Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Your regular reminder that "the rich" aren't people who earn large paychecks.

Your regular reminder that "the rich" aren't people who earn large paychecks.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 22 Posters 39 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social

    @clarity

    struggling with this one, maybe its a UK-US difference?

    The median salary in the UK is about £39k. That's $51k in US money.

    British members of parliament get £91k. That's $120k in US money.

    $400k is a fortune.

    and a food service worker with "a very sick parent with high healthcare costs or high childcare prices" will be in much more s**t than the surgeon.

    what am I missing?

    clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    clarity@xoxo.zone
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @charlesdelavalleepoussin per this article https://yourbrainonmoney.substack.com/p/i-make-good-money-why-do-i-still

    "41% of households earning $300K to $500K are living paycheck to paycheck."

    clarity@xoxo.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • clarity@xoxo.zoneC clarity@xoxo.zone

      @charlesdelavalleepoussin per this article https://yourbrainonmoney.substack.com/p/i-make-good-money-why-do-i-still

      "41% of households earning $300K to $500K are living paycheck to paycheck."

      clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
      clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
      clarity@xoxo.zone
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @charlesdelavalleepoussin an important thing here is that, in many of these high-earning industries, you will be pushed out of your career by complex social factors if you don't demonstrate that you "fit" the culture, and demonstrating that fit is -expensive-. It's an induced demand phenomenon: spend grows to meet available income and you'll be treated as a pity case (and denied promotions/opportunities) if you're leaving below those expected means.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ianrogers@mstdn.socialI ianrogers@mstdn.social

        @clarity If you're not an ownerr or management, you're a worker - but many who "earn high paychecks" sympathize with the management class and aspire to it. That's more of the issue. Of course we can get into the details of small business owners and entrepeneurs vs corporate C Level "workers" but it's the aspiration toward being on top of the shit heap and maintaining it so you might get your turn that causes class conflict even more than simple capitalism and rentseekeing etc themselves.

        clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
        clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
        clarity@xoxo.zone
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @ianrogers yeah class traitorship is very common among high-earners and is a serious problem that need addressing

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social

          @gbargoud @clarity

          The minimum salary in the UK is £22k for a full-time job. That's £29k.

          So a surgeon work's 13x as hard as a service worker on minimum wage?

          I see the point being made that workers are workers, but I think this is flawed. There's being paid for work and then there's being paid (wink wink) for work.

          The idea of ensuring the difference between the highest paid and lowest paid in any organisation must not be more than 5x is an excellent idea. I think the UK Greens might do it

          clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
          clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
          clarity@xoxo.zone
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @charlesdelavalleepoussin @gbargoud "So a surgeon work's 13x as hard as a service worker on minimum wage?" this is a misnomer. of course not. the salary gap is a deep injustice that needs fixing. but they both -work-. unlike someone who collects a nice sum just from the money sitting in their stocks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • clarity@xoxo.zoneC clarity@xoxo.zone

            Your regular reminder that "the rich" aren't people who earn large paychecks. They are people with capital that generates returns: investments, property, company shares. "High income earners" are not an intrinsic enemy of "the working class" – many of them are a member of it!

            unruly@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
            unruly@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
            unruly@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @clarity

            Is all we are saying that there are the rich in the eye of the beholden and then there are the filthy rich in the eye for the beheadin?

            clarity@xoxo.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • unruly@mastodon.socialU unruly@mastodon.social

              @clarity

              Is all we are saying that there are the rich in the eye of the beholden and then there are the filthy rich in the eye for the beheadin?

              clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
              clarity@xoxo.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
              clarity@xoxo.zone
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @unruly lmao yeah that works

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • clarity@xoxo.zoneC clarity@xoxo.zone

                Your regular reminder that "the rich" aren't people who earn large paychecks. They are people with capital that generates returns: investments, property, company shares. "High income earners" are not an intrinsic enemy of "the working class" – many of them are a member of it!

                sortius@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                sortius@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                sortius@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @clarity I dunno, "the rich" to me, living in poverty, is basically everyone

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • clarity@xoxo.zoneC clarity@xoxo.zone

                  Your regular reminder that "the rich" aren't people who earn large paychecks. They are people with capital that generates returns: investments, property, company shares. "High income earners" are not an intrinsic enemy of "the working class" – many of them are a member of it!

                  iakobsdesamos@xarxa.cloudI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iakobsdesamos@xarxa.cloudI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iakobsdesamos@xarxa.cloud
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @clarity you made me reconsider my beliefs about classes, thanks! It's a very interesting point of view and helps me feel better for having a higher income than many people I know. I already have a very strong feeling of belonging to the working class, but sometimes my privileged status makes me feel like I belong less? If that makes sense? Anyways, thanks again for sharing

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • clarity@xoxo.zoneC clarity@xoxo.zone

                    Your regular reminder that "the rich" aren't people who earn large paychecks. They are people with capital that generates returns: investments, property, company shares. "High income earners" are not an intrinsic enemy of "the working class" – many of them are a member of it!

                    grahamdowns@mastodon.africaG This user is from outside of this forum
                    grahamdowns@mastodon.africaG This user is from outside of this forum
                    grahamdowns@mastodon.africa
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @clarity Are you saying the converse IS true, though? That people with capital that generates returns are intrinsic enemies of "the working class"?

                    Meaning that someone who had the good fortune to have some spare money, and the good sense to invest it wisely, the the second good fortune to have those investments pay dividends, should be the enemy of the working class?

                    Or that if a member of the working class finds themselves in the fortunate position to have some spare cash lying around, they'd better not dare invest it into anything that's going to pay dividends, or they will automatically find themselves being the enemy of those they once called friends? 🤔

                    drajt@fosstodon.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • clarity@xoxo.zoneC clarity@xoxo.zone

                      a surgeon earning $400k with few investments living paycheck-to-paycheck (very possible if they have a sick parent with high healthcare costs or high childcare prices) has more in common with a food service worker than with Jeff Bezos, but the system is designed to make both workers forget that.

                      adritheonly@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      adritheonly@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      adritheonly@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @clarity Yes, quite, the whole reason for the innocent, yet in-your-face phrase "a gentleman of leisure".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • grahamdowns@mastodon.africaG grahamdowns@mastodon.africa

                        @clarity Are you saying the converse IS true, though? That people with capital that generates returns are intrinsic enemies of "the working class"?

                        Meaning that someone who had the good fortune to have some spare money, and the good sense to invest it wisely, the the second good fortune to have those investments pay dividends, should be the enemy of the working class?

                        Or that if a member of the working class finds themselves in the fortunate position to have some spare cash lying around, they'd better not dare invest it into anything that's going to pay dividends, or they will automatically find themselves being the enemy of those they once called friends? 🤔

                        drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                        drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                        drajt@fosstodon.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @GrahamDowns @clarity in some countries a significant proportion of shares are held by pension funds, made up of the pensions of millions of normal working people. In effect people own the companies that employ them. The problem is that pension funds never vote against the board so a tiny number of robber barons can milk the system without even owning most of it.

                        In civilised countries no one goes bankrupt because of illness, because of socialised health care.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups