I asked ChatGPT if Roman Catholics follow Pope Leo.

[johntinker@hear-me.social]

@FranceskaMann
We see here that Pope Francis is in a superposition of states: He is dead, yet he is present.

[johntinker@hear-me.social]

@FranceskaMann
I have been playing with several of the chatbots, and now am using Lumo. I haven't used grok, but have heard a number of stories about its obvious manipulation.

[bici@mastodon.social]

@FranceskaMann

ChatGPT is going straight to hell.

[brinazarski@app.wafrn.net]

@FranceskaMann@freeradical.zone

[machias@mstdn.social]

@FranceskaMann I hate Sam Altman

[trumpresistance@newsie.social]

@FranceskaMann I hope you told it to pound sand.

[axomamma@mastodon.online]

@FranceskaMann It didn't argue, it doesn't think. It is designed by humans to make them money. That it is fucking up everything is - to the people bankrolling it - a small inconvenience for which they won't pay a price. Being surprised its output is garbage is silly at this point.

[freshstart@hachyderm.io]

@FranceskaMann it is like asking "is the Pope even Catholic"?

[barefootliam@floss.social]

@FranceskaMann Google Gemini gave me instructions on getting to a non-existent European castle yesterday, told me it was a ruin people liked to explore, and said sources conflict on the age of it.

[ukeleleeric@mstdn.social]

@Axomamma @FranceskaMann what amazes me is that, even when you explain to someone what LLMs do (basically, statistically-biased random word jumbler), they still insist on using it. Asides from every other reason for not using it, they don't realise that it doesn't 'get things right', 'think', 'argue', 'hallucinate', 'reconsider', it just comes up with a response that statistically would be what a human would come up with next.

[nicholas@aklp.club]

it just comes up with a response that statistically would be what a human would come up with next prolong engagement.

[eurospoofer@mastodon.social]

@FranceskaMann

chat je pète:
If you tell your cat to fart, don't be surprised if the answer smells.