Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'....
-
@eestileib @gimulnautti @ChrisMayLA6
> support of conservatives
Reactionary "conservatives" support he has. He got to the power with broader conservatives support, yes, but the cabal behind the aimed at conservatives propaganda is neither conservative nor christian – at least for someone who remembers and knows the real definienda of either.That said, for me and hopefully many others, the core of the contemporary _conservatism_ is not about calcification of the status quo but the careful consideration of changes that _must_ come. On that fundament, maga and trumpists hardly can fit even in the "reactionary" echelon – they are revolutionists. In practice, US conservatives were all conned by fasicst with their well researched firehose use of perverted words.
@ohir @eestileib @ChrisMayLA6 Let's also give ourselves the freedom to define conservatism. Like you're doing now. It is much more interesting than trying to argue which one of us right, eh?
-
@ChrisMayLA6 @ohir @gimulnautti
As the old saying goes, conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: that there should be an in-group whom the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group whom the law binds but does not protect. I suggest fascism is what happens when conservatives become confident enough to proceed without bothering to pretend there's still a meaningful rule of law.
@only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
> old saying goes [...]
How old this saying is?I specifically used "for me" qualifier, aware of the different meanings of the "conservative", especially considering how perverted this meaning became for the self-identified or purpoting to be conservatives' deeds of the past decades.
For me, the conservative thought is rooted in the Polish Constitution of year 1505:
"Whereas general laws and public acts pertain not to an individual but to the Nation at large, wherefore at this General Sejm held at Radom we have, together with all our kingdom's prelates, councils and land deputies, determined it to be fitting and just, and have so resolved, that henceforth for all time to come nothing new shall be resolved by us or our successors, without the common consent of the Senators and the Land Deputies, that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone, or that would tend to alter the general law and public liberty."...The key phrases "without the common consent", "that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone".
Evolution, not revolution. Consensus, not Dictat. As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most.
-
@only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
> old saying goes [...]
How old this saying is?I specifically used "for me" qualifier, aware of the different meanings of the "conservative", especially considering how perverted this meaning became for the self-identified or purpoting to be conservatives' deeds of the past decades.
For me, the conservative thought is rooted in the Polish Constitution of year 1505:
"Whereas general laws and public acts pertain not to an individual but to the Nation at large, wherefore at this General Sejm held at Radom we have, together with all our kingdom's prelates, councils and land deputies, determined it to be fitting and just, and have so resolved, that henceforth for all time to come nothing new shall be resolved by us or our successors, without the common consent of the Senators and the Land Deputies, that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone, or that would tend to alter the general law and public liberty."...The key phrases "without the common consent", "that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone".
Evolution, not revolution. Consensus, not Dictat. As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most.
@ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6
"As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most."That's a pretty emotional and value-laden statement, bypassing any burdens of proof. Wouldn't hold up in any court I would attend or support.
-
@only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
> old saying goes [...]
How old this saying is?I specifically used "for me" qualifier, aware of the different meanings of the "conservative", especially considering how perverted this meaning became for the self-identified or purpoting to be conservatives' deeds of the past decades.
For me, the conservative thought is rooted in the Polish Constitution of year 1505:
"Whereas general laws and public acts pertain not to an individual but to the Nation at large, wherefore at this General Sejm held at Radom we have, together with all our kingdom's prelates, councils and land deputies, determined it to be fitting and just, and have so resolved, that henceforth for all time to come nothing new shall be resolved by us or our successors, without the common consent of the Senators and the Land Deputies, that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone, or that would tend to alter the general law and public liberty."...The key phrases "without the common consent", "that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone".
Evolution, not revolution. Consensus, not Dictat. As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most.
@ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti You are of course free to make up your own meanings of words to your heart's content, but this does not mean it has anything to do with what words are commonly understood to mean. If you have your own private, non-standard definition, don't go about telling others "Please use quotation marks, please, please", as if your idiosyncratic meaning should be accepted by others. It should not, and will not.
-
@ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6
"As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most."That's a pretty emotional and value-laden statement, bypassing any burdens of proof. Wouldn't hold up in any court I would attend or support.
@gimulnautti @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6
> That's a pretty emotional and value-laden statementMay I ask for an example of a revolution that didn’t awaken reactionary demons?
And yes, Constitutions usually are value-laden.
-
@ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti You are of course free to make up your own meanings of words to your heart's content, but this does not mean it has anything to do with what words are commonly understood to mean. If you have your own private, non-standard definition, don't go about telling others "Please use quotation marks, please, please", as if your idiosyncratic meaning should be accepted by others. It should not, and will not.
@Pyrogenesis @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
> with what words are commonly understood to meanI pointed out in my first reply, that the very "common understanding" has had been perverted, by __fascists__.
And now I am being "corrected" by some of my dear interlocutors, implying the very perversion I spot.
There is nothing "conservative" in mafia grab of states, nor in __sudden__ trampling on laws and freedoms, nor in anything fascist do. The only valid point is, that self-identified conservatives really are and were enablers for populists.
conservative
CONSERVATIVE meaning: 1. not usually liking or trusting change, especially sudden change: 2. If you are conservative in…. Learn more.
(dictionary.cambridge.org)
-
Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'.... Given Iran is clearly under attack from US/Israeli forces, defending its airspace is not so much an escalation as a perfectly reasonable defensive response (and certainly legal as far as international law is concerned).
But the narrative remains, whatever the media may think its doing, one that privileges the US's positioning on the 'war'!
@ChrisMayLA6 Well, the US may contribute more revenue to just stay afloat as a media, let alone thrive.
And this metric may be the most difficult to overcome.
-
Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'.... Given Iran is clearly under attack from US/Israeli forces, defending its airspace is not so much an escalation as a perfectly reasonable defensive response (and certainly legal as far as international law is concerned).
But the narrative remains, whatever the media may think its doing, one that privileges the US's positioning on the 'war'!
Remember that Prophet David (Peace be upon him) defeated Goliath with just one stone from a slingshot.
-
Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'.... Given Iran is clearly under attack from US/Israeli forces, defending its airspace is not so much an escalation as a perfectly reasonable defensive response (and certainly legal as far as international law is concerned).
But the narrative remains, whatever the media may think its doing, one that privileges the US's positioning on the 'war'!
@ChrisMayLA6
Kinda like the girl that bit the orange microdick, and then trump beat her for defending herself from his attack. The MO of the USA since Vietnam. -
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
