Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Why are there so many articles about PLCs on the Internet where they specifically say they're vulnerable to attacks from Iran?

Why are there so many articles about PLCs on the Internet where they specifically say they're vulnerable to attacks from Iran?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
36 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloud

    @nerdpr0f @cR0w Figuring the same, causality could be the other way around. Iran takes up a lot of collective {mind,news}space right now, leaving writers to think "oh Damn what could They possibly Do to Our Sacred Infrastructure". The leap isn't far to grab the next best thing, it just turns out a general vulnerability is prone to abuse from Iranian hackers as well

    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @nerdpr0f @cR0w "their heinious foreign hacking" vs "our glorious protective FISA"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

      @cR0w @nerdpr0f even more important than that for power generation and distribution, it was the wildlife and the climate that was a bigger threat than any of those things.

      gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gsuberland@chaos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f weather, wildlife, and human error. the movie scenarios of mass cyber attacks are nonsense. most of the "cyber" happening with ICS/SCADA environments comes down to regular ransomware shit and phishing. even in the marine sector the biggest threat was pirate groups sending fake emails claiming to be the coastguard or a port authority telling the captain to redirect into unprotected waters, so they could steal the vessel's fuel. it ain't sophisticated at all.

      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

        @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f weather, wildlife, and human error. the movie scenarios of mass cyber attacks are nonsense. most of the "cyber" happening with ICS/SCADA environments comes down to regular ransomware shit and phishing. even in the marine sector the biggest threat was pirate groups sending fake emails claiming to be the coastguard or a port authority telling the captain to redirect into unprotected waters, so they could steal the vessel's fuel. it ain't sophisticated at all.

        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cr0w@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @gsuberland @da_667 @nerdpr0f I'm with you but you have to add the shitty firewall vulns in there in recent years too with ransomware and phishing.

        gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

          @gsuberland @da_667 @nerdpr0f I'm with you but you have to add the shitty firewall vulns in there in recent years too with ransomware and phishing.

          gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gsuberland@chaos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @cR0w @da_667 @nerdpr0f yeah point being it's overwhelmingly just regular IT stuff where the attackers aren't interested in the OT environments at all. and when they do want something novel, like on the ships, it's never sophisticated. just the most basic technique possible to get the result.

          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC gsuberland@chaos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

            @cR0w @da_667 @nerdpr0f yeah point being it's overwhelmingly just regular IT stuff where the attackers aren't interested in the OT environments at all. and when they do want something novel, like on the ships, it's never sophisticated. just the most basic technique possible to get the result.

            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cr0w@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @gsuberland @da_667 @nerdpr0f Ah, I gotcha. Yeah, people tend to think it's either an accident an actor made their way into OT space ( often is ) or they're targeting it and using whatever new mythical version of is discussed in the forums or Telegram channels or whatever.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

              @cR0w @da_667 @nerdpr0f yeah point being it's overwhelmingly just regular IT stuff where the attackers aren't interested in the OT environments at all. and when they do want something novel, like on the ships, it's never sophisticated. just the most basic technique possible to get the result.

              gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gsuberland@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @cR0w @da_667 @nerdpr0f hell even when it's state actors they just pick the simple stuff. IGRC needed to make it hard to navigate when they ("allegedly") stuck a limpet mine to the side of that fuel tanker near the Strait of Hormuz a few years ago. did they use an RCE to get into the ship's OT network, then pivot to the ECDIS to lock out navigation assistance? of course not, they just used a cheap radio jammer to make them lose GPS lock.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f when i worked at sempra energy, one of the things i got to do was "vendor security reviews". that means doing assessments on shit rando business units wanted to buy or setup.

                they would OPEN THE DISCUSSION with the phrase:

                "tell me when youre done with your assessment, so we can file the risk acceptance forms".

                meaning they had zero interest in the report, because they were gonna bypass it no matter what was in it

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                bakachu@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @Viss @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f i'm at the point now where that kind of honesty is refreshing. even though it's still terrible.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B bakachu@infosec.exchange

                  @Viss @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f i'm at the point now where that kind of honesty is refreshing. even though it's still terrible.

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  bakachu@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @Viss @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f ....buuuuut i'd then say something like 'oh ok and your CRO is going to sign off on that?'

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                    @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f

                    oh like target!
                    some hvac vendor came in and thats how they got all their registers infected.

                    yeah every time theres "big news"(tm) with nation state attackers everyone goes OH NO THEY CAN GO AFTER HYDRO AND POWER AND BANKS AND HOSPITALS

                    of course thats where they would go

                    all those verticals intentionally avoid security at nearly all cost all the time.

                    they're the lowest hanging fruit

                    tim_lavoie@cosocial.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tim_lavoie@cosocial.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tim_lavoie@cosocial.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @Viss @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f Have you ever tried to convince a doctor in a health care setting, that they actually have to log into things?

                    viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tim_lavoie@cosocial.caT tim_lavoie@cosocial.ca

                      @Viss @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f Have you ever tried to convince a doctor in a health care setting, that they actually have to log into things?

                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      viss@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @tim_lavoie @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f with two exceptions, every medical professional ive ever met or known outside of a professional setting squarely puts the 'tech' of their clinic or hospital into the "someone elses problem" category. their position is it should be up to the 'tech people' to sort that shit out.

                      every hospital/clinic ive ever talked to refused to pay more than $5 for anything IT or security related. like they just outright refuse. completely. every time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups