Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
-
Well, yes, no. It is stupid to burn a resource like this, but the stupidity comes from building an economy in this case of global supply chain that exists by eating the planet. It’s built on destroying some other part of the world for the benefit of a tiny few people.
The other way to look at it is that it is a particular choice of economic pathway which temporarily can benefit people, but it is designed to consume the planet and people
@GhostOnTheHalfShell @chris @randahl We are of the same opinion.If humankind and all other life is seen as having a worth. You think twice (times 1000) about ruining it.
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
It's a shame tide power has been rather the laggard, as blockading the moon's gravity isn't much of a risk.
-
@randahl Also wind turbines don't sink/catch on fire and cause mass environmental damage
@CottonCandyandRazorblades @randahl they do very occasionally catch on fire, but whatevs!
-
-
@CurtAdams @randahl indeed
-
@lackattack @randahl ong can I boost this 100 times?
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl Wind, solar, hydro, batteries, tend to be a bit more spread out and usually provide a bit of redundancy because they are a bit more decentralised. Which is handy if another country starts blowing your stuff up.
-
@CottonCandyandRazorblades @randahl they do very occasionally catch on fire, but whatevs!
@DamonHD @CottonCandyandRazorblades @randahl
Wind turbines don’t cause massive environmental damage if and when they do catch fire. -
@DamonHD @CottonCandyandRazorblades @randahl
Wind turbines don’t cause massive environmental damage if and when they do catch fire.@KimSJ @CottonCandyandRazorblades @randahl indeed not! I am a big renewables fan.
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
X: The wind is not always blowing.
Me: The wind is always blowing somewhere.
X: Yes, but if we need the energy here then we need to transport this energy.
Me: So?
X: It is expensive to transport energy, it is inefficient, and it makes you dependent on the cooperation of other countries.
Me: And where is the oil from the gas station coming from?
X: Eh....
Me: And how much energy is used to transport all this oil?
X: Eh... -
Oil and natural gas provide feed stocks for much more than just diesel and petrol.
sour crude extracted in the region is a primary source of sulfur. sulfur is a feed stock for sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid is a chemical that’s used to extract and refine copper, nickel, cobalt, and lithium. Oil is an input to a lot of products.
Natural gas and sulfur are also feed stocks for fertilizer.
The global supply chain is the risk
@GhostOnTheHalfShell @randahl yes. “Non energy use” of oil is about 15% of the total 100 million barrels a day. It’s 12% of NG use. But the reason it is a global tool of blackmail and war is the other 85% which can be replaced by renewables and different ways of doing things.
Let’s stay focused on the main problem here. Which is the burning of fossil fuels.
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl@mastodon.social
If only there were energy storage technologies to take one day's excess-generation and make it available for days where there's a generation-shortfall. -
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl I don't think they "realized" it at all. They certainly experienced it, but I doubt they have made the connection at all.
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl but you can nuke Iran away and have the straight flushed. You can't nuke your turbines /Sarcasm
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl No. No they didn't.
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl I feel alternative energy is Europe’s path to energy independence.
But for wind, how are the dips in wind strength managed? I’ve always wondered.
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl good one
-
Those who keep complaining that wind turbines do not work when the winds are not blowing, just realized that oil does not work when the Hormuz Strait is not open.
@randahl And people who object to wealth taxes still want their investment properties protecting from cruise missiles.
-
@GhostOnTheHalfShell @randahl yes. “Non energy use” of oil is about 15% of the total 100 million barrels a day. It’s 12% of NG use. But the reason it is a global tool of blackmail and war is the other 85% which can be replaced by renewables and different ways of doing things.
Let’s stay focused on the main problem here. Which is the burning of fossil fuels.
If you don’t have feed stocks, eg sulfur or methane, you don’t have the global economy.
alternatives cost a lot more. After 20 or so iterations, 90% recycling you’re down to 10% of that resource.
We burn fossil fuels in order to destroy the planet. Swapping to renewables is still destroying the planet.
The different way of doing things is to re-localize economies and stop destroying the planet with a global economy
-
If you don’t have feed stocks, eg sulfur or methane, you don’t have the global economy.
alternatives cost a lot more. After 20 or so iterations, 90% recycling you’re down to 10% of that resource.
We burn fossil fuels in order to destroy the planet. Swapping to renewables is still destroying the planet.
The different way of doing things is to re-localize economies and stop destroying the planet with a global economy
