Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. As a thought experiment in reducing my exposure to being surveilled:

As a thought experiment in reducing my exposure to being surveilled:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
privacyenshittificatioinfosecaskfedishowerthoughts
13 Posts 5 Posters 37 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ike@pkm.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    ike@pkm.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    ike@pkm.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    As a thought experiment in reducing my exposure to being surveilled:

    What are the practical limitations of a wi-fi only (no sim card) phone-shaped device (a device not only with no active cellular connection, but also no hardware to silently ping towers) in living my day to fay life, and how much would it reduce my surveillance footprint?

    I hear some people still live without cell phones so it must be possible, but a balance?

    #privacy #enshittification #infosec #askfedi #showerthoughts

    mitch@hoagie.cloudM intrepidhero@vmst.ioI dazrunner@mastodon.socialD 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ike@pkm.socialI ike@pkm.social

      As a thought experiment in reducing my exposure to being surveilled:

      What are the practical limitations of a wi-fi only (no sim card) phone-shaped device (a device not only with no active cellular connection, but also no hardware to silently ping towers) in living my day to fay life, and how much would it reduce my surveillance footprint?

      I hear some people still live without cell phones so it must be possible, but a balance?

      #privacy #enshittification #infosec #askfedi #showerthoughts

      mitch@hoagie.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
      mitch@hoagie.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
      mitch@hoagie.cloud
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @ike imo the answer is to start relying on things that aren't embedded into your phone, and just switch to a flip phone that can, at best, send a text message.

      It means I have to carry an mp3 player around, but honestly that has upsides too. It's genuinely nice to listen to music and not expect a focus-interrupting push notification at any moment.

      intrepidhero@vmst.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ike@pkm.socialI ike@pkm.social

        As a thought experiment in reducing my exposure to being surveilled:

        What are the practical limitations of a wi-fi only (no sim card) phone-shaped device (a device not only with no active cellular connection, but also no hardware to silently ping towers) in living my day to fay life, and how much would it reduce my surveillance footprint?

        I hear some people still live without cell phones so it must be possible, but a balance?

        #privacy #enshittification #infosec #askfedi #showerthoughts

        intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
        intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
        intrepidhero@vmst.io
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @ike I think the crux of this is, can you live day to day without being reachable by phone or text?

        I go off grid a few times a year and it is incredibly freeing but my normal day to day responsibilities wouldn't allow me to do so for hours of every day year round.

        If you can get by with only async communications then the rest of what we use phones for has workarounds.

        ike@pkm.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mitch@hoagie.cloudM mitch@hoagie.cloud

          @ike imo the answer is to start relying on things that aren't embedded into your phone, and just switch to a flip phone that can, at best, send a text message.

          It means I have to carry an mp3 player around, but honestly that has upsides too. It's genuinely nice to listen to music and not expect a focus-interrupting push notification at any moment.

          intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
          intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
          intrepidhero@vmst.io
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @mitch @ike A flip phone still connects to cell towers and will enable location tracking.

          Even with a wifi device you'd want to only enable the radio when in range of trusted networks.

          mitch@hoagie.cloudM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • intrepidhero@vmst.ioI intrepidhero@vmst.io

            @mitch @ike A flip phone still connects to cell towers and will enable location tracking.

            Even with a wifi device you'd want to only enable the radio when in range of trusted networks.

            mitch@hoagie.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
            mitch@hoagie.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
            mitch@hoagie.cloud
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @intrepidhero @ike wasn't the stated goal _reduced surveillance_?

            intrepidhero@vmst.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mitch@hoagie.cloudM mitch@hoagie.cloud

              @intrepidhero @ike wasn't the stated goal _reduced surveillance_?

              intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
              intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
              intrepidhero@vmst.io
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @mitch @ike fair enough. Switching to a flip phone will eliminate web & app based smart phone tracking.

              ike@pkm.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • intrepidhero@vmst.ioI intrepidhero@vmst.io

                @mitch @ike fair enough. Switching to a flip phone will eliminate web & app based smart phone tracking.

                ike@pkm.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                ike@pkm.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                ike@pkm.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @intrepidhero @mitch

                Yeah I was thinking any kind of regular cell phone will still silently ping cell towers. I dont trust the OS on phones to respect the software command to turn off cellular activity.

                Im unsure how the form factor of the phone changes that. Eg does a flip phone physically disconnect the battery when its closed or something?

                intrepidhero@vmst.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ike@pkm.socialI ike@pkm.social

                  @intrepidhero @mitch

                  Yeah I was thinking any kind of regular cell phone will still silently ping cell towers. I dont trust the OS on phones to respect the software command to turn off cellular activity.

                  Im unsure how the form factor of the phone changes that. Eg does a flip phone physically disconnect the battery when its closed or something?

                  intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                  intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                  intrepidhero@vmst.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @ike @mitch It's not the form factor that's important but a dumb phone will at least eliminate tracking via app telemetry and web advertising, since it has neither.

                  But you're correct that it will still ping cell towers and I would expect that metadata is still available to law enforcement & government.

                  mitch@hoagie.cloudM 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                  • intrepidhero@vmst.ioI intrepidhero@vmst.io

                    @ike I think the crux of this is, can you live day to day without being reachable by phone or text?

                    I go off grid a few times a year and it is incredibly freeing but my normal day to day responsibilities wouldn't allow me to do so for hours of every day year round.

                    If you can get by with only async communications then the rest of what we use phones for has workarounds.

                    ike@pkm.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                    ike@pkm.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                    ike@pkm.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @intrepidhero I was thinking that Signal can send messages and conduct phone and video calls. As long as there is wifi, there is both sync and async communication.

                    intrepidhero@vmst.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ike@pkm.socialI ike@pkm.social

                      As a thought experiment in reducing my exposure to being surveilled:

                      What are the practical limitations of a wi-fi only (no sim card) phone-shaped device (a device not only with no active cellular connection, but also no hardware to silently ping towers) in living my day to fay life, and how much would it reduce my surveillance footprint?

                      I hear some people still live without cell phones so it must be possible, but a balance?

                      #privacy #enshittification #infosec #askfedi #showerthoughts

                      dazrunner@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dazrunner@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dazrunner@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @ike

                      Gotcha! Lol. They can track you through WIFI also. 🤪🤐🫣

                      Link Preview Image
                      Title: Unveiling the 7 Ways Your Phone Tracks Your Location

                      Location tracking, microphone listening, gyroscope movement tracking, keyword tracking, keyboard tracking, search tracking, camera tracking, network tracking,

                      favicon

                      DazSolar.com (dazsolar.com)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ike@pkm.socialI ike@pkm.social

                        @intrepidhero I was thinking that Signal can send messages and conduct phone and video calls. As long as there is wifi, there is both sync and async communication.

                        intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                        intrepidhero@vmst.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                        intrepidhero@vmst.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @ike Signal is a good thought. I don't know enough about its design to say whether its end-to-end encryption would hold up to a MITM on an untrusted network.

                        Untrusted wifi networks could also be doing device fingerprinting so there is the potential for location tracking.

                        These may be acceptable risks.

                        You would definitely want to uninstall or revoke background permissions for any apps that could send telemetry. That's probably the most effective first step you could take in any case.

                        upofadown@mstdn.caU 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • intrepidhero@vmst.ioI intrepidhero@vmst.io

                          @ike @mitch It's not the form factor that's important but a dumb phone will at least eliminate tracking via app telemetry and web advertising, since it has neither.

                          But you're correct that it will still ping cell towers and I would expect that metadata is still available to law enforcement & government.

                          mitch@hoagie.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mitch@hoagie.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mitch@hoagie.cloud
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @intrepidhero @ike just to chime in, yes, flip phones are absolutely the last electronic left with a battery that is intended to be user replaceable. You can just yank it when you want to. No trust involved.

                          I see dozens of brand new models out there with them as I type this. Back in the day, it was a feature! You could have a few charged ones and stay texting by swapping them out as the day wears on. We lost something with locking those away.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • intrepidhero@vmst.ioI intrepidhero@vmst.io

                            @ike Signal is a good thought. I don't know enough about its design to say whether its end-to-end encryption would hold up to a MITM on an untrusted network.

                            Untrusted wifi networks could also be doing device fingerprinting so there is the potential for location tracking.

                            These may be acceptable risks.

                            You would definitely want to uninstall or revoke background permissions for any apps that could send telemetry. That's probably the most effective first step you could take in any case.

                            upofadown@mstdn.caU This user is from outside of this forum
                            upofadown@mstdn.caU This user is from outside of this forum
                            upofadown@mstdn.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @intrepidhero @ike

                            >Signal is a good thought. I don't know enough about its design to say whether its end-to-end encryption would hold up to a MITM on an untrusted network.

                            Sure, just as long as you verify the "safety numbers" and keep them verified. As per normal...

                            Everything does TLS these days so there would not be much of a difference if you are specifically concerned about surveillance of "the last mile" network.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups