Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Gosh this was a (recent) first-hand lived experience.

Gosh this was a (recent) first-hand lived experience.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 16 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

    @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

    I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

    I was livid.

    nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Someone on reddit was legit telling me (and others) that there's no reason to bother encrypting passwords in memory because "the keys are right next to them."

    I just...I don't know what to do in this world anymore.

    rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange

      @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Someone on reddit was legit telling me (and others) that there's no reason to bother encrypting passwords in memory because "the keys are right next to them."

      I just...I don't know what to do in this world anymore.

      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autos
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @NosirrahSec @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr flee into the woods to become that thing everyone tells stories about.

      viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

        @NosirrahSec @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr flee into the woods to become that thing everyone tells stories about.

        viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        viss@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @rootwyrm @NosirrahSec @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr working on it

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

          @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

          I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

          I was livid.

          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autos
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr after seeing the results of hiring one guy who was entirely reliant on LLMs, my policy is now one of "if my only choice is one of these people, then the only ethical course of action is to advise the company simply set the money on fire instead."
          I've been burned enough that I absolutely will not sign off on someone who is clearly that unqualified and uninterested. There is no possibility of ROI - especially when the only raise is by jumping employers.

          rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

            @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

            I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

            I was livid.

            viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            viss@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr in like 2018 when i wanted to go ceo mode and hire a replacement as the head of the redteam, i took in ~30-40 resumes, whittled than down to 10-12, ended up interviewing like 8 of them.

            hired zero people
            either people applied with grossly inadequate experience, or outright lied on their resume. i even caught one guy with fake offsec certs. he paid someone to take the tests for him.

            its horrible.

            viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

              @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr in like 2018 when i wanted to go ceo mode and hire a replacement as the head of the redteam, i took in ~30-40 resumes, whittled than down to 10-12, ended up interviewing like 8 of them.

              hired zero people
              either people applied with grossly inadequate experience, or outright lied on their resume. i even caught one guy with fake offsec certs. he paid someone to take the tests for him.

              its horrible.

              viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
              viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
              viss@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr the people who were already misrepresenting themselves and their skills, are now just empowered to be even worse using llms

              nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN caseydunham@infosec.exchangeC 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

                I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

                I was livid.

                dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                dio9sys@haunted.computer
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @da_667

                @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr it's like when a guy puts "linux admin experience" on their resume but they really mean "installed kali in a vm once," but times 1000

                viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dio9sys@haunted.computerD dio9sys@haunted.computer

                  @da_667

                  @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr it's like when a guy puts "linux admin experience" on their resume but they really mean "installed kali in a vm once," but times 1000

                  viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                  viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                  viss@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr worse - they used docker to light up kali once, and now theyre a combination devops, full stack dev, senior redteamer

                  someone in a signal chatgroup im in posted a link to some new popularity site for infosec influencers/grifters, and i investigated. its hosted on vercel, and the llm text instructions to generate the site content are in the sourcecode.

                  people self-label as a job they think is cool, and its all just lies

                  dio9sys@haunted.computerD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                    @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr worse - they used docker to light up kali once, and now theyre a combination devops, full stack dev, senior redteamer

                    someone in a signal chatgroup im in posted a link to some new popularity site for infosec influencers/grifters, and i investigated. its hosted on vercel, and the llm text instructions to generate the site content are in the sourcecode.

                    people self-label as a job they think is cool, and its all just lies

                    dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dio9sys@haunted.computer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @Viss

                    @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr vercel not beating the allegations of being the ai slop cdn

                    viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dio9sys@haunted.computerD dio9sys@haunted.computer

                      @Viss

                      @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr vercel not beating the allegations of being the ai slop cdn

                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      viss@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr i wish i could show you all the shit i pulled on the last assessment gig I did - they had stuff hosted in vercel, and i was able to loot the vercel token out of github via loose code perms and abusing actions, then once looted, theres no way to fix it other than to re-roll the api key. and vercel has bupkis for controlling api keys compared to aws. i had to propose an entire architecture change for their ci/cd pipeline to fix it

                      iagox86@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                        @Dio9sys @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr i wish i could show you all the shit i pulled on the last assessment gig I did - they had stuff hosted in vercel, and i was able to loot the vercel token out of github via loose code perms and abusing actions, then once looted, theres no way to fix it other than to re-roll the api key. and vercel has bupkis for controlling api keys compared to aws. i had to propose an entire architecture change for their ci/cd pipeline to fix it

                        iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iagox86@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr For no particular reason, I'm thinking of this line:

                        I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

                        Imagine doing a technical review and instead of reading feedback, they simply paste it into Claude. I'm not mentioning this for any particular reason of course

                        dio9sys@haunted.computerD s_wilson@mastodon.unoS 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • iagox86@infosec.exchangeI iagox86@infosec.exchange

                          @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr For no particular reason, I'm thinking of this line:

                          I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

                          Imagine doing a technical review and instead of reading feedback, they simply paste it into Claude. I'm not mentioning this for any particular reason of course

                          dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dio9sys@haunted.computerD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dio9sys@haunted.computer
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @iagox86

                          @Viss @da_667 @hrbrmstr it would really suck to be the person who has to do multiple rounds of that with a really fast turnaround time with someone who argues with every correction you suggest. If a job was like that then it would be really frustrating.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                            @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr fellas this was me last year interviewing interns. Some of the best schools in the country... and they were all caught using AI for their answers. Had to hire one of them. I spent over six months unteaching his reliance on AI. Just in time for him to leave.

                            I still have no idea if I made any measurable impact on his critical thinking and self-reliance. Sure as shit, he bullshitted all the things he did while he was here and all of the expertise he had (he in fact, did not) on his resume when I looked at his LinkedIn profile.. Expert detection engineer. He submitted a single rule to the ET ruleset the entire time he was here, and even that required heavy modification.

                            I was livid.

                            hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hotsoup@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Security is not an entry level position, probs a bit reductive, but at some point people do need to hire juniors. Everyone wants the unicorn. Ya'll. The people with years of experience, but for a bargain, the price of a junior. Nobody wants to be the one to glue a horn to a horse, they don't want to train a junior so they don't suck. Even if it's part of the job. This isn't unique to security. This is an epidemic of not hiring. Across multiple disciplines. An HR problem. At some point the would be juniors, fresh out of school, adapted and that meant fudging the resumes. Gotta put bread on the table somehow, those student loans aren't going to pay themselves and it's not like you can just go back to school. The system forced them to fake it till they make it, and so they're using the fake it till you make it machine. Break the cycle maybe?

                            viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hotsoup@infosec.exchangeH hotsoup@infosec.exchange

                              @da_667 @Viss @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Security is not an entry level position, probs a bit reductive, but at some point people do need to hire juniors. Everyone wants the unicorn. Ya'll. The people with years of experience, but for a bargain, the price of a junior. Nobody wants to be the one to glue a horn to a horse, they don't want to train a junior so they don't suck. Even if it's part of the job. This isn't unique to security. This is an epidemic of not hiring. Across multiple disciplines. An HR problem. At some point the would be juniors, fresh out of school, adapted and that meant fudging the resumes. Gotta put bread on the table somehow, those student loans aren't going to pay themselves and it's not like you can just go back to school. The system forced them to fake it till they make it, and so they're using the fake it till you make it machine. Break the cycle maybe?

                              viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              viss@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @hotsoup @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr my postition has always been that people who are experts in other domains, move into security laterally and take their domain expertise with them.

                              sysadmins and network folks make great redteamers because theyre intimately familiar with systems and networks ALREADY

                              devs and devops make great analysts because they can take those skills and apply them to the coding surfaces of security

                              iagox86@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • iagox86@infosec.exchangeI iagox86@infosec.exchange

                                @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr For no particular reason, I'm thinking of this line:

                                I spent more time than I should have correcting fundamentals. Eventually I stopped. He was not, in any meaningful sense, on the other side of the conversation

                                Imagine doing a technical review and instead of reading feedback, they simply paste it into Claude. I'm not mentioning this for any particular reason of course

                                s_wilson@mastodon.unoS This user is from outside of this forum
                                s_wilson@mastodon.unoS This user is from outside of this forum
                                s_wilson@mastodon.uno
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @iagox86 @Viss @Dio9sys @da_667 @hrbrmstr It reminds me of when I comment a pull request lately

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                                  @hotsoup @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr my postition has always been that people who are experts in other domains, move into security laterally and take their domain expertise with them.

                                  sysadmins and network folks make great redteamers because theyre intimately familiar with systems and networks ALREADY

                                  devs and devops make great analysts because they can take those skills and apply them to the coding surfaces of security

                                  iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iagox86@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iagox86@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @Viss @hotsoup @da_667 @hrbrmstr to quote @jeffmcjunkin, "security is a prestige class"

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                                    @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr the people who were already misrepresenting themselves and their skills, are now just empowered to be even worse using llms

                                    nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @Viss @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Two thoughts from the academic side:

                                    1) Higher ed is absolutely all in on AI. While I think there are some novel use cases, it comes down to two things. First, at least in most computing disciplines, the vast majority of research funding (which tenure-track faculty are required to get) is tied to AI usage at the moment. Second, we're largely being told - by industry - that it's going to be all AI, all the time in the future.

                                    To quote Upton Sinclair, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it." AI is, at the moment, deeply embedded into two of the biggest revenue streams for universities.

                                    We desperately need external people - ideally people tied to revenue streams - talking to Deans and Chairs about the problems associated with AI. The filter bubble is real.

                                    2) On the student side... the root problem here is that the tech industry has lost it's veneer of being an ideal (maybe even good) place to work. I broadly see less intrinsic motivation. I would cautiously say that working in tech now is perceived similarly to working in business/banking 15 years ago. Decreasing intrinsic motivation is very likely tied to students trying to find the quickest/easiest way through.

                                    viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange

                                      @Viss @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr Two thoughts from the academic side:

                                      1) Higher ed is absolutely all in on AI. While I think there are some novel use cases, it comes down to two things. First, at least in most computing disciplines, the vast majority of research funding (which tenure-track faculty are required to get) is tied to AI usage at the moment. Second, we're largely being told - by industry - that it's going to be all AI, all the time in the future.

                                      To quote Upton Sinclair, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it." AI is, at the moment, deeply embedded into two of the biggest revenue streams for universities.

                                      We desperately need external people - ideally people tied to revenue streams - talking to Deans and Chairs about the problems associated with AI. The filter bubble is real.

                                      2) On the student side... the root problem here is that the tech industry has lost it's veneer of being an ideal (maybe even good) place to work. I broadly see less intrinsic motivation. I would cautiously say that working in tech now is perceived similarly to working in business/banking 15 years ago. Decreasing intrinsic motivation is very likely tied to students trying to find the quickest/easiest way through.

                                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      viss@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @nerdpr0f @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr ive been cultivating this 'claude is your insider threat now' talk for months, and next week im servicing a customer with a tailored version of that talk, plus an llm workshop for how to use this stuff without rm'ing yourself or getting owned. i estimate this will become a template that other customers can purchase. so .. im not only working on it, i'll have an offering in a week to publish.

                                      nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                                        @nerdpr0f @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr ive been cultivating this 'claude is your insider threat now' talk for months, and next week im servicing a customer with a tailored version of that talk, plus an llm workshop for how to use this stuff without rm'ing yourself or getting owned. i estimate this will become a template that other customers can purchase. so .. im not only working on it, i'll have an offering in a week to publish.

                                        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @Viss @da_667 @iagox86 @hrbrmstr That kind of messaging would be helpful.

                                        We also really need to hear "AI is a contraindicator for quality" and something that speaks to DA's original point about how students that rely on AI are less attractive employees and will lead to lower placement rates.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hrbrmstr@mastodon.socialH hrbrmstr@mastodon.social

                                          Gosh this was a (recent) first-hand lived experience.

                                          I'm dismayed it's more prevalent than I hoped.

                                          Appearing Productive in The Workplace — No One's Happy

                                          AI can produce work that looks expert without being expert. The failure arrives in two shapes, and both are reshaping the workplace.

                                          favicon

                                          No One's Happy (nooneshappy.com)

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          jmcastagnetto@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jmcastagnetto@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jmcastagnetto@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @hrbrmstr

                                          This bit is very direct, hopefully we all survive and learn from 'the reckoning':

                                          ¨... The reckoning will not be subtle. The firms still doing the work properly will be in a position to charge for it. The firms that have hollowed themselves out will discover that what they hollowed out was the thing the client was paying for. ..."

                                          hrbrmstr@mastodon.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups