Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

    Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

    They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

    Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

    "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

    I'm uninstalling my RING today.

    adx@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
    adx@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
    adx@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @QasimRashid It's was never about finding lost pets.

    Attention Required! | Cloudflare

    favicon

    (www.geekwire.com)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

      Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

      They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

      Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

      "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

      I'm uninstalling my RING today.

      tito_swineflu@sfba.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tito_swineflu@sfba.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tito_swineflu@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @QasimRashid I've had a number of crimes happen at my house that should have been captured by various types of online cameras. Without fail, the cameras capture 10 hours of cars passing and squirrels playing, but misses the precise 30 seconds when that guy is smashing in my front door. It's uncanny.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

        Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

        They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

        Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

        "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

        I'm uninstalling my RING today.

        keithpjolley@discuss.systemsK This user is from outside of this forum
        keithpjolley@discuss.systemsK This user is from outside of this forum
        keithpjolley@discuss.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @QasimRashid i did the same math in my head when i saw that ad. i bought a ring camera a long time ago simply wanting an easy way to look at my garden. didn't mean to join the dystopian surveillance state.

        curious if people have a recommendation for an outdoor solar-powered non-dystopian camera?

        netraven@hear-me.socialN mike@social.n1mtp.comM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

          Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

          They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

          Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

          "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

          I'm uninstalling my RING today.

          poleguy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          poleguy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          poleguy@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @QasimRashid And dog is just coded language that means Mexican, right?

          earl@mast.john1126.comE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

            Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

            They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

            Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

            "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

            I'm uninstalling my RING today.

            kacey@mspsocial.netK This user is from outside of this forum
            kacey@mspsocial.netK This user is from outside of this forum
            kacey@mspsocial.net
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @QasimRashid better late than never, I guess

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

              Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

              They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

              Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

              "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

              I'm uninstalling my RING today.

              yoshi@toot.communityY This user is from outside of this forum
              yoshi@toot.communityY This user is from outside of this forum
              yoshi@toot.community
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @QasimRashid Please and thank you. Uninstall that piece of surveillance crap. They pad their profits by selling data to ICEholes. IOW, you're paying ding-a-ring to spy on you. What a fucking racket.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                rememberusalways@newsie.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rememberusalways@newsie.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rememberusalways@newsie.social
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @QasimRashid

                Wow. Not a single racial comparison.

                Bravo. I'm boosting.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                  Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                  They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                  Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                  "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                  I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                  bontchev@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bontchev@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bontchev@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @QasimRashid You kept your RING while knowing that it was snitching to the police and decided to uninstall it only now, after you saw a stupid ad?

                  admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA newstik@social.heise.deN 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                    Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                    They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                    Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                    "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                    I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                    seda@someone.elses.computerS This user is from outside of this forum
                    seda@someone.elses.computerS This user is from outside of this forum
                    seda@someone.elses.computer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @QasimRashid we wrote about what is potentially behind this https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09994

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • poleguy@mastodon.socialP poleguy@mastodon.social

                      @QasimRashid And dog is just coded language that means Mexican, right?

                      earl@mast.john1126.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                      earl@mast.john1126.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                      earl@mast.john1126.com
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @poleguy @QasimRashid

                      Interesting take.... Today it could be used with facial recognition to look for illegal immigrants.

                      Tomorrow is could be used to hunt for those that refuse to take the mark of the beast. (So they are also illegal.)

                      If they had rolled out this technology a few years earlier, they could have used it to hunt for those who still had not taken their clot-shot. But they will get another chance for that with the next virus they release.

                      poleguy@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                        Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                        They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                        Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                        "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                        I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                        netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        netraven@hear-me.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @QasimRashid I say sabotage against ring doorbells is 'OK' at this point since it could literally save lives.

                        Edit: are the rest of the people who replied about you owning a ring or that they don't care, actually real? Did they read what you wrote? I don't think so.

                        netraven@hear-me.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • keithpjolley@discuss.systemsK keithpjolley@discuss.systems

                          @QasimRashid i did the same math in my head when i saw that ad. i bought a ring camera a long time ago simply wanting an easy way to look at my garden. didn't mean to join the dystopian surveillance state.

                          curious if people have a recommendation for an outdoor solar-powered non-dystopian camera?

                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          netraven@hear-me.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @keithpjolley @QasimRashid if it connects to "the cloud" it's not safe.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                            Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                            They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                            Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                            "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                            I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                            thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @QasimRashid why would you even have one. The police state didnt just show up? Its been like this.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • netraven@hear-me.socialN netraven@hear-me.social

                              @QasimRashid I say sabotage against ring doorbells is 'OK' at this point since it could literally save lives.

                              Edit: are the rest of the people who replied about you owning a ring or that they don't care, actually real? Did they read what you wrote? I don't think so.

                              netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              netraven@hear-me.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @QasimRashid If nothing else, people should start a campaign of putting stickers over ring cams... kids like doing that kind of thing.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • bontchev@infosec.exchangeB bontchev@infosec.exchange

                                @QasimRashid You kept your RING while knowing that it was snitching to the police and decided to uninstall it only now, after you saw a stupid ad?

                                admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                                admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                                admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @QasimRashid @bontchev They've been handing data to cops without much constraints for many years now so unfortunately most people who have one were already fine with that. That stuff has been in the national news periodically since early 2019. Amazon bought them in 2018. So pretty much if the device has Amazon branding you can be pretty confident that it was purchased after the whole thing was already known to be a poorly controlled government surveillance network.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • earl@mast.john1126.comE earl@mast.john1126.com

                                  @poleguy @QasimRashid

                                  Interesting take.... Today it could be used with facial recognition to look for illegal immigrants.

                                  Tomorrow is could be used to hunt for those that refuse to take the mark of the beast. (So they are also illegal.)

                                  If they had rolled out this technology a few years earlier, they could have used it to hunt for those who still had not taken their clot-shot. But they will get another chance for that with the next virus they release.

                                  poleguy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  poleguy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  poleguy@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @Earl @QasimRashid

                                  I said that in jest. But in every joke is some element of truth.

                                  "Do not attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance."

                                  But maybe also don't attribute to ignorance what can be attributed to greed.

                                  I'm not in to conspiracy theories. So I'm not going to bite easily when I hear there is an unnamed "they" that's doing malicious virus releases.

                                  I'll stick to blaming ignorance first... then greed...

                                  This looks like greed. The data is very valuable... then abuse.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                                    Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                                    They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                                    Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                                    "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                                    I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                                    yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                    yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                    yacc143@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @QasimRashid
                                    It's a way to say that they believe in innumeracy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • bontchev@infosec.exchangeB bontchev@infosec.exchange

                                      @QasimRashid You kept your RING while knowing that it was snitching to the police and decided to uninstall it only now, after you saw a stupid ad?

                                      newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      newstik@social.heise.de
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @bontchev @QasimRashid That's like chiding someone because they quit smoking. Why did you even start!!!

                                      Not factually wrong, but not helpful.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                                        Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                                        They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                                        Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                                        "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                                        I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                                        frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        frantasaur@mastodon.ie
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @QasimRashid Next feature for those white, middle class neighborhoods: search party, join neighbors across your community to lynch some poor bastard Karen thought was a bit “out of place”.

                                        (They already letting ICE use this footage 😡)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                                          Dystopia notwithstanding, Ring's commercial about using their surveillance to find lost pets makes no sense.

                                          They say 10M pets are lost per year & their service finds "more than 1 dog per day." So let's even say generously 500 dogs per year.

                                          Out of 10M lost pets, they want Americans to commit privacy suicide for a .005% success rate???

                                          "We fail 99.995% of the time! Let us violate your privacy!" is a helluva way to burn $10M in ads and destroy your brand.

                                          I'm uninstalling my RING today.

                                          allpoints@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          allpoints@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          allpoints@mstdn.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @QasimRashid it was never about finding pets. It's about finding enemies of the state.

                                          And for those who think this is overly harsh or paranoid, please take a moment to read up on fascism.

                                          #USpol

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups