Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks?

What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
93 Posts 44 Posters 58 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • otacke@chaos.socialO otacke@chaos.social

    @johncarlosbaez Red deer is not the same as roe deer.

    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    @otacke - I don't know enough about these deer to be surprised! They sound like European or British deer to me. Do they have overlapping ranges?

    otacke@chaos.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT tpfto@mathstodon.xyz

      Roland Bulirsch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Bulirsch), one of the two people who wrote a numerical analysis textbook I frequently refer to (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21738-3), as well as someone who wrote quite a bit on the subject of elliptic integrals, was apparently a gym buddy of Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bulirsch, along with their other gym friends, took up a collection to help Schwarzenegger emigrate to America.

      hcschuetz@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      hcschuetz@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      hcschuetz@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      @tpfto
      Interesting!

      This fits with what I've heard in the 1980s: That he occasionally appeared in police TV movies playing muscular men. (I've never seen him appear, or maybe I just didn't recognize him because I've not been in his lectures. In the year I had numerics lectures, they were given by C. Reinsch.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

        What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

        davidsuculum@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidsuculum@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidsuculum@mathstodon.xyz
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        @johncarlosbaez I may cite two:

        - that the wave particle duality and the complementary principle are old fashioned ways of talking, that in modern quantum mechanics is preferred to talk about superposition and collapse of the wave function.

        - the concept of eusociality, a high level form of sociality, where individuals take care of the offspring of others... Edward O. Wilson says that we humans have a weak form of eusociality (Wikipedia).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lambo@openbiblio.socialL lambo@openbiblio.social

          @johncarlosbaez That a certain crystal structure of some material can suddenly not be produced anymore, a so called "disappearing polymorphism". I learned this from a recent episode of the "Veritasium" YouTube series. I was stunned, I still am. It seems we still do not really know how this happens. It is being hypothesized that a very tiny crystal is enough to "infect" the material to the effect of losing its polymorphism. There's also a very nice Wikipedia article about this.

          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          @Lambo - yes, this is amazing!

          Link Preview Image
          Disappearing polymorph - Wikipedia

          favicon

          (en.wikipedia.org)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF foldworks@mathstodon.xyz

            @johncarlosbaez "Identical twins do not have the same fingerprints however, because even within the confines of the womb, the fetuses touch different parts of their environment, giving rise to small variations in their corresponding prints and thus making them unique." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin#IdenticalTwins

            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            @foldworks - Wow! I'm not completely surprised because I didn't think fingerprints are stored genetically... it would take a lot of genes to store that information, and for what purpose? But it's interesting to hear how fingerprints get formed.

            This paper is cool:

            N. Hirokawa, Y. Tanaka, Y. Okada and S. Takeda, Nodal flow and the generation of left-right asymmetry, Cell 125 1 (2006), 33-45.

            It reports on detailed studies of how left-right asymmetry first shows in the development of animal embryos. It turns out this asymmetry is linked to certain genes. About half of the people with a genetic disorder called Kartagener's Syndrome have their organs in the reversed orientation. These people also have immotile sperm and defective cilia in their airway. This suggests that the genes controlling left-right asymmetry also affect the development of cilia! And the link has recently been understood...

            The first visible sign of left-right asymmetry in mammal embryos is the formation of a structure called the "ventral node" after the front-back (dorsal-ventral) and top-bottom (anterior-posterior) symmetries have been broken. This node is a small bump on the front of the embryo.

            It has recently been found that cilia on this bump wiggle in a way that makes the fluid the embryo is floating in flow towards the left. It seems to be this leftward flow that generates many of the more fancy left-right asymmetries that come later.

            How do these cilia generate a leftward flow? It seems they spin around clockwise, and are tilted in such a way that they make a leftward swing when they are near the surface of the embryo, and a rightward swing when they are far away!

            foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

              @foldworks - Wow! I'm not completely surprised because I didn't think fingerprints are stored genetically... it would take a lot of genes to store that information, and for what purpose? But it's interesting to hear how fingerprints get formed.

              This paper is cool:

              N. Hirokawa, Y. Tanaka, Y. Okada and S. Takeda, Nodal flow and the generation of left-right asymmetry, Cell 125 1 (2006), 33-45.

              It reports on detailed studies of how left-right asymmetry first shows in the development of animal embryos. It turns out this asymmetry is linked to certain genes. About half of the people with a genetic disorder called Kartagener's Syndrome have their organs in the reversed orientation. These people also have immotile sperm and defective cilia in their airway. This suggests that the genes controlling left-right asymmetry also affect the development of cilia! And the link has recently been understood...

              The first visible sign of left-right asymmetry in mammal embryos is the formation of a structure called the "ventral node" after the front-back (dorsal-ventral) and top-bottom (anterior-posterior) symmetries have been broken. This node is a small bump on the front of the embryo.

              It has recently been found that cilia on this bump wiggle in a way that makes the fluid the embryo is floating in flow towards the left. It seems to be this leftward flow that generates many of the more fancy left-right asymmetries that come later.

              How do these cilia generate a leftward flow? It seems they spin around clockwise, and are tilted in such a way that they make a leftward swing when they are near the surface of the embryo, and a rightward swing when they are far away!

              foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
              foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
              foldworks@mathstodon.xyz
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              @johncarlosbaez It's kind of 'obvious in hindsight', but I didn't know it until considering a hypothetical in a murder mystery.

              Are twins the worst plot device in some stories, after time travel? (And I *like* some stories featuring twins or time travel 😆)

              johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF foldworks@mathstodon.xyz

                @johncarlosbaez It's kind of 'obvious in hindsight', but I didn't know it until considering a hypothetical in a murder mystery.

                Are twins the worst plot device in some stories, after time travel? (And I *like* some stories featuring twins or time travel 😆)

                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #47

                @foldworks - special relativity manages to make good use of a story involving *both* twins and something akin to time travel. The Twin (Non)Paradox.

                forrcaho@hachyderm.ioF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyz

                  The last couple of weeks? Learning is what drives me, a week is quite a long time!

                  There are two things I learned from your posts: Donella Meadows' nine leverage points were quite engaging. Didn't talk about it much on-line, because there's so much to say! I found it to be a hopeful perspective, well worth any dread caused by talking about big problems. People I told about it mostly liked it!

                  The other is that I now have a picture of the 600-cell! I always felt, nah, that's too complicated, let's stick to the smaller ones. And then your explanation of @jasonhise's happened, and @henryseg showed off his models. That's so cool, now what do I do with it?

                  It's sort of on-topic for me, because I have been eyeing little facts about rendering hyperbolic spaces for a while. Since @Number_Cruncher reignited my interest in Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams, and all that comes with it. I think I owe them a shader for hyperbolic Coxeter groups. Sorry, been busy...

                  For one, I have now practical experience optimizing compressed data size by rewriting the uncompressed source. That's quite an odd thing to do, but I learned a ton about what my code actually needs to do. Oh and if you ever want to submit a shader you wrote to a demo competition, I might have something for you.

                  The other obsession that got lots of time was to write an ocaml module for conformal geometric algebra. That alone is a very beautiful subject! I want it to output math kernels for shaders. In the end I learned that typed-tagless-final is the name for the concise style to represent syntax trees I didn't dare to use, thanks @JacquesC2 for writing about it years ago!

                  You see, @johncarlosbaez, you're still important to me, and I miss our conversations!

                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #48

                  @RefurioAnachro - Why don't we have so many conversations anymore? I figured you either got bored of what I'm talking about or got too busy with other things.

                  I'm glad you have a better picture of the 600-cell now. One thing *I* want to do now is better understand all the fancy stuff about the geometry of the 600-cell that's on Wikipedia. That article has grown a lot since I last saw it:

                  Link Preview Image
                  600-cell - Wikipedia

                  favicon

                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                  A lot is written in ways that I have trouble quickly understanding. But some gems stand out, e.g.:

                  "The 600-cell can also be partitioned into 20 cell-disjoint intertwining rings of 30 cells, each ten edges long, forming a discrete Hopf fibration which fills the entire 600-cell."

                  and others seem like they could be great if I understood them. As a hobby I may try to understand this stuff and fit together the mental pictures.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bartoszmilewski@mathstodon.xyzB bartoszmilewski@mathstodon.xyz

                    @johncarlosbaez
                    Our worm-like ancestors were cyclops. When they decided to start swimming, the central eye squeezed out two side eyes and was itself reduced to the pineal gland that to this day regulates our circadian cycle.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Our modern vision evolved from an ancient one-eyed worm creature

                    The now extinct worm-like animal first lost paired eyes, then re-evolved them.

                    favicon

                    The Conversation (theconversation.com)

                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #49

                    @BartoszMilewski - wow, yikes! I didn't know that.

                    The eye, or should I say "a kind of eye", has evolved many times independently. You're making me want to understand not just the history of *our* eyes but *all* these eyes.

                    I'll have to read this:

                    • Bhattacharya, Stagg, Donlon and Hardy, Evolution and development of complex eyes: a celebration of diversity, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7578360/

                    dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rioda@mastodon.bida.imR rioda@mastodon.bida.im

                      @johncarlosbaez a historical bit, for a change: I was very shocked to learn that the few italian places that have "Romano" in their name, derive that not from "Roma" and "romano" as one might expect, but from quite the opposite: during the long war between the (Roman) Empire and the Langobards, those places took name from the upper class of the Langobards, i.e. the arimanni; "Romano", in the names of these places, comes from arimanni, not from "Roma" and "Romano".

                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #50

                      @rioDa - surprising indeed! I bet even the modern residents of some of these places would be surprised.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #51

                        @Heterokromia - wow, I didn't even know I had methanogenic archaea in my gut! I take statins. Is it bad to kill ones methanogenic archaea?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                          @BartoszMilewski - wow, yikes! I didn't know that.

                          The eye, or should I say "a kind of eye", has evolved many times independently. You're making me want to understand not just the history of *our* eyes but *all* these eyes.

                          I'll have to read this:

                          • Bhattacharya, Stagg, Donlon and Hardy, Evolution and development of complex eyes: a celebration of diversity, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7578360/

                          dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #52

                          @johncarlosbaez @BartoszMilewski
                          A few years ago I read that eyes evolved independently 7 times, but the current factoid seems to be more like 40 times, which is quite a difference.

                          I'm also puzzled: there are books from the 1950s that refer to the pineal glad as a mystical "third eye" -- obvious nonsense, but where did they get that from, if the origin of the pineal gland as a kind of eye is a much more modern discovery?

                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                            What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                            drdrowland@fediscience.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                            drdrowland@fediscience.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                            drdrowland@fediscience.org
                            wrote last edited by
                            #53

                            @johncarlosbaez

                            At 50km altitude on Venus the temperature and pressure is similar to Earth

                            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyz

                              @johncarlosbaez @BartoszMilewski
                              A few years ago I read that eyes evolved independently 7 times, but the current factoid seems to be more like 40 times, which is quite a difference.

                              I'm also puzzled: there are books from the 1950s that refer to the pineal glad as a mystical "third eye" -- obvious nonsense, but where did they get that from, if the origin of the pineal gland as a kind of eye is a much more modern discovery?

                              johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #54

                              @dougmerritt @BartoszMilewski - The Hindus have a tradition about a mystical "third eye", and Shiva is sometimes called the three-eyed lord. Later Descartes located the soul in the pineal gland. Maybe someone merged these ideas??? Worth checking out.

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_eye

                              Link Preview Image
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • drdrowland@fediscience.orgD drdrowland@fediscience.org

                                @johncarlosbaez

                                At 50km altitude on Venus the temperature and pressure is similar to Earth

                                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #55

                                @drdrowland - neat! But the air is... nitrogen, I guess? I don't see a good way for human life to take advantage of the nice pressure and temperature, but I never was good at inventions.

                                isaackuo@spacey.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                  What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghasshee@mathstodon.xyz
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #56

                                  @johncarlosbaez

                                  "Inside a jet engine, turbine blades are not just identical parts. Each one is uniquely measured, weighed and assigned a specific position. At speeds up to 18000rpm, the rotor experiences extreme centrifugal forces that multiply even the smallest weight difference."

                                  https://x.com/Scivf4/status/2050734328624169130?s=20

                                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G ghasshee@mathstodon.xyz

                                    @johncarlosbaez

                                    "Inside a jet engine, turbine blades are not just identical parts. Each one is uniquely measured, weighed and assigned a specific position. At speeds up to 18000rpm, the rotor experiences extreme centrifugal forces that multiply even the smallest weight difference."

                                    https://x.com/Scivf4/status/2050734328624169130?s=20

                                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #57

                                    @ghasshee - wow, I didn't know the planes I ride rely on handcrafted (or more precisely, individually machine-crafted) parts!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #58

                                      @buo - I should learn what this *means*. I once almost knew what a Kalman filter is, and I know it's extremely important. But I don't know what a phase-locked loop is.

                                      I love ODE, so this is embarassing! There's always room for progress.

                                      maxpool@mathstodon.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                        @drdrowland - neat! But the air is... nitrogen, I guess? I don't see a good way for human life to take advantage of the nice pressure and temperature, but I never was good at inventions.

                                        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        isaackuo@spacey.space
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #59

                                        @johncarlosbaez @drdrowland Geoffrey Landis has used this observation to propose both manned missions to Venus and colonization in Venus's atmosphere.

                                        Breathable air is a decent lifting gas, as the atmosphere is mostly CO2 (quite a bit heavier than both N2 and O2).

                                        johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • isaackuo@spacey.spaceI isaackuo@spacey.space

                                          @johncarlosbaez @drdrowland Geoffrey Landis has used this observation to propose both manned missions to Venus and colonization in Venus's atmosphere.

                                          Breathable air is a decent lifting gas, as the atmosphere is mostly CO2 (quite a bit heavier than both N2 and O2).

                                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #60

                                          @isaackuo @drdrowland - I see, so colonizing it via air-filled balloon-like floating structures?

                                          drdrowland@fediscience.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups