<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[#pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/pinephone" rel="tag">#<span>pinephone</span></a> sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. Gonna try <a href="https://maemo-leste.github.io" rel="nofollow noopener">Maemo Leste</a>, quick searching around tells this is the lowest resource hungry <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/linuxmobile" rel="tag">#<span>linuxmobile</span></a> OS around. I am kinda gravitating toward <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/permacomputing" rel="tag">#<span>permacomputing</span></a> these days, so it feels right</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/29645a0d-bfe0-4fa6-97b5-d0f6eb517b68/pinephone-sucks-in-performance-since-my-wifi-replacement-will-hopefully-get-to-me-soon-i-am-gonna-invest-a-bit-more-in-it.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:14:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/29645a0d-bfe0-4fa6-97b5-d0f6eb517b68.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 12:19:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. on Mon, 25 May 2026 15:11:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/frox%40tooting.ch" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>frox</span></a></span> I flashed <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/sxmo" rel="tag">#<span>sxmo</span></a> it idles at almost half as much memory as <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/maemoleste" rel="tag">#<span>maemoleste</span></a>, but for some reason feels laggy. e.g opening the "menu" or "keyboard" take half a second after the gesture. Not sure if this is a <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/pine" rel="tag">#<span>pine</span></a> thing or <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/sxmo" rel="tag">#<span>sxmo</span></a> thing. I love the concept though. I should've read the docs instead of assuming it to be some silly experiment and discarding after first look. I'll play around some more.</p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/116/635/821/223/463/155/original/59d3966d3574afaf.png" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/bitspook/statuses/116635852423798200</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/bitspook/statuses/116635852423798200</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bitspook@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:11:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. on Sun, 24 May 2026 19:44:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/bitspook%40infosec.exchange">@<span>bitspook</span></a></span> it's likely less resource hungry than phosh, but also trickier to learn. There are several touch gestures to learn for interacting with it. It's not as user friendly as phosh, and has a bit of a learning phase.<br />Then again, if what is lagging are large apps like Firefox, switching to a lighter DE like sxmo may not help.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://tooting.ch/users/frox/statuses/116631266463747292</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://tooting.ch/users/frox/statuses/116631266463747292</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[frox@tooting.ch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 19:44:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. on Sun, 24 May 2026 17:27:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/frox%40tooting.ch" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>frox</span></a></span> Yes, phosh on Debian and postmarketos. I did try sxmo very briefly when I was trying to catch em all but wanted something more touch focused. I didn't look into how it fared in resources consumption.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/bitspook/statuses/116630727667241246</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/bitspook/statuses/116630727667241246</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bitspook@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 17:27:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. on Sun, 24 May 2026 16:50:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/bitspook%40infosec.exchange">@<span>bitspook</span></a></span> was this with a full desktop environment like phosh ? Maybe something more lightweight like <a href="https://tooting.ch/tags/sxmo" rel="tag">#<span>sxmo</span></a> would suit you</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://tooting.ch/users/frox/statuses/116630581847073023</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://tooting.ch/users/frox/statuses/116630581847073023</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[frox@tooting.ch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:50:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. on Sat, 23 May 2026 03:56:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/bitspook%40infosec.exchange">@<span>bitspook</span></a></span> Yeah, the PinePhone still has potential if we focus on toolkits, applications, and environments that play well with it. If we can manage to optimize our software around this hardware, it should run very smoothly elsewhere.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/jackgandy/statuses/116621876417813500</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/jackgandy/statuses/116621876417813500</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackgandy@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 03:56:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to #pinephone sucks in performance, since my wifi replacement will hopefully get to me soon, I am gonna invest a bit more in it. on Tue, 19 May 2026 14:41:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wow <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/maemoleste" rel="tag">#<span>maemoleste</span></a> is smooth af on <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/pinephone" rel="tag">#<span>pinephone</span></a> ! UX is not "modern", but it is surprisingly good. I was expecting much worse. Animations never stutter, apps (default ones like settings, xterm, pdfreader etc) open reasonably fast, and it <em>never</em> goes above 500MB memory usage! I love it!</p><p>This might be the perfect OS for me! But I am gonna give <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/lomiri" rel="tag">#<span>lomiri</span></a> a shot anyway.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/bitspook/statuses/116601762876219103</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/bitspook/statuses/116601762876219103</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bitspook@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 14:41:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>