Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

    Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

    They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

    Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

    "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

    I'm uninstalling my RING today.

    thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    thejacenallen@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @QasimRashid why would you even have one. The police state didnt just show up? Its been like this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • netraven@hear-me.socialN netraven@hear-me.social

      @QasimRashid I say sabotage against ring doorbells is 'OK' at this point since it could literally save lives.

      Edit: are the rest of the people who replied about you owning a ring or that they don't care, actually real? Did they read what you wrote? I don't think so.

      netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      netraven@hear-me.social
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @QasimRashid If nothing else, people should start a campaign of putting stickers over ring cams... kids like doing that kind of thing.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bontchev@infosec.exchangeB bontchev@infosec.exchange

        @QasimRashid You kept your RING while knowing that it was snitching to the police and decided to uninstall it only now, after you saw a stupid ad?

        admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
        admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
        admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @QasimRashid @bontchev They've been handing data to cops without much constraints for many years now so unfortunately most people who have one were already fine with that. That stuff has been in the national news periodically since early 2019. Amazon bought them in 2018. So pretty much if the device has Amazon branding you can be pretty confident that it was purchased after the whole thing was already known to be a poorly controlled government surveillance network.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • earl@mast.john1126.comE earl@mast.john1126.com

          @poleguy @QasimRashid

          Interesting take.... Today it could be used with facial recognition to look for illegal immigrants.

          Tomorrow is could be used to hunt for those that refuse to take the mark of the beast. (So they are also illegal.)

          If they had rolled out this technology a few years earlier, they could have used it to hunt for those who still had not taken their clot-shot. But they will get another chance for that with the next virus they release.

          poleguy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          poleguy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          poleguy@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          @Earl @QasimRashid

          I said that in jest. But in every joke is some element of truth.

          "Do not attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance."

          But maybe also don't attribute to ignorance what can be attributed to greed.

          I'm not in to conspiracy theories. So I'm not going to bite easily when I hear there is an unnamed "they" that's doing malicious virus releases.

          I'll stick to blaming ignorance first... then greed...

          This looks like greed. The data is very valuable... then abuse.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

            Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

            They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

            Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

            "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

            I'm uninstalling my RING today.

            yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
            yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
            yacc143@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @QasimRashid
            It's a way to say that they believe in innumeracy.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bontchev@infosec.exchangeB bontchev@infosec.exchange

              @QasimRashid You kept your RING while knowing that it was snitching to the police and decided to uninstall it only now, after you saw a stupid ad?

              newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
              newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
              newstik@social.heise.de
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @bontchev @QasimRashid That's like chiding someone because they quit smoking. Why did you even start!!!

              Not factually wrong, but not helpful.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                frantasaur@mastodon.ie
                wrote last edited by
                #27

                @QasimRashid Next feature for those white, middle class neighborhoods: search party, join neighbors across your community to lynch some poor bastard Karen thought was a bit “out of place”.

                (They already letting ICE use this footage 😡)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                  Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                  They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                  Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                  "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                  I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                  allpoints@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  allpoints@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  allpoints@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #28

                  @QasimRashid it was never about finding pets. It's about finding enemies of the state.

                  And for those who think this is overly harsh or paranoid, please take a moment to read up on fascism.

                  #USpol

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • n1xnx@tilde.zoneN n1xnx@tilde.zone

                    @QasimRashid
                    Way ahead of you there. I've never installed, nor would ever consider, a Ring, Alexa, Siri, or other spy device, especially one connected to an evil megacorporation.

                    frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                    frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                    frantasaur@mastodon.ie
                    wrote last edited by
                    #29

                    @n1xnx @QasimRashid I finally convinced my partner to switch off Siri. He jokingly shouted “hey Siri!” to prove it was off, and an old iPad he was using to track his darts score answered from across the room. Like, FFS!🤦🏻‍♀️

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • keithpjolley@discuss.systemsK keithpjolley@discuss.systems

                      @QasimRashid i did the same math in my head when i saw that ad. i bought a ring camera a long time ago simply wanting an easy way to look at my garden. didn't mean to join the dystopian surveillance state.

                      curious if people have a recommendation for an outdoor solar-powered non-dystopian camera?

                      mike@social.n1mtp.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mike@social.n1mtp.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mike@social.n1mtp.com
                      wrote last edited by
                      #30

                      @QasimRashid @keithpjolley Reolink has cameras that do not require a cloud connection.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                        Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                        They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                        Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                        "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                        I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                        kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kkarhan@infosec.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #31

                        @QasimRashid

                        I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                        Better late than never I guess...

                        Consider doing some #Camover in your hood to #UndoHarmCaused whilst at it...

                        #sarcasm #commentary #NotLegalAdvice

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups