Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Gosh this was a (recent) first-hand lived experience.

Gosh this was a (recent) first-hand lived experience.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 16 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • iagox86@infosec.exchangeI iagox86@infosec.exchange

    @Viss @hrbrmstr

    I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

    Also

    The reckoning will not be subtle. The firms still doing the work properly will be in a position to charge for it. The firms that have hollowed themselves out will discover that what they hollowed out was the thing the client was paying for.

    And

    Misunderstanding and misuse of AI in the workplace is rampant. In many of the rooms I now find myself in, expertise has been asked to look the other way: to deliver faster, produce more, integrate the tools more deeply, get out of the way of the colleagues who are “getting things done”

    These are all painfully familiar to read these days

    viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
    viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
    viss@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @iagox86 @hrbrmstr the churn

    da_667@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

      @iagox86 @hrbrmstr the churn

      da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      da_667@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

      I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

      I was livid.

      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN rootwyrm@weird.autosR viss@mastodon.socialV dio9sys@haunted.computerD hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH 5 Replies Last reply
      1
      0
      • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

        @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

        I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

        I was livid.

        nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Someone on reddit was legit telling me (and others) that there's no reason to bother encrypting passwords in memory because "the keys are right next to them."

        I just...I don't know what to do in this world anymore.

        rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange

          @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Someone on reddit was legit telling me (and others) that there's no reason to bother encrypting passwords in memory because "the keys are right next to them."

          I just...I don't know what to do in this world anymore.

          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autos
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @NosirrahSec @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr flee into the woods to become that thing everyone tells stories about.

          viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

            @NosirrahSec @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr flee into the woods to become that thing everyone tells stories about.

            viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            viss@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @rootwyrm @NosirrahSec @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr working on it

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

              @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

              I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

              I was livid.

              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autos
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr after seeing the results of hiring one guy who was entirely reliant on LLMs, my policy is now one of "if my only choice is one of these people, then the only ethical course of action is to advise the company simply set the money on fire instead."
              I've been burned enough that I absolutely will not sign off on someone who is clearly that unqualified and uninterested. There is no possibility of ROI - especially when the only raise is by jumping employers.

              rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

                I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

                I was livid.

                viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                viss@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr in like 2018 when i wanted to go ceo mode and hire a replacement as the head of the redteam, i took in ~30-40 resumes, whittled than down to 10-12, ended up interviewing like 8 of them.

                hired zero people
                either people applied with grossly inadequate experience, or outright lied on their resume. i even caught one guy with fake offsec certs. he paid someone to take the tests for him.

                its horrible.

                viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                  @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr in like 2018 when i wanted to go ceo mode and hire a replacement as the head of the redteam, i took in ~30-40 resumes, whittled than down to 10-12, ended up interviewing like 8 of them.

                  hired zero people
                  either people applied with grossly inadequate experience, or outright lied on their resume. i even caught one guy with fake offsec certs. he paid someone to take the tests for him.

                  its horrible.

                  viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                  viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                  viss@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr the people who were already misrepresenting themselves and their skills, are now just empowered to be even worse using llms

                  nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN caseydunham@infosec.exchangeC 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                    @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

                    I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

                    I was livid.

                    dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dio9sys@haunted.computer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @da_667

                    @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr it's like when a guy puts "linux admin experience" on their resume but they really mean "installed kali in a vm once," but times 1000

                    viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dio9sys@haunted.computerD dio9sys@haunted.computer

                      @da_667

                      @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr it's like when a guy puts "linux admin experience" on their resume but they really mean "installed kali in a vm once," but times 1000

                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      viss@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr worse - they used docker to light up kali once, and now theyre a combination devops, full stack dev, senior redteamer

                      someone in a signal chatgroup im in posted a link to some new popularity site for infosec influencers/grifters, and i investigated. its hosted on vercel, and the llm text instructions to generate the site content are in the sourcecode.

                      people self-label as a job they think is cool, and its all just lies

                      dio9sys@haunted.computerD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                        @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr worse - they used docker to light up kali once, and now theyre a combination devops, full stack dev, senior redteamer

                        someone in a signal chatgroup im in posted a link to some new popularity site for infosec influencers/grifters, and i investigated. its hosted on vercel, and the llm text instructions to generate the site content are in the sourcecode.

                        people self-label as a job they think is cool, and its all just lies

                        dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dio9sys@haunted.computer
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @Viss

                        @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr vercel not beating the allegations of being the ai slop cdn

                        viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dio9sys@haunted.computerD dio9sys@haunted.computer

                          @Viss

                          @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr vercel not beating the allegations of being the ai slop cdn

                          viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                          viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                          viss@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr i wish i could show you all the shit i pulled on the last assessment gig I did - they had stuff hosted in vercel, and i was able to loot the vercel token out of github via loose code perms and abusing actions, then once looted, theres no way to fix it other than to re-roll the api key. and vercel has bupkis for controlling api keys compared to aws. i had to propose an entire architecture change for their ci/cd pipeline to fix it

                          iagox86@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                            @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr i wish i could show you all the shit i pulled on the last assessment gig I did - they had stuff hosted in vercel, and i was able to loot the vercel token out of github via loose code perms and abusing actions, then once looted, theres no way to fix it other than to re-roll the api key. and vercel has bupkis for controlling api keys compared to aws. i had to propose an entire architecture change for their ci/cd pipeline to fix it

                            iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                            iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                            iagox86@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr For no particular reason, I'm thinking of this line:

                            I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

                            Imagine doing a technical review and instead of reading feedback, they simply paste it into Claude. I'm not mentioning this for any particular reason of course

                            dio9sys@haunted.computerD s_wilson@mastodon.unoS 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • iagox86@infosec.exchangeI iagox86@infosec.exchange

                              @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr For no particular reason, I'm thinking of this line:

                              I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

                              Imagine doing a technical review and instead of reading feedback, they simply paste it into Claude. I'm not mentioning this for any particular reason of course

                              dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dio9sys@haunted.computer
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @iagox86

                              @Viss @da_667 @hrbrmstr it would really suck to be the person who has to do multiple rounds of that with a really fast turnaround time with someone who argues with every correction you suggest. If a job was like that then it would be really frustrating.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                                @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

                                I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

                                I was livid.

                                hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hotsoup@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Security is not an entry level position, probs a bit reductive, but at some point people do need to hire juniors. Everyone wants the unicorn. Ya'll. The people with years of experience, but for a bargain, the price of a junior. Nobody wants to be the one to glue a horn to a horse, they don't want to train a junior so they don't suck. Even if it's part of the job. This isn't unique to security. This is an epidemic of not hiring. Across multiple disciplines. An HR problem. At some point the would be juniors, fresh out of school, adapted and that meant fudging the resumes. Gotta put bread on the table somehow, those student loans aren't going to pay themselves and it's not like you can just go back to school. The system forced them to fake it till they make it, and so they're using the fake it till you make it machine. Break the cycle maybe?

                                viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH hotsoup@infosec.exchange

                                  @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Security is not an entry level position, probs a bit reductive, but at some point people do need to hire juniors. Everyone wants the unicorn. Ya'll. The people with years of experience, but for a bargain, the price of a junior. Nobody wants to be the one to glue a horn to a horse, they don't want to train a junior so they don't suck. Even if it's part of the job. This isn't unique to security. This is an epidemic of not hiring. Across multiple disciplines. An HR problem. At some point the would be juniors, fresh out of school, adapted and that meant fudging the resumes. Gotta put bread on the table somehow, those student loans aren't going to pay themselves and it's not like you can just go back to school. The system forced them to fake it till they make it, and so they're using the fake it till you make it machine. Break the cycle maybe?

                                  viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  viss@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @hotsoup @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr my postition has always been that people who are experts in other domains, move into security laterally and take their domain expertise with them.

                                  sysadmins and network folks make great redteamers because theyre intimately familiar with systems and networks ALREADY

                                  devs and devops make great analysts because they can take those skills and apply them to the coding surfaces of security

                                  iagox86@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • iagox86@infosec.exchangeI iagox86@infosec.exchange

                                    @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr For no particular reason, I'm thinking of this line:

                                    I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

                                    Imagine doing a technical review and instead of reading feedback, they simply paste it into Claude. I'm not mentioning this for any particular reason of course

                                    s_wilson@mastodon.unoS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    s_wilson@mastodon.unoS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    s_wilson@mastodon.uno
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @iagox86 @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr It reminds me of when I comment a pull request lately

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                                      @hotsoup @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr my postition has always been that people who are experts in other domains, move into security laterally and take their domain expertise with them.

                                      sysadmins and network folks make great redteamers because theyre intimately familiar with systems and networks ALREADY

                                      devs and devops make great analysts because they can take those skills and apply them to the coding surfaces of security

                                      iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iagox86@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      @Viss @hotsoup @da_667 @hrbrmstr to quote @jeffmcjunkin, "security is a prestige class"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                                        @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr the people who were already misrepresenting themselves and their skills, are now just empowered to be even worse using llms

                                        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @Viss @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Two thoughts from the academic side:

                                        1) Higher ed is absolutely all in on AI. While I think there are some novel use cases, it comes down to two things. First, at least in most computing disciplines, the vast majority of research funding (which tenure-track faculty are required to get) is tied to AI usage at the moment. Second, we're largely being told - by industry - that it's going to be all AI, all the time in the future.

                                        To quote Upton Sinclair, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it." AI is, at the moment, deeply embedded into two of the biggest revenue streams for universities.

                                        We desperately need external people - ideally people tied to revenue streams - talking to Deans and Chairs about the problems associated with AI. The filter bubble is real.

                                        2) On the student side... the root problem here is that the tech industry has lost it's veneer of being an ideal (maybe even good) place to work. I broadly see less intrinsic motivation. I would cautiously say that working in tech now is perceived similarly to working in business/banking 15 years ago. Decreasing intrinsic motivation is very likely tied to students trying to find the quickest/easiest way through.

                                        viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange

                                          @Viss @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Two thoughts from the academic side:

                                          1) Higher ed is absolutely all in on AI. While I think there are some novel use cases, it comes down to two things. First, at least in most computing disciplines, the vast majority of research funding (which tenure-track faculty are required to get) is tied to AI usage at the moment. Second, we're largely being told - by industry - that it's going to be all AI, all the time in the future.

                                          To quote Upton Sinclair, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it." AI is, at the moment, deeply embedded into two of the biggest revenue streams for universities.

                                          We desperately need external people - ideally people tied to revenue streams - talking to Deans and Chairs about the problems associated with AI. The filter bubble is real.

                                          2) On the student side... the root problem here is that the tech industry has lost it's veneer of being an ideal (maybe even good) place to work. I broadly see less intrinsic motivation. I would cautiously say that working in tech now is perceived similarly to working in business/banking 15 years ago. Decreasing intrinsic motivation is very likely tied to students trying to find the quickest/easiest way through.

                                          viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          viss@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #25

                                          @nerdpr0f @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr ive been cultivating this 'claude is your insider threat now' talk for months, and next week im servicing a customer with a tailored version of that talk, plus an llm workshop for how to use this stuff without rm'ing yourself or getting owned. i estimate this will become a template that other customers can purchase. so .. im not only working on it, i'll have an offering in a week to publish.

                                          nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups