Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
41 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

    Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

    For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

    darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    darkling@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @cstross Linux shook most of those bugs out fairly rapidly by simply setting the initial value of the counter to 0xffffff00, and letting it overflow in less than 5 minutes after boot...

    cinebox@masto.hackers.townC alister@hachyderm.ioA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

      RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

      Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

      For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

      jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwz@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @cstross My various Macs currently have uptimes of 108, 94, 91, 83 and 55 days, so... no.

      Using their diagnostic on the machine I am typing this from: "Time until overflow: -1412h -52m -59s" and time_wait is 26.

      jwz@mastodon.socialJ dpnash@c.imD 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      0
      • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

        @cstross Linux introduced this bug multiple times in various forms, including several "oh god emergency reboot your systems" flavors. Windows 95 didn't do this, but IIRC Windows 2k had a similar at 180 days.

        What has me scratching my head at the moment is: what in the fuck people? This has been an issue with OS X since... uh... fuck, would have to be 2017-2018ish. It's not new!

        etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        etchedpixels@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @rootwyrm @cstross Linux was generally 497 days or so which of course people discovered.

        Windows was 10x quicker at dying but less people noticed 😎

        For a long time Linux then made sure it didn't happen again much by starting the timer close to the wrap value so it would fall over promptly.

        rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • darkling@mstdn.socialD darkling@mstdn.social

          @cstross Linux shook most of those bugs out fairly rapidly by simply setting the initial value of the counter to 0xffffff00, and letting it overflow in less than 5 minutes after boot...

          cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
          cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
          cinebox@masto.hackers.town
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @darkling @cstross oooh that’s a good solution I like that

          darkling@mstdn.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

            Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

            For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

            uilebheist@polyglot.cityU This user is from outside of this forum
            uilebheist@polyglot.cityU This user is from outside of this forum
            uilebheist@polyglot.city
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @cstross I had heard that about windows, but never met somebody who actually observed it (multiple days uptime? how would that happen?)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jwz@mastodon.socialJ jwz@mastodon.social

              @cstross My various Macs currently have uptimes of 108, 94, 91, 83 and 55 days, so... no.

              Using their diagnostic on the machine I am typing this from: "Time until overflow: -1412h -52m -59s" and time_wait is 26.

              jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwz@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @cstross Also the company reporting this seems to be in the business of creating AI-chatbot-to-iMessage spam firehoses, so one has to assume that their whole operation is vibe-coded...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                @cstross While I can believe there is a bug somewhere in the mac network stack, it definitely doesn't always cause things to crash after 49 days all the time. The machine i'm typing this on has been up for 170 days (and is due for a software update, come to think of it).

                benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB This user is from outside of this forum
                benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB This user is from outside of this forum
                benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

                mattblaze@federate.socialM cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

                  @darkling @cstross oooh that’s a good solution I like that

                  darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  darkling@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @cinebox @cstross (Of course, I've got the number wrong... that'd be 2.5 seconds at 100 Hz, or ¼s at 1kHz. The method still worked, even if I can't get that detail right.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

                    @rootwyrm @cstross Linux was generally 497 days or so which of course people discovered.

                    Windows was 10x quicker at dying but less people noticed 😎

                    For a long time Linux then made sure it didn't happen again much by starting the timer close to the wrap value so it would fall over promptly.

                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rootwyrm@weird.autos
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @etchedpixels @cstross nope and nope. I'd have to go dredging archives, but Linux has fucked up multiple, multiple times. Because there's multiple timers.
                    Also systemd has been the root of several incidents because it is the work of complete idiots.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me

                      @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @benjistokman @cstross Ah. That would explain it not affecting laptops in practice.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                        Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                        For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                        nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nske@ravenation.club
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @cstross The System 7 Macs we used back then were doing well if they got to 49 minutes.

                        cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                          Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                          For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                          oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oclsc@mstdn.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @cstross Such bugs are far older than that.

                          The place I studied as an undergrad had a PDP-10 for campus-wide time sharing. ca. 1979 official IT staff (not that they were called that) moved most of their effort to getting new VAXes going as replacements. As part of that, they cancelled the weekly downtime to run diagnostics on the PDP-10.

                          That revealed a long-standing bug in TOP-10: some internal counter (I forget what, can't have been simple uptime in clock ticks on a system with 36-bit words) overflowed after about a month of uptime, causing havoc.

                          I forget whether DEC supplied a fix, IT staff (or us students helping keep the -10 running) rolled our own, or we just scheduled monthly reboots.

                          oddhack@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nske@ravenation.clubN nske@ravenation.club

                            @cstross The System 7 Macs we used back then were doing well if they got to 49 minutes.

                            cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cstross@wandering.shop
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @nske I *never* managed to get a Windows 95/98/98SE/ME machine to stay up for more than 36 hours without crashing hard. There's a reason I migrated to Linux back in the kernel 1.2 era (then onto Mac OSX back when it was warmed-over NeXTStep rather than whatever bizarre horror show it has evolved into today, where I remain, trapped by apathy).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                              Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                              For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                              hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

                              hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • darkling@mstdn.socialD darkling@mstdn.social

                                @cstross Linux shook most of those bugs out fairly rapidly by simply setting the initial value of the counter to 0xffffff00, and letting it overflow in less than 5 minutes after boot...

                                alister@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alister@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alister@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @darkling @cstross Yep, though AIR (and with some old posts that back up the numbers) the lore was that Linux crashed after 497 days - for the same reason as Windows - but that the 497 days issue was found before any windows machine had successfully made it to 49.7...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                                  Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                                  For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                                  edavies@functional.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  edavies@functional.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  edavies@functional.cafe
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @cstross https://www.theregister.com/2020/04/02/boeing_787_power_cycle_51_days_stale_data

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                                    Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                                    For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                                    chigaze@cosocial.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chigaze@cosocial.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chigaze@cosocial.ca
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @cstross This is definitely not every Mac. We have a number of Macs running as servers with way more uptime than that. Plus I'd definitely have noticed if our FileMaker server that I manage was dying every month and half. Also the media server in my basement has way more uptime than that.

                                    Edit: Seeing reports it may be Tahoe only.

                                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                    • jwz@mastodon.socialJ jwz@mastodon.social

                                      @cstross My various Macs currently have uptimes of 108, 94, 91, 83 and 55 days, so... no.

                                      Using their diagnostic on the machine I am typing this from: "Time until overflow: -1412h -52m -59s" and time_wait is 26.

                                      dpnash@c.imD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dpnash@c.imD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dpnash@c.im
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @jwz @cstross

                                      Yeah, that’s more like my experience — sample size of one here, but it’s an M1 Mac Mini that stays up for months without anything like this happening. It only goes down when I turn it off to physically move it, which is uncommon.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                                        Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                                        For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                                        cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @cstross There must be an accidental work around because I’ve never hit it!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org

                                          @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

                                          hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @cstross First-gen white MacBook running Snow Leopard 10.6 (named "Tape Monitor 2" because ripping records and tapes is its primary purpose) needs a reboot every three months or so to sort out some weirdness with audio (a Griffin iMic and old version of Audacity are also involved)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups