do get a lot of sun, but photovoltaic tech currently depends on elements that require devastating extraction. People seem unimpressed when I point out damage to ecosystems or human health, but hopefully they will be paused by how often these wastes can be radioactive.

                            Many people in native nations lived long lives without electricity. The big things seemed to be 1) clean surroundings and 2) adequate food.

                            @gerrymcgovern @knud

                            quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            quinn@social.circl.luQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            quinn@social.circl.lu
                            wrote last edited by
                            #99

                            @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern @knud the thing is we can recover and recycle these things, we even have the processes down, we just haven't.

                            dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                              @urlyman Policy=enforcement? @knud @gerrymcgovern

                              urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                              urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                              urlyman@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #100

                              @dnkboston no, that’s not where I’m coming from. Unavailability, intermittency.

                              When oil becomes unprofitable it becomes less extracted. As it becomes less profitable the cost of capital heads sharply up. As do all of oil’s supply chain dependents, including metals, many of which are independently heading along similar trajectories https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/111374066310651684

                              @knud @gerrymcgovern

                              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • quinn@social.circl.luQ quinn@social.circl.lu

                                @dnkboston @gerrymcgovern @knud the thing is we can recover and recycle these things, we even have the processes down, we just haven't.

                                dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                                wrote last edited by
                                #101

                                @quinn Recover and recycle what?

                                I look at the Mississippi, and I want to cry. I hope it can be revived, but we'd have to stop actively polluting it so it could. Same for hundreds of other waterways.

                                The financial incentives to recycle electronics as well as components like solar panels are not there, so when it gets done, it's by poorer people in poorer countries. Reading about those "processes" makes me never want to buy anything again.

                                @gerrymcgovern @knud

                                gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG quinn@social.circl.luQ 2 Replies Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

                                  @dnkboston no, that’s not where I’m coming from. Unavailability, intermittency.

                                  When oil becomes unprofitable it becomes less extracted. As it becomes less profitable the cost of capital heads sharply up. As do all of oil’s supply chain dependents, including metals, many of which are independently heading along similar trajectories https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/111374066310651684

                                  @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #102

                                  @urlyman I keep thinking about something Charles Mann wrote a decade ago. There's never been Peak Oil, thanks to the determination of governments and oil companies to keep it flowing, which fostered "innovative" tech to do so.

                                  I don't think oil will become difficult enough to extract in my lifetime.

                                  @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                  gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                  • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                                    @urlyman I keep thinking about something Charles Mann wrote a decade ago. There's never been Peak Oil, thanks to the determination of governments and oil companies to keep it flowing, which fostered "innovative" tech to do so.

                                    I don't think oil will become difficult enough to extract in my lifetime.

                                    @knud @gerrymcgovern

                                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #103

                                    @dnkboston
                                    I've been listening to some talks on the subject and talking to some experts, and there are definite signs that we have peaked and that oil and gas will become more and more expensive, with all the implications that has for food, industry, etc.

                                    @urlyman @knud

                                    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                                      @dnkboston
                                      I've been listening to some talks on the subject and talking to some experts, and there are definite signs that we have peaked and that oil and gas will become more and more expensive, with all the implications that has for food, industry, etc.

                                      @urlyman @knud

                                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #104

                                      @gerrymcgovern Because of Hormuz? Or even without that? @urlyman @knud

                                      urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                                        @quinn Recover and recycle what?

                                        I look at the Mississippi, and I want to cry. I hope it can be revived, but we'd have to stop actively polluting it so it could. Same for hundreds of other waterways.

                                        The financial incentives to recycle electronics as well as components like solar panels are not there, so when it gets done, it's by poorer people in poorer countries. Reading about those "processes" makes me never want to buy anything again.

                                        @gerrymcgovern @knud

                                        gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #105

                                        @dnkboston
                                        E-waste "recycling" is such a monstrous, cynical con. Basically, the Global North dumping it in the Global South where it poisons life, air, water, soil.

                                        Every year, electronics become less recyclable, the economy becomes more linear and toxic to life. And yet the fantasy of e-waste recycling is marketed just like it has been by the plastics industry.

                                        @quinn @knud

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD dnkboston@apobangpo.space

                                          @gerrymcgovern Because of Hormuz? Or even without that? @urlyman @knud

                                          urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                          urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                          urlyman@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #106

                                          @dnkboston perhaps accelerated by (too hard to see) but for sure without it anyway.

                                          The energy return on investment (EROI) of a barrel of oil around 1940 was 1:100. i.e. You get 100 barrels out for every 1 you invest in extraction. Today, the global average is about 1:15. Joseph Tainter thinks that it becomes unsustainable at about 1:10 because of the upfront costs of exploration and field development.

                                          That said, the EROI variance is large. So…

                                          @gerrymcgovern @knud

                                          urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups