Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. In her magnificent 2023 book *Doppelganger*, Naomi Klein describes the "mirror world" of right wing causes that are weird, conspiratorial versions of the actual things that leftists care about:

In her magnificent 2023 book *Doppelganger*, Naomi Klein describes the "mirror world" of right wing causes that are weird, conspiratorial versions of the actual things that leftists care about:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
42 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    After the election, Mamdani doubled down on his pursuit of high-quality services. In his inaugural speech, Mamdani promised a government "where excellence is no longer the exception":

    nytimes.com

    favicon

    (www.nytimes.com)

    Robin was also developing his appreciation for Mamadani's vision of public excellence. In the *New York Review of Books*, Robin made the case that it was a mistake for Democrats to have ceded the language of efficiency and quality to Republicans:

    Link Preview Image
    Democratic Excellence | Corey Robin

    Among Zohran Mamdani’s rhetorical innovations has been his declaration of war on mediocrity.

    favicon

    The New York Review of Books (www.nybooks.com)

    13/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.fr
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Where Democrats do talk about efficiency, they talk about it in Republican terms: "We'll run the government like a business." Mamdani, by contrast, talks about running the government like a *government* - a *good* government, a government committed to excellence.

    Writing in *Jacobin*, Conor Lynch takes a trip into the good side of the mirror world, unpacking the idea of socialist excellence in Mamdani's governance promises:

    Link Preview Image
    Zohran Mamdani Wants to Reclaim Efficiency From the Right

    New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani is trying to demonstrate that the public sector can match or even surpass the private sector in excellence. It’s high time the Left reclaimed the value of “efficiency” from right-wing forces of privatization and austerity.

    favicon

    (jacobin.com)

    14/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      Where Democrats do talk about efficiency, they talk about it in Republican terms: "We'll run the government like a business." Mamdani, by contrast, talks about running the government like a *government* - a *good* government, a government committed to excellence.

      Writing in *Jacobin*, Conor Lynch takes a trip into the good side of the mirror world, unpacking the idea of socialist excellence in Mamdani's governance promises:

      Link Preview Image
      Zohran Mamdani Wants to Reclaim Efficiency From the Right

      New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani is trying to demonstrate that the public sector can match or even surpass the private sector in excellence. It’s high time the Left reclaimed the value of “efficiency” from right-wing forces of privatization and austerity.

      favicon

      (jacobin.com)

      14/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      During the Mamdani campaign, "efficiency" was one plank of the platform. But once Mamdani took office, he learned his predecessor, the lavishly corrupt Eric Adams, lied about the city's finances, leaving a $12b hole in the budget:

      Link Preview Image
      Mayor Mamdani Details “Adams Budget Crisis”

      favicon

      The official website of the City of New York (www.nyc.gov)

      Mamdani came to power in New York on an ambitious platform of public service delivery, and not just because this is the right thing to do, but because investment in a city's people and built environment pays off handsomely.

      15/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        During the Mamdani campaign, "efficiency" was one plank of the platform. But once Mamdani took office, he learned his predecessor, the lavishly corrupt Eric Adams, lied about the city's finances, leaving a $12b hole in the budget:

        Link Preview Image
        Mayor Mamdani Details “Adams Budget Crisis”

        favicon

        The official website of the City of New York (www.nyc.gov)

        Mamdani came to power in New York on an ambitious platform of public service delivery, and not just because this is the right thing to do, but because investment in a city's people and built environment pays off handsomely.

        15/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.fr
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Maintenance is always cheaper than repair. A main differences between a business and a government is that a business's shareholders can starve maintenance budgets, cash out, and leave the collapsing firm behind them, while governments must think about the long term consequences of short-term thinking (the fact that so many Democratic governments have failed to do this is a consequence of Democrats adopting Republicans' framing that a good government is "run like a business").

        16/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          Maintenance is always cheaper than repair. A main differences between a business and a government is that a business's shareholders can starve maintenance budgets, cash out, and leave the collapsing firm behind them, while governments must think about the long term consequences of short-term thinking (the fact that so many Democratic governments have failed to do this is a consequence of Democrats adopting Republicans' framing that a good government is "run like a business").

          16/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          The best time to invest in New York City was 20 years ago. The second best time in now. For Mamdani to make those investments and correct the failures of his predecessors, he needs to find some money.

          Mamdani's proposal for finding this money sounds pretty conservative: he's going to cut waste in government. He's ordered each city agency to appoint a "Chief Savings Officer" who will "review performance, eliminate waste and streamline service delivery."

          17/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            The best time to invest in New York City was 20 years ago. The second best time in now. For Mamdani to make those investments and correct the failures of his predecessors, he needs to find some money.

            Mamdani's proposal for finding this money sounds pretty conservative: he's going to cut waste in government. He's ordered each city agency to appoint a "Chief Savings Officer" who will "review performance, eliminate waste and streamline service delivery."

            17/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.fr
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            These CSOs are supposed to find a 1.5% across-the-board savings this year and 2.5% next year:

            Link Preview Image
            Mayor Mamdani Signs Executive Order to Require Chief Savings Officers Across City Agencies, Bolster City Performance

            favicon

            The official website of the City of New York (www.nyc.gov)

            Does this sound like DOGE to you? It kind of does to me, but - crucially - this is *mirror-world* DOGE. DOGE's project was making government cuts in order to make government "run like a business." Specifically, DOGE wanted to transform the government into the kind of business that makes cuts to juice the quarterly numbers at the expense of long-term health:

            18/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              These CSOs are supposed to find a 1.5% across-the-board savings this year and 2.5% next year:

              Link Preview Image
              Mayor Mamdani Signs Executive Order to Require Chief Savings Officers Across City Agencies, Bolster City Performance

              favicon

              The official website of the City of New York (www.nyc.gov)

              Does this sound like DOGE to you? It kind of does to me, but - crucially - this is *mirror-world* DOGE. DOGE's project was making government cuts in order to make government "run like a business." Specifically, DOGE wanted to transform the government into the kind of business that makes cuts to juice the quarterly numbers at the expense of long-term health:

              18/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              forbes.com

              favicon

              (www.forbes.com)

              But Mamdani's mirror-world DOGE is looking to find efficiencies by cutting things like sweetheart deals with private contractors and consultants, who cost the city billions. It's these private sector delegates of the state that are the source of government waste and bloat.

              19/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                forbes.com

                favicon

                (www.forbes.com)

                But Mamdani's mirror-world DOGE is looking to find efficiencies by cutting things like sweetheart deals with private contractors and consultants, who cost the city billions. It's these private sector delegates of the state that are the source of government waste and bloat.

                19/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                The literature is clear on this: when governments eliminate their own capacity to serve the people and hire corporations to do it on their behalf, the corporations charge more and deliver less:

                Link Preview Image
                My turn: Public-private partnerships are an industry gimmick that don’t serve public well

                Don't waste public tax money. Caltrans public employees can do road projects more efficiently than private contractors without as many cost overruns.

                favicon

                CalMatters (calmatters.org)

                As Lynch writes, DOGE's purpose was to dismantle as much of the government as possible and shift its duties to Beltway Bandits who could milk Uncle Sucker for every dime.

                20/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  The literature is clear on this: when governments eliminate their own capacity to serve the people and hire corporations to do it on their behalf, the corporations charge more and deliver less:

                  Link Preview Image
                  My turn: Public-private partnerships are an industry gimmick that don’t serve public well

                  Don't waste public tax money. Caltrans public employees can do road projects more efficiently than private contractors without as many cost overruns.

                  favicon

                  CalMatters (calmatters.org)

                  As Lynch writes, DOGE's purpose was to dismantle as much of the government as possible and shift its duties to Beltway Bandits who could milk Uncle Sucker for every dime.

                  20/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Mamdani's ambition, meanwhile, is to "restore faith in government [and] demonstrate that the public sector can match or even surpass the private sector in excellence."

                  As Mamdani said in his inauguration speech, "For too long, we have turned to the private sector for greatness, while accepting mediocrity from those who serve the public."

                  Turning governments into businesses has been an unmitigated failure.

                  21/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    Mamdani's ambition, meanwhile, is to "restore faith in government [and] demonstrate that the public sector can match or even surpass the private sector in excellence."

                    As Mamdani said in his inauguration speech, "For too long, we have turned to the private sector for greatness, while accepting mediocrity from those who serve the public."

                    Turning governments into businesses has been an unmitigated failure.

                    21/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    After decades of outsourcing, the government hasn't managed to shrink its payroll, but government workers are today primarily employed in wheedling private contractors to fulfill their promises, even as public spending has quintupled:

                    Link Preview Image
                    Is government too big? Reflections on the size and composition of today’s federal government | Brookings

                    Elaine Kamarck analyzes government failures and propose reforms to boost federal performance, accountability, and trust.

                    favicon

                    Brookings (www.brookings.edu)

                    Instead of having a government employee do a government job, that govvie oversees a private contractor who costs twice as much...and sucks at their job:

                    Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                    favicon

                    (www.pogo.org)

                    22/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      After decades of outsourcing, the government hasn't managed to shrink its payroll, but government workers are today primarily employed in wheedling private contractors to fulfill their promises, even as public spending has quintupled:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Is government too big? Reflections on the size and composition of today’s federal government | Brookings

                      Elaine Kamarck analyzes government failures and propose reforms to boost federal performance, accountability, and trust.

                      favicon

                      Brookings (www.brookings.edu)

                      Instead of having a government employee do a government job, that govvie oversees a private contractor who costs twice as much...and sucks at their job:

                      Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                      favicon

                      (www.pogo.org)

                      22/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      There's a wonderful illustration of this principle at work in Snowden's memoir *Permanent Record*:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Permanent Record: Edward Snowden and the making of a whistleblower – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX

                      favicon

                      (memex.craphound.com)

                      After Snowden broke his legs during special forces training and washed out, he went the NSA. After a couple years, his boss told him Congress capped the spy agencies' headcount but not their budgets, so he was going to have to quit his job and go to work for one of the NSA's many contractors, because the NSA could hire as many contractors as it wanted.

                      23/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        There's a wonderful illustration of this principle at work in Snowden's memoir *Permanent Record*:

                        Link Preview Image
                        Permanent Record: Edward Snowden and the making of a whistleblower – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX

                        favicon

                        (memex.craphound.com)

                        After Snowden broke his legs during special forces training and washed out, he went the NSA. After a couple years, his boss told him Congress capped the spy agencies' headcount but not their budgets, so he was going to have to quit his job and go to work for one of the NSA's many contractors, because the NSA could hire as many contractors as it wanted.

                        23/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        So Snowden is sent to a recruiter who asks him how much he's making as a government spy. Snowden quotes a modest 5-figure sum. The recruiter is aghast and tells Snowden that he gets paid a percentage of whatever Snowden ends up making as a government contractor, and promptly triples Snowden's government salary. Why not? The spy agencies have unlimited budgets, and will pay whatever the private company that Snowden nominally works for bills them at. Everybody wins!

                        24/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                          So Snowden is sent to a recruiter who asks him how much he's making as a government spy. Snowden quotes a modest 5-figure sum. The recruiter is aghast and tells Snowden that he gets paid a percentage of whatever Snowden ends up making as a government contractor, and promptly triples Snowden's government salary. Why not? The spy agencies have unlimited budgets, and will pay whatever the private company that Snowden nominally works for bills them at. Everybody wins!

                          24/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Ladies and gentlemen, the efficiency of government outsourcing. Run the government like a business!

                          As bad as this is when the government hires outside contractors to *do things*, it's even worse when they hire outside contractors to *consult on things*. Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Canadian government spent a fortune on consultants, especially at the start of the pandemic:

                          Link Preview Image
                          Pluralistic: Canada’s privatised shadow civil service (31 Jan 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                          favicon

                          (pluralistic.net)

                          25/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            Ladies and gentlemen, the efficiency of government outsourcing. Run the government like a business!

                            As bad as this is when the government hires outside contractors to *do things*, it's even worse when they hire outside contractors to *consult on things*. Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Canadian government spent a fortune on consultants, especially at the start of the pandemic:

                            Link Preview Image
                            Pluralistic: Canada’s privatised shadow civil service (31 Jan 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                            favicon

                            (pluralistic.net)

                            25/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.fr
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            The main beneficiary of these contracts was McKinsey, who were given a blank cheque and no oversight - they were even exempted from rules requiring them to disclose conflicts of interest.

                            Trudeau raised Canadian government spending by 40%, to $11.8 billion, creating a "shadow civil service" that cost vastly more than the actual civil service - the government spent $1.85b on internal IT expertise, and $2.3b on outside contractors.

                            26/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                              The main beneficiary of these contracts was McKinsey, who were given a blank cheque and no oversight - they were even exempted from rules requiring them to disclose conflicts of interest.

                              Trudeau raised Canadian government spending by 40%, to $11.8 billion, creating a "shadow civil service" that cost vastly more than the actual civil service - the government spent $1.85b on internal IT expertise, and $2.3b on outside contractors.

                              26/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.fr
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              Contractors produced some of the worst IT boondoggles in government history, including the bungled "ArriveCAN" contact tracing program. The two-person shop that won the contract outsourced it to KPMG and raked off a 15-30% commission.

                              Before Trudeau, Harper paid IBM for Phoenix - a failed payroll system that was, amazingly, *far worse* than ArriveCAN. IBM got $309m to build Phoenix, and then Canada spent another $506m to fix it and compensate the people whose lives it ruined.

                              27/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                Contractors produced some of the worst IT boondoggles in government history, including the bungled "ArriveCAN" contact tracing program. The two-person shop that won the contract outsourced it to KPMG and raked off a 15-30% commission.

                                Before Trudeau, Harper paid IBM for Phoenix - a failed payroll system that was, amazingly, *far worse* than ArriveCAN. IBM got $309m to build Phoenix, and then Canada spent another $506m to fix it and compensate the people whose lives it ruined.

                                27/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                Wherever you find these contractors, you find stupendous waste and fraud. I remember in the early 2000s, when Dan "City of Sound" Hill was working at the BBC and wanted to try an experiment to distribute MP3s of a radio programme.

                                The BBC - an organization with a long history of technical excellence - had given the exclusive contract for web delivery to Siemens, who wanted £10,000 to set up a web-server for the experiment.

                                28/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                  Wherever you find these contractors, you find stupendous waste and fraud. I remember in the early 2000s, when Dan "City of Sound" Hill was working at the BBC and wanted to try an experiment to distribute MP3s of a radio programme.

                                  The BBC - an organization with a long history of technical excellence - had given the exclusive contract for web delivery to Siemens, who wanted £10,000 to set up a web-server for the experiment.

                                  28/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  Dan bought rented a server from an online provider and put it all on his personal card, serving tens of thousands of MP3s for less than £10. It turns out that letting your technical personnel do your technology development costs 1/1000th of what it costs to have contractors do it.

                                  Running your public institution "like a business" is incredibly *inefficient*.

                                  29/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                    Dan bought rented a server from an online provider and put it all on his personal card, serving tens of thousands of MP3s for less than £10. It turns out that letting your technical personnel do your technology development costs 1/1000th of what it costs to have contractors do it.

                                    Running your public institution "like a business" is incredibly *inefficient*.

                                    29/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    Back when Musk and Ramaswamy announced their plan to cut $2t from the US federal budget, David Dayen published a plan to realize nearly that much savings just by attacking waste arising from running the government "like a business":

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Pluralistic: It’s pretty easy to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget, actually (27 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                                    favicon

                                    (pluralistic.net)

                                    The US government's own estimate of the losses due to contractor *fraud* comes out to $274b/year - roughly the size of the *entire civil service payroll*.

                                    30/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      Back when Musk and Ramaswamy announced their plan to cut $2t from the US federal budget, David Dayen published a plan to realize nearly that much savings just by attacking waste arising from running the government "like a business":

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Pluralistic: It’s pretty easy to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget, actually (27 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                                      favicon

                                      (pluralistic.net)

                                      The US government's own estimate of the losses due to contractor *fraud* comes out to $274b/year - roughly the size of the *entire civil service payroll*.

                                      30/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      (The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which Musk sadistically destroyed, accounts for 0.012% of federal spending.)

                                      Medicare "upcoding" - a form of fraud committed by companies like United Healthcare, the largest Medicare Advantage provider in the country - costs the public $83b/year:

                                      https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Mar24_ExecutiveSummary_MedPAC_Report_To_Congress_SEC.pdf

                                      31/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                        (The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which Musk sadistically destroyed, accounts for 0.012% of federal spending.)

                                        Medicare "upcoding" - a form of fraud committed by companies like United Healthcare, the largest Medicare Advantage provider in the country - costs the public $83b/year:

                                        https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Mar24_ExecutiveSummary_MedPAC_Report_To_Congress_SEC.pdf

                                        31/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        Congress has banned Medicare and Medicaid from bargaining for pharma prices, which is why the US government pays 178% more than other governments, for the same drugs, which are often developed at public expense:

                                        403 Forbidden

                                        favicon

                                        (aspe.hhs.gov)

                                        The Pentagon is a cesspit of waste. It's not just firing spies and rehiring them as contractors at a 300% markup - that's just for starters. The Pentagon receives $840b/year and has failed its last three audits:

                                        Access to this page has been denied

                                        px-captcha

                                        favicon

                                        (thehill.com)

                                        32/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          Congress has banned Medicare and Medicaid from bargaining for pharma prices, which is why the US government pays 178% more than other governments, for the same drugs, which are often developed at public expense:

                                          403 Forbidden

                                          favicon

                                          (aspe.hhs.gov)

                                          The Pentagon is a cesspit of waste. It's not just firing spies and rehiring them as contractors at a 300% markup - that's just for starters. The Pentagon receives $840b/year and has failed its last three audits:

                                          Access to this page has been denied

                                          px-captcha

                                          favicon

                                          (thehill.com)

                                          32/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          The conservative version of "efficiency" cashes out to "efficient at extracting value from public institutions, workers and customers." Mamdani's (good) mirror world "efficiency" means providing great public service through investing in public excellence.

                                          New York City is overdue for this kind of overhaul. Everywhere you look in the city, you find high price consultants making out like bandits and starving the city of the funds it needs to deliver.

                                          33/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups