Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations.

You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
scam
19 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
    galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
    galbinuscaeli@spacey.space
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @michael_w_busch @drahardja A kilo to orbit is a kilo to orbit. That kilo could be producing some watts of electricity or radiating somewhat less.
    In earth orbit a perfect solar panel could collect ~1.3kw per meter, a perfect radiator could emit ~.8kw/m

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

      You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations. This article does a good job of explaining why the *physics* of putting data centers in space is an enormous problem unlikely to be solved any time soon.

      #ai #scam

      Link Preview Image
      The Fractal Lab – SatNews

      favicon

      (news.satnews.com)

      drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      drahardja@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      Part two: https://news.satnews.com/2026/02/02/the-fractal-lab-part-ii/

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        drahardja@sfba.social
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @ckfinite Yes, I would ignore the useless infographic, which could be AI generated and simply repeats verbatim what’s in the text.

        But the text itself seems human-written, albeit…poorly edited.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

          You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations. This article does a good job of explaining why the *physics* of putting data centers in space is an enormous problem unlikely to be solved any time soon.

          #ai #scam

          Link Preview Image
          The Fractal Lab – SatNews

          favicon

          (news.satnews.com)

          mikeimback@disabled.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mikeimback@disabled.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mikeimback@disabled.social
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @drahardja How about we just stop believing EVERYTHING that rich people say for crying out loud...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
            mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
            mirth@mastodon.sdf.org
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @michael_w_busch @GalbinusCaeli @drahardja Those are 100W/kg? Falcon Heavy is already under $20/w for those panels, and Musk claims that Starship will bring cost much lower. The plans I've seen don't involve batteries, while cooling is a standout problem (the area is there in the shade of the panels, if you can figure out a space-compatible solution for moving coolant). It would be more expensive than claimed but I'm not convinced it's undoable.

            The important question IMO is: Should we?

            mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM mirth@mastodon.sdf.org

              @michael_w_busch @GalbinusCaeli @drahardja Those are 100W/kg? Falcon Heavy is already under $20/w for those panels, and Musk claims that Starship will bring cost much lower. The plans I've seen don't involve batteries, while cooling is a standout problem (the area is there in the shade of the panels, if you can figure out a space-compatible solution for moving coolant). It would be more expensive than claimed but I'm not convinced it's undoable.

              The important question IMO is: Should we?

              mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mirth@mastodon.sdf.org
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @michael_w_busch @GalbinusCaeli @drahardja (and in my opinion the answer is absolutely not, even if the engineering is workable and the financial case looks ok)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations. This article does a good job of explaining why the *physics* of putting data centers in space is an enormous problem unlikely to be solved any time soon.

                #ai #scam

                Link Preview Image
                The Fractal Lab – SatNews

                favicon

                (news.satnews.com)

                jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jeffgrigg@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @drahardja

                $1,200 to $2,500 per pound to put computers (or anything else) into space.

                > ouch <

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mirth@mastodon.sdf.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @michael_w_busch @GalbinusCaeli @drahardja Are you arguing that were it economically feasible it would be worth doing?

                  galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chad@mstdn.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @crouton @drahardja you mean this Thales?

                    Link Preview Image
                    'End of the line': City terminates Thales' troubled Metro Line LRT contract | CBC News

                    The company responsible for the Metro Line LRT's problem-riddled signalling system says the City of Edmonton has terminated its $55-million contract as of April 4.

                    favicon

                    CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                      You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations. This article does a good job of explaining why the *physics* of putting data centers in space is an enormous problem unlikely to be solved any time soon.

                      #ai #scam

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Fractal Lab – SatNews

                      favicon

                      (news.satnews.com)

                      the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                      the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                      the5thcolumnist@mstdn.ca
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @drahardja

                      I'll believe that after they get everyone's wi-fi to work.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                        You may already know that “data centers in space” is a cynical scam to tie AI funding to taxpayer-funded space operations. This article does a good job of explaining why the *physics* of putting data centers in space is an enormous problem unlikely to be solved any time soon.

                        #ai #scam

                        Link Preview Image
                        The Fractal Lab – SatNews

                        favicon

                        (news.satnews.com)

                        jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jfmezei@mstdn.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @drahardja Data Centre in space = Hyperloop scam.

                        But this time, with an easily purchasable government, Melon Husk may get his million satellite slots and spectrum which means that anyone wanting to launch a satellite will need to buy the slot and spectrum from him instead of getting it from government.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                          galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                          galbinuscaeli@spacey.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @mirth @drahardja @michael_w_busch 100% agreed.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mirth@mastodon.sdf.orgM mirth@mastodon.sdf.org

                            @michael_w_busch @GalbinusCaeli @drahardja Are you arguing that were it economically feasible it would be worth doing?

                            galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                            galbinuscaeli@spacey.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                            galbinuscaeli@spacey.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @michael_w_busch @drahardja @mirth Me? Absolutely not. It's somewhere between a dumb idea and a scam.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups