Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. @paco @BenAveling it is just a stupid electronic device

@paco @BenAveling it is just a stupid electronic device

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
597 Posts 265 Posters 298 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • shinspiegel@mastodon.socialS shinspiegel@mastodon.social

    @ki @elaine @paco not 100% sure if the intent of the OP of this was that, but Google, Apple already have a lot of data from your phone, so use the phone as the age verification device.

    ki@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    ki@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    ki@chaos.social
    wrote on last edited by
    #362

    @shinspiegel @elaine @paco
    which doesn't make things any better, though

    shinspiegel@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • xanatos@mastodon.gamedev.placeX This user is from outside of this forum
      xanatos@mastodon.gamedev.placeX This user is from outside of this forum
      xanatos@mastodon.gamedev.place
      wrote on last edited by
      #363

      @paco well
      If he does not remember his own password the account will be super secure.

      This is only true if a drive encryption is enabled.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
        paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
        paco@infosec.exchange
        wrote on last edited by
        #364

        @killick Agreed. C-level execs care a lot about their own skin and their own money. Put it at risk and things will change. Let them throw a third party under the bus and they won’t.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          paco@infosec.exchange
          wrote on last edited by
          #365

          @alice I love this headline from the Beaverton.

          https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/05/rogers-celebrates-20-years-of-higher-than-expected-call-volumes/

          @roohafzaluvr

          sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
            paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
            paco@infosec.exchange
            wrote on last edited by
            #366

            @x41h Go!
            @punissuer

            Link Preview Image
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bkahn@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
              bkahn@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
              bkahn@beige.party
              wrote on last edited by
              #367

              @alice @roohafzaluvr @paco

              My first thought is:

              "Due to our totally shitty and essentially non-existent customer service, we are experiencing higher than average call volumes. The current wait time is three days, seven hours, nineteen minutes. Your call is important to us but not as important as reducing staff to goose profits. Please hold for the next available representative."
              😩

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • paco@infosec.exchangeP paco@infosec.exchange

                @alice I love this headline from the Beaverton.

                https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/05/rogers-celebrates-20-years-of-higher-than-expected-call-volumes/

                @roohafzaluvr

                sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                sir_osis_of_liver@beige.party
                wrote on last edited by
                #368

                @paco @alice @roohafzaluvr

                I fucking hate Rogers. When they took over Fundy Cable, the service got worse and prices increased. The call centre was farmed out to lord knows where and when I moved, they wanted me to drive the cable box to Saint John from Fredericton, which I refused to do. They relented and I dropped it at the local Rogers store.

                Years later, when Rogers bought out Shaw (who I was happy with), I again had to move. It took three hours on the phone to cancel my service because you couldn't do it online for whatever reason, and had to pay $340 to close the contract.

                Fuck those guys.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bob_zim@infosec.exchange
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #369

                  @alice @roohafzaluvr @paco “We value your privacy … at about 35¢.”

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sir_osis_of_liver@beige.party
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #370

                    @alice @paco @roohafzaluvr

                    Oh, jeeze that's enraging.

                    When I was working in the US, I heard a lot of stories about Comcast, none good.

                    What I hate is I was happy with NBTel, Fundy Cable and later Shaw Cable. They were bought out by Rogers or Bell Canada, the conglomerates with the worst customer satisfaction scores in the country.

                    The regulator just rubber stamped the deals without paying any attention to public feedback.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ki@chaos.socialK ki@chaos.social

                      @shinspiegel @elaine @paco
                      which doesn't make things any better, though

                      shinspiegel@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shinspiegel@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shinspiegel@mastodon.social
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #371

                      @ki @elaine @paco nope, but at least it isn’t a third party validating…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • globcoco@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                        globcoco@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                        globcoco@mamot.fr
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #372

                        @elaine @paco

                        To Google? Yeeees. That is a great idea. #sarcasm

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #373

                          @globcoco@mamot.fr @paco@infosec.exchange Do you think your bank is better at cyber security than Google? You give them the same information.

                          The alternative is giving photos of your photo ID to random websites with no full-time security team.

                          If the data is collected who has a objectively better cyber security team? Google or a random adult videos website.

                          We do have an alternative to age verification and it's censorship. It could just be illegal to transmit material harmful to minors across state lines. No age verification because there's no material to age gate.

                          Unless you're willing to actively advocate that there should be zero safe guards to prevent a small child or teenager from being exposed to the materials, for the sake of adults having easier access to the material.

                          Governments are going to do something. We can either present them with options that avoid harm as much as possibl, or we can stay silent l, and let them decide and it'll probably mean everyone loses. You might have to provide a government ID to use the internet, and there's censorship.

                          globcoco@mamot.frG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #374

                            @shinspiegel@mastodon.social @ki@chaos.social @paco@infosec.exchange The LLM thing is a bit overblown. Contrary to popular beliefs, large language models do have practical size limits in terms of being able to perform inference. If we collected every single chat message, social media message, every keystroke of every user in the world, the language model would be too big. So instead of a library of all of the information in the world, you need the most popular and most relevant information.

                            Both xAi and Perplexity both use retrieval augmented generation, a process where they collect information from their index and pass to the prompt, of social media posts rather than including them in the model.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • troed@swecyb.comT troed@swecyb.com

                              @paco No one should let anyone get away with "third party". Your subcontractor - you own it, just as if it had been your own employees. Don't like it? Don't outsource your responsibilities.

                              oscherler@tooting.chO This user is from outside of this forum
                              oscherler@tooting.chO This user is from outside of this forum
                              oscherler@tooting.ch
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #375

                              @troed @paco Do you think they wouldn’t have been hacked if discord did it themselves? The outsourcing is a red herring.

                              paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • oscherler@tooting.chO oscherler@tooting.ch

                                @troed @paco Do you think they wouldn’t have been hacked if discord did it themselves? The outsourcing is a red herring.

                                paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paco@infosec.exchange
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #376

                                I suspect we are all in agreement. Discord is trying to blame a third party to make it seem like they did everything right; that the situation is just that their vendor let them down. None of us think that’s a reasonable excuse, nor that anyone should consider it an acceptable response in these circumstances.
                                @oscherler @troed

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ? Guest

                                  @globcoco@mamot.fr @paco@infosec.exchange Do you think your bank is better at cyber security than Google? You give them the same information.

                                  The alternative is giving photos of your photo ID to random websites with no full-time security team.

                                  If the data is collected who has a objectively better cyber security team? Google or a random adult videos website.

                                  We do have an alternative to age verification and it's censorship. It could just be illegal to transmit material harmful to minors across state lines. No age verification because there's no material to age gate.

                                  Unless you're willing to actively advocate that there should be zero safe guards to prevent a small child or teenager from being exposed to the materials, for the sake of adults having easier access to the material.

                                  Governments are going to do something. We can either present them with options that avoid harm as much as possibl, or we can stay silent l, and let them decide and it'll probably mean everyone loses. You might have to provide a government ID to use the internet, and there's censorship.

                                  globcoco@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  globcoco@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  globcoco@mamot.fr
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #377

                                  @elaine @paco

                                  Google is not the answer though.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • betonglen@indieweb.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    betonglen@indieweb.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    betonglen@indieweb.social
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #378

                                    @paco

                                    thank you for sharing and you all for your service 🙏🏾✌🏾🖖🏾

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.townB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.townB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.town
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #379

                                      @paco This is so cool! Thank you for sharing the process. This inspires me 💖

                                      paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.townB b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.town

                                        @paco This is so cool! Thank you for sharing the process. This inspires me 💖

                                        paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        paco@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #380

                                        @b_cavello I’m glad! I think it’s fun. I’ve been doing it off and on for 20 years. (I lived outside the US for 10). Almost any eligible voter can be an election officer in most jurisdictions. It’s easy to try once, and no big deal if you don’t like it and don’t do it again.

                                        b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.townB 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • paco@infosec.exchangeP paco@infosec.exchange

                                          @b_cavello I’m glad! I think it’s fun. I’ve been doing it off and on for 20 years. (I lived outside the US for 10). Almost any eligible voter can be an election officer in most jurisdictions. It’s easy to try once, and no big deal if you don’t like it and don’t do it again.

                                          b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.townB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.townB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          b_cavello@mastodon.publicinterest.town
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #381

                                          @paco I live in DC, and I feel like they’re overwhelmed with volunteers, but maybe not for special election stuff. I’d like to try it! These quiet moments of democracy in action are really beautiful

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups