Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
retrocomputingvintagecomputinmicrocodereverseengineer
82 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

    There is a way to extract the contents of an implant ROM. The doping that creates the gates means that you can etch the silicon in a way that the doped areas will stand out.

    The acids involved in this process are some of the nastiest chemicals on the planet. Stuff like hydrofluoric acid.

    Link Preview Image
    Hydrofluoric acid - Wikipedia

    favicon

    (en.wikipedia.org)

    Oh, you spilled it on yourself? no big deal. It's just going to dissolve your bones.

    infosecdj@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
    infosecdj@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
    infosecdj@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #28

    @gloriouscow At least HF is not illegal to own, haha! For now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

      The next best bet is that there is some sort of trigger that will cause the chip to dump its microcode out on its address pins. @kenshirriff found that it should be possible to convince an 8087 to do so - something I still need to verify now that FPGAs no longer scare me.

      This logic may only be found in bondout versions of the 286. Who knows. It would take someone staring at the high resolution 286 photos for hundreds of hours to determine if such a mechanism even exists.

      If you're up for it:

      Just a moment...

      favicon

      (siliconprawn.org)

      ask@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
      ask@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
      ask@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #29

      @gloriouscow @kenshirriff is it not possible for the silicon to be probed directly after it's opened up for die photos? Like attach probe wires with a wire bonding machine. Maybe the microcode section could be cut out from the rest of the die if the rest interferes with the signals.

      gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ask@infosec.exchangeA ask@infosec.exchange

        @gloriouscow @kenshirriff is it not possible for the silicon to be probed directly after it's opened up for die photos? Like attach probe wires with a wire bonding machine. Maybe the microcode section could be cut out from the rest of the die if the rest interferes with the signals.

        gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
        gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
        gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
        wrote last edited by
        #30

        @ask @kenshirriff

        Like, theoretically possible with modern technology in a laboratory environment? Yes.

        Doable by a hobbyist in their garage? Not so much.

        The tiny little gold wires used to bond the die to the package legs look like the trunks of redwood trees at full magnification. The only place to reasonably attach a wire is on one of the pads that were constructed for them.

        Link Preview Image
        gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

          @ask @kenshirriff

          Like, theoretically possible with modern technology in a laboratory environment? Yes.

          Doable by a hobbyist in their garage? Not so much.

          The tiny little gold wires used to bond the die to the package legs look like the trunks of redwood trees at full magnification. The only place to reasonably attach a wire is on one of the pads that were constructed for them.

          Link Preview Image
          gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
          gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
          gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
          wrote last edited by
          #31

          @ask Further complicating matters is that once you've decapped a chip like this unless you have some sort of professional-grade clean-room filtration setup you've pretty much destroyed it because of all the microscopic schmutz floating in your average air that will get in and start bridging microscopic traces everywhere.

          azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

            @thomasfuchs The same CNN process was used to extract the multi-level microcode for the 8087 - the process of decoding that is still on-going.

            That chip is insane and @kenshirriff is about our only hope for ever decoding how it works. It has microcode, but there is far less separation between discrete logic and the microcode engine than on conventional CPUs. It's like the roots have grown into all the plumbing, and requites laborious circuit-tracing to understand what the much of the microcode even does.

            You can see the extracted 8087 microcode here. No mistakes were ever found or reported:

            oh, i actually see someone's opened two issues. i must have missed the email lol

            Microcode Deep-Zoom Viewer

            favicon

            (8087.martypc.net)

            bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
            bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
            bitcrush_io@oldbytes.space
            wrote last edited by
            #32

            @gloriouscow
            All of this is so cool and I'm awed by the amount of effort put in. Thank you!
            @thomasfuchs @kenshirriff

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
            • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

              One of my early experiments in OpenCV produced an unintentional piece of Microcode Art I'm still fond of.

              This was a result of attempting auto-segmentation using incrementing hue on the various segments. Needless to say, a lovely disaster.

              bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
              bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
              bitcrush_io@oldbytes.space
              wrote last edited by
              #33

              @gloriouscow
              Is there an uncompressed version of this file you'd be willing to share? It really is beautiful and I'm wondering how it would look printed out and framed.

              gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

                It was an group effort by a bunch of talented people to extract and correct the physical bits, but the major work of decoding them was done by reenigne - you may know him from such incredible PC demos as 8088 MPH and Area 5150, as well as being the person who decoded the 8088 microcode previously.

                Please, check out his writeup.

                Link Preview Image
                80386 microcode disassembled « Reenigne blog

                favicon

                (www.reenigne.org)

                #retrocomputing #vintagecomputing #microcode #reverseengineering

                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                wrote last edited by
                #34

                Here's a little bit of banana for scale to appreciate how tiny the features we're working with are.

                I have this acrylic keychain that has an actual 386 die in it.

                It's Today's Choice, you see. (The rear side has a 486 die, with "Tomorrows Vision" labelled above it, something that I will never get tired of reading. Oh my god, I'm so old.)

                Link Preview Image
                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG whimsy@chitter.xyzW lunarloony@dosgame.clubL magnetic_tape@infosec.exchangeM 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                  Here's a little bit of banana for scale to appreciate how tiny the features we're working with are.

                  I have this acrylic keychain that has an actual 386 die in it.

                  It's Today's Choice, you see. (The rear side has a 486 die, with "Tomorrows Vision" labelled above it, something that I will never get tired of reading. Oh my god, I'm so old.)

                  Link Preview Image
                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #35

                  See the tiny little darker-color square on the lower left? That's the microcode array, all 94,720 bits of it.

                  Link Preview Image
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB bitcrush_io@oldbytes.space

                    @gloriouscow
                    Is there an uncompressed version of this file you'd be willing to share? It really is beautiful and I'm wondering how it would look printed out and framed.

                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                    wrote last edited by
                    #36

                    @bitcrush_io Sadly I don't. I was rapidly filling up my hard drive with hundreds of very large images being generated from the over 50 different python scripts I wrote over the course of bit extraction and the original full resolution version got accidentally deleted in a clean-up 😞

                    I likely have the original script that made it, and I might be able to reproduce it if I can determine the original parameters that I used, but it will take some fiddling. I was running scripts on some post-processed versions of the input image as well so there's really no telling if I'll find the right combination. Bummer.

                    bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                      I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

                      It was an group effort by a bunch of talented people to extract and correct the physical bits, but the major work of decoding them was done by reenigne - you may know him from such incredible PC demos as 8088 MPH and Area 5150, as well as being the person who decoded the 8088 microcode previously.

                      Please, check out his writeup.

                      Link Preview Image
                      80386 microcode disassembled « Reenigne blog

                      favicon

                      (www.reenigne.org)

                      #retrocomputing #vintagecomputing #microcode #reverseengineering

                      linear@nya.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      linear@nya.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      linear@nya.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #37
                      @gloriouscow@oldbytes.space how long until the 486? that's the one i am most interested in 🙂

                      (only half joking...)
                      magnetic_tape@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                        @bitcrush_io Sadly I don't. I was rapidly filling up my hard drive with hundreds of very large images being generated from the over 50 different python scripts I wrote over the course of bit extraction and the original full resolution version got accidentally deleted in a clean-up 😞

                        I likely have the original script that made it, and I might be able to reproduce it if I can determine the original parameters that I used, but it will take some fiddling. I was running scripts on some post-processed versions of the input image as well so there's really no telling if I'll find the right combination. Bummer.

                        bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bitcrush_io@oldbytes.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #38

                        @gloriouscow
                        Totally understandable, and certainly no need to do all that on my account. If you did find the script, I imagine there's all kinds of variations on this idea that would look fantastic without needing to recreate this image exactly.

                        gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • bitcrush_io@oldbytes.spaceB bitcrush_io@oldbytes.space

                          @gloriouscow
                          Totally understandable, and certainly no need to do all that on my account. If you did find the script, I imagine there's all kinds of variations on this idea that would look fantastic without needing to recreate this image exactly.

                          gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #39

                          @bitcrush_io That is true. I think a version without the black might look better.

                          I think the complete lack of intention behind it is something magical though.

                          gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                            I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

                            It was an group effort by a bunch of talented people to extract and correct the physical bits, but the major work of decoding them was done by reenigne - you may know him from such incredible PC demos as 8088 MPH and Area 5150, as well as being the person who decoded the 8088 microcode previously.

                            Please, check out his writeup.

                            Link Preview Image
                            80386 microcode disassembled « Reenigne blog

                            favicon

                            (www.reenigne.org)

                            #retrocomputing #vintagecomputing #microcode #reverseengineering

                            rk@mastodon.well.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rk@mastodon.well.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rk@mastodon.well.com
                            wrote last edited by
                            #40

                            @gloriouscow

                            Goddamn incredible

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                              Here's a little bit of banana for scale to appreciate how tiny the features we're working with are.

                              I have this acrylic keychain that has an actual 386 die in it.

                              It's Today's Choice, you see. (The rear side has a 486 die, with "Tomorrows Vision" labelled above it, something that I will never get tired of reading. Oh my god, I'm so old.)

                              Link Preview Image
                              whimsy@chitter.xyzW This user is from outside of this forum
                              whimsy@chitter.xyzW This user is from outside of this forum
                              whimsy@chitter.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #41

                              @gloriouscow I have to assume those dies must have failed QA because otherwise those must have been really expensive keychains.

                              gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • whimsy@chitter.xyzW whimsy@chitter.xyz

                                @gloriouscow I have to assume those dies must have failed QA because otherwise those must have been really expensive keychains.

                                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                                wrote last edited by
                                #42

                                @whimsy I would assume so.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                                  I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

                                  It was an group effort by a bunch of talented people to extract and correct the physical bits, but the major work of decoding them was done by reenigne - you may know him from such incredible PC demos as 8088 MPH and Area 5150, as well as being the person who decoded the 8088 microcode previously.

                                  Please, check out his writeup.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  80386 microcode disassembled « Reenigne blog

                                  favicon

                                  (www.reenigne.org)

                                  #retrocomputing #vintagecomputing #microcode #reverseengineering

                                  paulehoffman@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paulehoffman@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paulehoffman@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #43

                                  @gloriouscow I just wanna say as an Old Skool nerd, this is absolutely amazing. As John and Hank Green would say, this is definitely committing to the bit. Bravo!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                                    @bitcrush_io That is true. I think a version without the black might look better.

                                    I think the complete lack of intention behind it is something magical though.

                                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #44

                                    @bitcrush_io so, good news! I've been able to recover this particular disaster workflow.

                                    I'm not sure the exact parameters so an exact recreation may not be possible, but I was able to produce these. Which one do you like best? (the upper-left one is the original, for comparison).

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                                      Here's a little bit of banana for scale to appreciate how tiny the features we're working with are.

                                      I have this acrylic keychain that has an actual 386 die in it.

                                      It's Today's Choice, you see. (The rear side has a 486 die, with "Tomorrows Vision" labelled above it, something that I will never get tired of reading. Oh my god, I'm so old.)

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      lunarloony@dosgame.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lunarloony@dosgame.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lunarloony@dosgame.club
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #45

                                      @gloriouscow This weirdly reminds me of those plastic trinkets you used to get that contained """real""" moon dust

                                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • lunarloony@dosgame.clubL lunarloony@dosgame.club

                                        @gloriouscow This weirdly reminds me of those plastic trinkets you used to get that contained """real""" moon dust

                                        gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #46

                                        @lunarloony there's actually a shit ton of moon dust out there, they brought back 842 pounds rock and soil over all the Apollo missions

                                        I'm not sure I'd be confident about any random keychain, but its not infeasible. It's fun reading about how many moon rocks were stolen or lost, too.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Here’s All the Rocks We Hauled Back From the Moon

                                        The 12 human beings who walked on the Moon collected, catalogued and returned 842 pounds of lunar rock and soil. Each sample has been meticulously documented in NASA's Lunar Sample Catalog.

                                        favicon

                                        Beautiful Public Data (www.beautifulpublicdata.com)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                                          I'm incredibly pleased to announce that the microcode for the Intel 80386 has been decoded.

                                          It was an group effort by a bunch of talented people to extract and correct the physical bits, but the major work of decoding them was done by reenigne - you may know him from such incredible PC demos as 8088 MPH and Area 5150, as well as being the person who decoded the 8088 microcode previously.

                                          Please, check out his writeup.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          80386 microcode disassembled « Reenigne blog

                                          favicon

                                          (www.reenigne.org)

                                          #retrocomputing #vintagecomputing #microcode #reverseengineering

                                          cgervasi@fosstodon.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cgervasi@fosstodon.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cgervasi@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #47

                                          @gloriouscow I was so excited to get a machine with a 386 + math coprocessor when I was 16 y/o. I didn't yet know there was microcode fetching, decoding, and executing the instructions.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups