Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. In her magnificent 2023 book *Doppelganger*, Naomi Klein describes the "mirror world" of right wing causes that are weird, conspiratorial versions of the actual things that leftists care about:

In her magnificent 2023 book *Doppelganger*, Naomi Klein describes the "mirror world" of right wing causes that are weird, conspiratorial versions of the actual things that leftists care about:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
42 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    The best time to invest in New York City was 20 years ago. The second best time in now. For Mamdani to make those investments and correct the failures of his predecessors, he needs to find some money.

    Mamdani's proposal for finding this money sounds pretty conservative: he's going to cut waste in government. He's ordered each city agency to appoint a "Chief Savings Officer" who will "review performance, eliminate waste and streamline service delivery."

    17/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.fr
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    These CSOs are supposed to find a 1.5% across-the-board savings this year and 2.5% next year:

    Link Preview Image
    Mayor Mamdani Signs Executive Order to Require Chief Savings Officers Across City Agencies, Bolster City Performance

    favicon

    The official website of the City of New York (www.nyc.gov)

    Does this sound like DOGE to you? It kind of does to me, but - crucially - this is *mirror-world* DOGE. DOGE's project was making government cuts in order to make government "run like a business." Specifically, DOGE wanted to transform the government into the kind of business that makes cuts to juice the quarterly numbers at the expense of long-term health:

    18/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      These CSOs are supposed to find a 1.5% across-the-board savings this year and 2.5% next year:

      Link Preview Image
      Mayor Mamdani Signs Executive Order to Require Chief Savings Officers Across City Agencies, Bolster City Performance

      favicon

      The official website of the City of New York (www.nyc.gov)

      Does this sound like DOGE to you? It kind of does to me, but - crucially - this is *mirror-world* DOGE. DOGE's project was making government cuts in order to make government "run like a business." Specifically, DOGE wanted to transform the government into the kind of business that makes cuts to juice the quarterly numbers at the expense of long-term health:

      18/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      But Mamdani's mirror-world DOGE is looking to find efficiencies by cutting things like sweetheart deals with private contractors and consultants, who cost the city billions. It's these private sector delegates of the state that are the source of government waste and bloat.

      19/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        forbes.com

        favicon

        (www.forbes.com)

        But Mamdani's mirror-world DOGE is looking to find efficiencies by cutting things like sweetheart deals with private contractors and consultants, who cost the city billions. It's these private sector delegates of the state that are the source of government waste and bloat.

        19/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.fr
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        The literature is clear on this: when governments eliminate their own capacity to serve the people and hire corporations to do it on their behalf, the corporations charge more and deliver less:

        Link Preview Image
        My turn: Public-private partnerships are an industry gimmick that don’t serve public well

        Don't waste public tax money. Caltrans public employees can do road projects more efficiently than private contractors without as many cost overruns.

        favicon

        CalMatters (calmatters.org)

        As Lynch writes, DOGE's purpose was to dismantle as much of the government as possible and shift its duties to Beltway Bandits who could milk Uncle Sucker for every dime.

        20/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          The literature is clear on this: when governments eliminate their own capacity to serve the people and hire corporations to do it on their behalf, the corporations charge more and deliver less:

          Link Preview Image
          My turn: Public-private partnerships are an industry gimmick that don’t serve public well

          Don't waste public tax money. Caltrans public employees can do road projects more efficiently than private contractors without as many cost overruns.

          favicon

          CalMatters (calmatters.org)

          As Lynch writes, DOGE's purpose was to dismantle as much of the government as possible and shift its duties to Beltway Bandits who could milk Uncle Sucker for every dime.

          20/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          Mamdani's ambition, meanwhile, is to "restore faith in government [and] demonstrate that the public sector can match or even surpass the private sector in excellence."

          As Mamdani said in his inauguration speech, "For too long, we have turned to the private sector for greatness, while accepting mediocrity from those who serve the public."

          Turning governments into businesses has been an unmitigated failure.

          21/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            Mamdani's ambition, meanwhile, is to "restore faith in government [and] demonstrate that the public sector can match or even surpass the private sector in excellence."

            As Mamdani said in his inauguration speech, "For too long, we have turned to the private sector for greatness, while accepting mediocrity from those who serve the public."

            Turning governments into businesses has been an unmitigated failure.

            21/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.fr
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            After decades of outsourcing, the government hasn't managed to shrink its payroll, but government workers are today primarily employed in wheedling private contractors to fulfill their promises, even as public spending has quintupled:

            Link Preview Image
            Is government too big? Reflections on the size and composition of today’s federal government | Brookings

            Elaine Kamarck analyzes government failures and propose reforms to boost federal performance, accountability, and trust.

            favicon

            Brookings (www.brookings.edu)

            Instead of having a government employee do a government job, that govvie oversees a private contractor who costs twice as much...and sucks at their job:

            Attention Required! | Cloudflare

            favicon

            (www.pogo.org)

            22/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              After decades of outsourcing, the government hasn't managed to shrink its payroll, but government workers are today primarily employed in wheedling private contractors to fulfill their promises, even as public spending has quintupled:

              Link Preview Image
              Is government too big? Reflections on the size and composition of today’s federal government | Brookings

              Elaine Kamarck analyzes government failures and propose reforms to boost federal performance, accountability, and trust.

              favicon

              Brookings (www.brookings.edu)

              Instead of having a government employee do a government job, that govvie oversees a private contractor who costs twice as much...and sucks at their job:

              Attention Required! | Cloudflare

              favicon

              (www.pogo.org)

              22/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              There's a wonderful illustration of this principle at work in Snowden's memoir *Permanent Record*:

              Link Preview Image
              Permanent Record: Edward Snowden and the making of a whistleblower – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX

              favicon

              (memex.craphound.com)

              After Snowden broke his legs during special forces training and washed out, he went the NSA. After a couple years, his boss told him Congress capped the spy agencies' headcount but not their budgets, so he was going to have to quit his job and go to work for one of the NSA's many contractors, because the NSA could hire as many contractors as it wanted.

              23/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                There's a wonderful illustration of this principle at work in Snowden's memoir *Permanent Record*:

                Link Preview Image
                Permanent Record: Edward Snowden and the making of a whistleblower – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX

                favicon

                (memex.craphound.com)

                After Snowden broke his legs during special forces training and washed out, he went the NSA. After a couple years, his boss told him Congress capped the spy agencies' headcount but not their budgets, so he was going to have to quit his job and go to work for one of the NSA's many contractors, because the NSA could hire as many contractors as it wanted.

                23/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                So Snowden is sent to a recruiter who asks him how much he's making as a government spy. Snowden quotes a modest 5-figure sum. The recruiter is aghast and tells Snowden that he gets paid a percentage of whatever Snowden ends up making as a government contractor, and promptly triples Snowden's government salary. Why not? The spy agencies have unlimited budgets, and will pay whatever the private company that Snowden nominally works for bills them at. Everybody wins!

                24/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  So Snowden is sent to a recruiter who asks him how much he's making as a government spy. Snowden quotes a modest 5-figure sum. The recruiter is aghast and tells Snowden that he gets paid a percentage of whatever Snowden ends up making as a government contractor, and promptly triples Snowden's government salary. Why not? The spy agencies have unlimited budgets, and will pay whatever the private company that Snowden nominally works for bills them at. Everybody wins!

                  24/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  Ladies and gentlemen, the efficiency of government outsourcing. Run the government like a business!

                  As bad as this is when the government hires outside contractors to *do things*, it's even worse when they hire outside contractors to *consult on things*. Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Canadian government spent a fortune on consultants, especially at the start of the pandemic:

                  Link Preview Image
                  Pluralistic: Canada’s privatised shadow civil service (31 Jan 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                  favicon

                  (pluralistic.net)

                  25/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    Ladies and gentlemen, the efficiency of government outsourcing. Run the government like a business!

                    As bad as this is when the government hires outside contractors to *do things*, it's even worse when they hire outside contractors to *consult on things*. Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Canadian government spent a fortune on consultants, especially at the start of the pandemic:

                    Link Preview Image
                    Pluralistic: Canada’s privatised shadow civil service (31 Jan 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                    favicon

                    (pluralistic.net)

                    25/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    The main beneficiary of these contracts was McKinsey, who were given a blank cheque and no oversight - they were even exempted from rules requiring them to disclose conflicts of interest.

                    Trudeau raised Canadian government spending by 40%, to $11.8 billion, creating a "shadow civil service" that cost vastly more than the actual civil service - the government spent $1.85b on internal IT expertise, and $2.3b on outside contractors.

                    26/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      The main beneficiary of these contracts was McKinsey, who were given a blank cheque and no oversight - they were even exempted from rules requiring them to disclose conflicts of interest.

                      Trudeau raised Canadian government spending by 40%, to $11.8 billion, creating a "shadow civil service" that cost vastly more than the actual civil service - the government spent $1.85b on internal IT expertise, and $2.3b on outside contractors.

                      26/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      Contractors produced some of the worst IT boondoggles in government history, including the bungled "ArriveCAN" contact tracing program. The two-person shop that won the contract outsourced it to KPMG and raked off a 15-30% commission.

                      Before Trudeau, Harper paid IBM for Phoenix - a failed payroll system that was, amazingly, *far worse* than ArriveCAN. IBM got $309m to build Phoenix, and then Canada spent another $506m to fix it and compensate the people whose lives it ruined.

                      27/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        Contractors produced some of the worst IT boondoggles in government history, including the bungled "ArriveCAN" contact tracing program. The two-person shop that won the contract outsourced it to KPMG and raked off a 15-30% commission.

                        Before Trudeau, Harper paid IBM for Phoenix - a failed payroll system that was, amazingly, *far worse* than ArriveCAN. IBM got $309m to build Phoenix, and then Canada spent another $506m to fix it and compensate the people whose lives it ruined.

                        27/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Wherever you find these contractors, you find stupendous waste and fraud. I remember in the early 2000s, when Dan "City of Sound" Hill was working at the BBC and wanted to try an experiment to distribute MP3s of a radio programme.

                        The BBC - an organization with a long history of technical excellence - had given the exclusive contract for web delivery to Siemens, who wanted £10,000 to set up a web-server for the experiment.

                        28/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                          Wherever you find these contractors, you find stupendous waste and fraud. I remember in the early 2000s, when Dan "City of Sound" Hill was working at the BBC and wanted to try an experiment to distribute MP3s of a radio programme.

                          The BBC - an organization with a long history of technical excellence - had given the exclusive contract for web delivery to Siemens, who wanted £10,000 to set up a web-server for the experiment.

                          28/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          Dan bought rented a server from an online provider and put it all on his personal card, serving tens of thousands of MP3s for less than £10. It turns out that letting your technical personnel do your technology development costs 1/1000th of what it costs to have contractors do it.

                          Running your public institution "like a business" is incredibly *inefficient*.

                          29/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            Dan bought rented a server from an online provider and put it all on his personal card, serving tens of thousands of MP3s for less than £10. It turns out that letting your technical personnel do your technology development costs 1/1000th of what it costs to have contractors do it.

                            Running your public institution "like a business" is incredibly *inefficient*.

                            29/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.fr
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            Back when Musk and Ramaswamy announced their plan to cut $2t from the US federal budget, David Dayen published a plan to realize nearly that much savings just by attacking waste arising from running the government "like a business":

                            Link Preview Image
                            Pluralistic: It’s pretty easy to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget, actually (27 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                            favicon

                            (pluralistic.net)

                            The US government's own estimate of the losses due to contractor *fraud* comes out to $274b/year - roughly the size of the *entire civil service payroll*.

                            30/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                              Back when Musk and Ramaswamy announced their plan to cut $2t from the US federal budget, David Dayen published a plan to realize nearly that much savings just by attacking waste arising from running the government "like a business":

                              Link Preview Image
                              Pluralistic: It’s pretty easy to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget, actually (27 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                              favicon

                              (pluralistic.net)

                              The US government's own estimate of the losses due to contractor *fraud* comes out to $274b/year - roughly the size of the *entire civil service payroll*.

                              30/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.fr
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              (The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which Musk sadistically destroyed, accounts for 0.012% of federal spending.)

                              Medicare "upcoding" - a form of fraud committed by companies like United Healthcare, the largest Medicare Advantage provider in the country - costs the public $83b/year:

                              https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Mar24_ExecutiveSummary_MedPAC_Report_To_Congress_SEC.pdf

                              31/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                (The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which Musk sadistically destroyed, accounts for 0.012% of federal spending.)

                                Medicare "upcoding" - a form of fraud committed by companies like United Healthcare, the largest Medicare Advantage provider in the country - costs the public $83b/year:

                                https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Mar24_ExecutiveSummary_MedPAC_Report_To_Congress_SEC.pdf

                                31/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #32

                                Congress has banned Medicare and Medicaid from bargaining for pharma prices, which is why the US government pays 178% more than other governments, for the same drugs, which are often developed at public expense:

                                403 Forbidden

                                favicon

                                (aspe.hhs.gov)

                                The Pentagon is a cesspit of waste. It's not just firing spies and rehiring them as contractors at a 300% markup - that's just for starters. The Pentagon receives $840b/year and has failed its last three audits:

                                Access to this page has been denied

                                px-captcha

                                favicon

                                (thehill.com)

                                32/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                  Congress has banned Medicare and Medicaid from bargaining for pharma prices, which is why the US government pays 178% more than other governments, for the same drugs, which are often developed at public expense:

                                  403 Forbidden

                                  favicon

                                  (aspe.hhs.gov)

                                  The Pentagon is a cesspit of waste. It's not just firing spies and rehiring them as contractors at a 300% markup - that's just for starters. The Pentagon receives $840b/year and has failed its last three audits:

                                  Access to this page has been denied

                                  px-captcha

                                  favicon

                                  (thehill.com)

                                  32/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #33

                                  The conservative version of "efficiency" cashes out to "efficient at extracting value from public institutions, workers and customers." Mamdani's (good) mirror world "efficiency" means providing great public service through investing in public excellence.

                                  New York City is overdue for this kind of overhaul. Everywhere you look in the city, you find high price consultants making out like bandits and starving the city of the funds it needs to deliver.

                                  33/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                    The conservative version of "efficiency" cashes out to "efficient at extracting value from public institutions, workers and customers." Mamdani's (good) mirror world "efficiency" means providing great public service through investing in public excellence.

                                    New York City is overdue for this kind of overhaul. Everywhere you look in the city, you find high price consultants making out like bandits and starving the city of the funds it needs to deliver.

                                    33/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #34

                                    The Second Avenue subway spent more on consultants than it spent on digging tunnels:

                                    Just a moment...

                                    favicon

                                    (gothamist.com)

                                    Mamdani has pledged to audit the Department of Education's 25 largest contracts (the DOE spends $10b/year on outside contractors). He's rolling out "fiscal training and certification" for any government employee involved in procurement.

                                    34/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      The Second Avenue subway spent more on consultants than it spent on digging tunnels:

                                      Just a moment...

                                      favicon

                                      (gothamist.com)

                                      Mamdani has pledged to audit the Department of Education's 25 largest contracts (the DOE spends $10b/year on outside contractors). He's rolling out "fiscal training and certification" for any government employee involved in procurement.

                                      34/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #35

                                      Mamdani isn't pretending he can bridge the gap Adams left in city finances through efficiency alone: to make up the difference, he will tax NYC's millionaires, and ask the state to "rebalance" its relationship with NYC (NYC contributes 54.4% of the state budget, but only gets 40.5% in return).

                                      As Lynch writes, NYC was the birthplace of austerity-driven outsourcing, following from the city's bankruptcy in 1975. 50 years later, Mamdani is bringing that age to a close.

                                      35/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                        Mamdani isn't pretending he can bridge the gap Adams left in city finances through efficiency alone: to make up the difference, he will tax NYC's millionaires, and ask the state to "rebalance" its relationship with NYC (NYC contributes 54.4% of the state budget, but only gets 40.5% in return).

                                        As Lynch writes, NYC was the birthplace of austerity-driven outsourcing, following from the city's bankruptcy in 1975. 50 years later, Mamdani is bringing that age to a close.

                                        35/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #36

                                        Mamdani knows what the stakes are, too. He called efficiency "the most paramount left-wing concern, because it is either the fulfillment or the betrayal of that which motivates so much of our politics":

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        'What Speaks to Me About Abundance': My Full Interview With Zohran Mamdani

                                        The meteoric Democratic Socialist candidate and I talk about where we disagree about policy, where we agree about politics, and how to change our mind when we're wrong.

                                        favicon

                                        (www.derekthompson.org)

                                        Mamdani is reviving the tradition of "sewer socialism," a governing philosophy based on "bringing people into your politics by improving their lives in obvious ways":

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Digital Sewer Socialism

                                        With the rise of AI slop and overall “enshittification,” it is increasingly the case that the internet is failing to address the public’s needs. What we need is sewer socialism for the digital realm — and it can start at the municipal level.

                                        favicon

                                        (jacobin.com)

                                        36/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          Mamdani knows what the stakes are, too. He called efficiency "the most paramount left-wing concern, because it is either the fulfillment or the betrayal of that which motivates so much of our politics":

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          'What Speaks to Me About Abundance': My Full Interview With Zohran Mamdani

                                          The meteoric Democratic Socialist candidate and I talk about where we disagree about policy, where we agree about politics, and how to change our mind when we're wrong.

                                          favicon

                                          (www.derekthompson.org)

                                          Mamdani is reviving the tradition of "sewer socialism," a governing philosophy based on "bringing people into your politics by improving their lives in obvious ways":

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Digital Sewer Socialism

                                          With the rise of AI slop and overall “enshittification,” it is increasingly the case that the internet is failing to address the public’s needs. What we need is sewer socialism for the digital realm — and it can start at the municipal level.

                                          favicon

                                          (jacobin.com)

                                          36/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #37

                                          Sewer socialism, public excellence, real efficiency: these are the (good) mirror world versions of the right's obsession with "government efficiency." On the conservative side of the mirror, "efficiency" is an excuse for hamstringing government employees and turning their budgets over to lazy, crooked contractors.

                                          37/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups