Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it.

#pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
pinephonelinuxmobilepermacomputing
7 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    bitspook@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. Gonna try Maemo Leste, quick searching around tells this is the lowest resource hungry #linuxmobile OS around. I am kinda gravitating toward #permacomputing these days, so it feels right

    bitspook@infosec.exchangeB frox@tooting.chF 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • bitspook@infosec.exchangeB bitspook@infosec.exchange

      #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. Gonna try Maemo Leste, quick searching around tells this is the lowest resource hungry #linuxmobile OS around. I am kinda gravitating toward #permacomputing these days, so it feels right

      bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
      bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
      bitspook@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Wow #maemoleste is smooth af on #pinephone ! UX is not "modern", but it is surprisingly good. I was expecting much worse. Animations never stutter, apps (default ones like settings, xterm, pdfreader etc) open reasonably fast, and it never goes above 500MB memory usage! I love it!

      This might be the perfect OS for me! But I am gonna give #lomiri a shot anyway.

      jackgandy@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bitspook@infosec.exchangeB bitspook@infosec.exchange

        Wow #maemoleste is smooth af on #pinephone ! UX is not "modern", but it is surprisingly good. I was expecting much worse. Animations never stutter, apps (default ones like settings, xterm, pdfreader etc) open reasonably fast, and it never goes above 500MB memory usage! I love it!

        This might be the perfect OS for me! But I am gonna give #lomiri a shot anyway.

        jackgandy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jackgandy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jackgandy@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @bitspook Yeah, the PinePhone still has potential if we focus on toolkits, applications, and environments that play well with it. If we can manage to optimize our software around this hardware, it should run very smoothly elsewhere.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bitspook@infosec.exchangeB bitspook@infosec.exchange

          #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. Gonna try Maemo Leste, quick searching around tells this is the lowest resource hungry #linuxmobile OS around. I am kinda gravitating toward #permacomputing these days, so it feels right

          frox@tooting.chF This user is from outside of this forum
          frox@tooting.chF This user is from outside of this forum
          frox@tooting.ch
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @bitspook was this with a full desktop environment like phosh ? Maybe something more lightweight like #sxmo would suit you

          bitspook@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • frox@tooting.chF frox@tooting.ch

            @bitspook was this with a full desktop environment like phosh ? Maybe something more lightweight like #sxmo would suit you

            bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bitspook@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @frox Yes, phosh on Debian and postmarketos. I did try sxmo very briefly when I was trying to catch em all but wanted something more touch focused. I didn't look into how it fared in resources consumption.

            frox@tooting.chF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bitspook@infosec.exchangeB bitspook@infosec.exchange

              @frox Yes, phosh on Debian and postmarketos. I did try sxmo very briefly when I was trying to catch em all but wanted something more touch focused. I didn't look into how it fared in resources consumption.

              frox@tooting.chF This user is from outside of this forum
              frox@tooting.chF This user is from outside of this forum
              frox@tooting.ch
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @bitspook it's likely less resource hungry than phosh, but also trickier to learn. There are several touch gestures to learn for interacting with it. It's not as user friendly as phosh, and has a bit of a learning phase.
              Then again, if what is lagging are large apps like Firefox, switching to a lighter DE like sxmo may not help.

              bitspook@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • frox@tooting.chF frox@tooting.ch

                @bitspook it's likely less resource hungry than phosh, but also trickier to learn. There are several touch gestures to learn for interacting with it. It's not as user friendly as phosh, and has a bit of a learning phase.
                Then again, if what is lagging are large apps like Firefox, switching to a lighter DE like sxmo may not help.

                bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                bitspook@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                bitspook@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @frox I flashed #sxmo it idles at almost half as much memory as #maemoleste, but for some reason feels laggy. e.g opening the "menu" or "keyboard" take half a second after the gesture. Not sure if this is a #pine thing or #sxmo thing. I love the concept though. I should've read the docs instead of assuming it to be some silly experiment and discarding after first look. I'll play around some more.

                Link Preview Image
                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups