Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'....

Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'....

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
iraninternationalla
29 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

    @gimulnautti @ChrisMayLA6
    > conservatism
    Fascism is not conservatism. Nor any other stolen word has suddenly changed meanings in the mind of the free man, because propagandist of supreme leader lies. Please use quotation marks, please, please.

    only_ohm@mas.toO This user is from outside of this forum
    only_ohm@mas.toO This user is from outside of this forum
    only_ohm@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    @ChrisMayLA6 @ohir @gimulnautti

    As the old saying goes, conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: that there should be an in-group whom the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group whom the law binds but does not protect. I suggest fascism is what happens when conservatives become confident enough to proceed without bothering to pretend there's still a meaningful rule of law.

    ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

      @eestileib @gimulnautti @ChrisMayLA6
      > support of conservatives
      Reactionary "conservatives" support he has. He got to the power with broader conservatives support, yes, but the cabal behind the aimed at conservatives propaganda is neither conservative nor christian – at least for someone who remembers and knows the real definienda of either.

      That said, for me and hopefully many others, the core of the contemporary _conservatism_ is not about calcification of the status quo but the careful consideration of changes that _must_ come. On that fundament, maga and trumpists hardly can fit even in the "reactionary" echelon – they are revolutionists. In practice, US conservatives were all conned by fasicst with their well researched firehose use of perverted words.

      gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
      gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
      gimulnautti@mastodon.green
      wrote last edited by
      #21

      @ohir @eestileib @ChrisMayLA6 Let's also give ourselves the freedom to define conservatism. Like you're doing now. It is much more interesting than trying to argue which one of us right, eh? 😉

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • only_ohm@mas.toO only_ohm@mas.to

        @ChrisMayLA6 @ohir @gimulnautti

        As the old saying goes, conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: that there should be an in-group whom the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group whom the law binds but does not protect. I suggest fascism is what happens when conservatives become confident enough to proceed without bothering to pretend there's still a meaningful rule of law.

        ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
        ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
        ohir@social.vivaldi.net
        wrote last edited by
        #22

        @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
        > old saying goes [...]
        How old this saying is?

        I specifically used "for me" qualifier, aware of the different meanings of the "conservative", especially considering how perverted this meaning became for the self-identified or purpoting to be conservatives' deeds of the past decades.

        For me, the conservative thought is rooted in the Polish Constitution of year 1505:
        "Whereas general laws and public acts pertain not to an individual but to the Nation at large, wherefore at this General Sejm held at Radom we have, together with all our kingdom's prelates, councils and land deputies, determined it to be fitting and just, and have so resolved, that henceforth for all time to come nothing new shall be resolved by us or our successors, without the common consent of the Senators and the Land Deputies, that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone, or that would tend to alter the general law and public liberty."...

        The key phrases "without the common consent", "that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone".

        Evolution, not revolution. Consensus, not Dictat. As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most.

        Link Preview Image
        gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG pyrogenesis@mefi.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

          @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
          > old saying goes [...]
          How old this saying is?

          I specifically used "for me" qualifier, aware of the different meanings of the "conservative", especially considering how perverted this meaning became for the self-identified or purpoting to be conservatives' deeds of the past decades.

          For me, the conservative thought is rooted in the Polish Constitution of year 1505:
          "Whereas general laws and public acts pertain not to an individual but to the Nation at large, wherefore at this General Sejm held at Radom we have, together with all our kingdom's prelates, councils and land deputies, determined it to be fitting and just, and have so resolved, that henceforth for all time to come nothing new shall be resolved by us or our successors, without the common consent of the Senators and the Land Deputies, that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone, or that would tend to alter the general law and public liberty."...

          The key phrases "without the common consent", "that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone".

          Evolution, not revolution. Consensus, not Dictat. As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most.

          Link Preview Image
          gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          gimulnautti@mastodon.green
          wrote last edited by
          #23

          @ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6
          "As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most."

          That's a pretty emotional and value-laden statement, bypassing any burdens of proof. Wouldn't hold up in any court I would attend or support.

          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

            @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
            > old saying goes [...]
            How old this saying is?

            I specifically used "for me" qualifier, aware of the different meanings of the "conservative", especially considering how perverted this meaning became for the self-identified or purpoting to be conservatives' deeds of the past decades.

            For me, the conservative thought is rooted in the Polish Constitution of year 1505:
            "Whereas general laws and public acts pertain not to an individual but to the Nation at large, wherefore at this General Sejm held at Radom we have, together with all our kingdom's prelates, councils and land deputies, determined it to be fitting and just, and have so resolved, that henceforth for all time to come nothing new shall be resolved by us or our successors, without the common consent of the Senators and the Land Deputies, that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone, or that would tend to alter the general law and public liberty."...

            The key phrases "without the common consent", "that shall be prejudicial or onerous to the our Republic or harmful and injurious to anyone".

            Evolution, not revolution. Consensus, not Dictat. As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most.

            Link Preview Image
            pyrogenesis@mefi.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            pyrogenesis@mefi.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            pyrogenesis@mefi.social
            wrote last edited by
            #24

            @ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti You are of course free to make up your own meanings of words to your heart's content, but this does not mean it has anything to do with what words are commonly understood to mean. If you have your own private, non-standard definition, don't go about telling others "Please use quotation marks, please, please", as if your idiosyncratic meaning should be accepted by others. It should not, and will not.

            ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG gimulnautti@mastodon.green

              @ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6
              "As our ancestors knew well that each revolution afflicts the state by awakening demons in those who fear the freedoms of others the most."

              That's a pretty emotional and value-laden statement, bypassing any burdens of proof. Wouldn't hold up in any court I would attend or support.

              ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
              ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
              ohir@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote last edited by
              #25

              @gimulnautti @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6
              > That's a pretty emotional and value-laden statement

              May I ask for an example of a revolution that didn’t awaken reactionary demons?

              And yes, Constitutions usually are value-laden.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pyrogenesis@mefi.socialP pyrogenesis@mefi.social

                @ohir @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti You are of course free to make up your own meanings of words to your heart's content, but this does not mean it has anything to do with what words are commonly understood to mean. If you have your own private, non-standard definition, don't go about telling others "Please use quotation marks, please, please", as if your idiosyncratic meaning should be accepted by others. It should not, and will not.

                ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                wrote last edited by
                #26

                @Pyrogenesis @only_ohm @ChrisMayLA6 @gimulnautti
                > with what words are commonly understood to mean

                I pointed out in my first reply, that the very "common understanding" has had been perverted, by __fascists__.

                And now I am being "corrected" by some of my dear interlocutors, implying the very perversion I spot.

                There is nothing "conservative" in mafia grab of states, nor in __sudden__ trampling on laws and freedoms, nor in anything fascist do. The only valid point is, that self-identified conservatives really are and were enablers for populists.

                Link Preview Image
                conservative

                CONSERVATIVE meaning: 1. not usually liking or trusting change, especially sudden change: 2. If you are conservative in…. Learn more.

                favicon

                (dictionary.cambridge.org)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                  Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'.... Given Iran is clearly under attack from US/Israeli forces, defending its airspace is not so much an escalation as a perfectly reasonable defensive response (and certainly legal as far as international law is concerned).

                  But the narrative remains, whatever the media may think its doing, one that privileges the US's positioning on the 'war'!

                  #Iran #InternationalLaw

                  cauzation@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cauzation@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cauzation@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #27

                  @ChrisMayLA6 Well, the US may contribute more revenue to just stay afloat as a media, let alone thrive.

                  And this metric may be the most difficult to overcome.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                    Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'.... Given Iran is clearly under attack from US/Israeli forces, defending its airspace is not so much an escalation as a perfectly reasonable defensive response (and certainly legal as far as international law is concerned).

                    But the narrative remains, whatever the media may think its doing, one that privileges the US's positioning on the 'war'!

                    #Iran #InternationalLaw

                    danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    danish_akhtar7@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #28

                    @ChrisMayLA6

                    Remember that Prophet David (Peace be upon him) defeated Goliath with just one stone from a slingshot.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                      Its interesting that Iran shooting down one (or possibly two) US aircraft in its airspace is being treated as an 'escalation'.... Given Iran is clearly under attack from US/Israeli forces, defending its airspace is not so much an escalation as a perfectly reasonable defensive response (and certainly legal as far as international law is concerned).

                      But the narrative remains, whatever the media may think its doing, one that privileges the US's positioning on the 'war'!

                      #Iran #InternationalLaw

                      nmba@mstdn.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nmba@mstdn.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nmba@mstdn.ca
                      wrote last edited by
                      #29

                      @ChrisMayLA6
                      Kinda like the girl that bit the orange microdick, and then trump beat her for defending herself from his attack. The MO of the USA since Vietnam.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups