Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber?

Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
mastodon
356 Posts 173 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • carnage4life@mas.toC carnage4life@mas.to

    @evan @scottjenson @MozillaAI Mastodon as a community is quite hostile to AI and anything that isn’t a criticism of AI is viewed with skepticism at best and typically with hostility as the default.

    It’s unfortunate because, as in your Mozilla example, there is still time to shape how AI is used in our industry. It’s better to engage and try to influence it versus stick your head in the sand and have the change thrusted upon you.

    diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
    diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
    diogoconstantino@masto.pt
    wrote last edited by
    #166

    @carnage4life Hi! I hope you don't feel discouraged by assholes.

    Loving, hating AI and everything in between is ok. Even caring and not caring about AI.

    About engaging with AI. Being AI something great, or whatever, keep in mind that AI is being shoved into people's throats, both on their loved tech, and on every f*in public conversation regardless of what they think or feel about it. So harsh reactions are to be expected, and some will also be unacceptable.

    @evan @scottjenson @MozillaAI

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

      @carnage4life @evan Strongly agree. The current AI companies have done much to be criticized but the tech itself, especially the open source and local versions (which this community should love) is actually a positive force here. We need to have discussions to understand the differences.

      diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
      diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
      diogoconstantino@masto.pt
      wrote last edited by
      #167

      @scottjenson I think nobody has to love any tech, and expecting that is expecting to jump over an impossible bar. That being said, nobody should be disrespectful towards another, and that's just basic decency.

      @carnage4life @evan

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

        @Gargron That is a personal choice and one which I totally respect. But I do think Mastodon should be big enough, and open enough, to allow an "AI community" to form, even thrive.

        Too many people in my replies don't seem to agree with that.

        remove_huilo@mas.toR This user is from outside of this forum
        remove_huilo@mas.toR This user is from outside of this forum
        remove_huilo@mas.to
        wrote last edited by
        #168

        @scottjenson @Gargron we need neither neo-nazi instances nor Ai culture.

        davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

          @wlach I'm sorry to hear that.

          wlach@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
          wlach@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
          wlach@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #169

          @evan Thanks for being a voice of reason in these discussions all the same. I have some hope that we'll be able to talk about these things in a more reasonable way a few years out

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

            Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

            I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

            Link Preview Image
            isagalaev@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            isagalaev@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            isagalaev@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #170

            @scottjenson @carnage4life I'm astonished you're trying to make generalizations based on basically one data point. Sure, the followers numbers are statistically meaningful, but these are all people following one specific person. It's not representative of any one network.

            As a counter-example, my corner of Mastodon is *very* political. Nothing lukewarm about it.

            corbden@defcon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest

              @dgodon your argument is, i guess, that there are no members of marginalized communities who are "AI users"? or is it that it doesn't matter because your being against AI and their using AI is more important than anything else about who they are?

              dgodon@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
              dgodon@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
              dgodon@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #171

              @toddsundsted Not following your inferences.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest

                @dgodon @scottjenson @Gargron consider though that there are people in marginalized communities who are also "AI people". are they not welcome? is anti-AI (or anti-whatever) more important than welcoming marginalized people? literally, where is the line?

                dgodon@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
                dgodon@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
                dgodon@mastodon.online
                wrote last edited by
                #172

                @toddsundsted @scottjenson @Gargron "AI people" is a very vague group. Quite a bit of AI discussion is hype and mis/dis-info and I don't think needs to be coddled here (just as we shouldn't tolerate puppy killers or fascists, even if they're from marginalized groups). Tho there are many shades of gray and I think it's also fair to say some AI discussion is non-hype/mis/dis-info. But my main point is that welcoming marginalized groups should be the focus, not opinions about AI

                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                  As this conversation is spiraling a bit I want to make a few things clear:
                  1. I'd like Mastodon to be MORE inclusive and bring in more voices
                  2. Some people don't seem to want that
                  3. This is core problem to solve: How do we let more in, but not "pollute" your feed?
                  4. The solution is NOT "gatekeeping", revelling in the fact that AI journalists aren't welcome
                  5. This is the same reason we lost "Black Twitter" when it came over in 2022

                  Yes, a lot of you don't want AI posts in your feed (or pick any other topic) but the solution isn't to keep "AI People" from joining Mastodon, any more than it is keeping marginalized communities off of Mastodon.

                  spazcosoft@peoplemaking.gamesS This user is from outside of this forum
                  spazcosoft@peoplemaking.gamesS This user is from outside of this forum
                  spazcosoft@peoplemaking.games
                  wrote last edited by
                  #173

                  @scottjenson 🖕

                  scottjenson@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest

                    @dgodon your argument is, i guess, that there are no members of marginalized communities who are "AI users"? or is it that it doesn't matter because your being against AI and their using AI is more important than anything else about who they are?

                    aura@sunny.gardenA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aura@sunny.gardenA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aura@sunny.garden
                    wrote last edited by
                    #174

                    @toddsundsted @dgodon This is not a coherent argument. I'm white and I'm trans. My being trans does not impart being marginalised on all while people.

                    AI users are not a marginalised community. That some members of that community may also be of marginalised groups does not change that.

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                      @Gargron That is a personal choice and one which I totally respect. But I do think Mastodon should be big enough, and open enough, to allow an "AI community" to form, even thrive.

                      Too many people in my replies don't seem to agree with that.

                      jkmcnk@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jkmcnk@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jkmcnk@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #175

                      @scottjenson @Gargron it is. no one preventing anyone from running their own "ai friendly" servers, participating in being shunned by everyone with half a clue. 🤷

                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gargron@mastodon.socialG gargron@mastodon.social

                        @scottjenson I’m not interested in following any “AI people”. That doesn’t make it an echo chamber. We don’t need equal amounts of people who love puppies and want to kill puppies, not everything needs to be equally represented.

                        cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cap_ybarra@beige.party
                        wrote last edited by
                        #176

                        @Gargron @scottjenson thanks for comin to get your boi @gargron

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                          As this conversation is spiraling a bit I want to make a few things clear:
                          1. I'd like Mastodon to be MORE inclusive and bring in more voices
                          2. Some people don't seem to want that
                          3. This is core problem to solve: How do we let more in, but not "pollute" your feed?
                          4. The solution is NOT "gatekeeping", revelling in the fact that AI journalists aren't welcome
                          5. This is the same reason we lost "Black Twitter" when it came over in 2022

                          Yes, a lot of you don't want AI posts in your feed (or pick any other topic) but the solution isn't to keep "AI People" from joining Mastodon, any more than it is keeping marginalized communities off of Mastodon.

                          cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cap_ybarra@beige.party
                          wrote last edited by
                          #177

                          @scottjenson you are complaining about us not loving social media snake oil salesmen here? that's a feature not a bug

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                            As this conversation is spiraling a bit I want to make a few things clear:
                            1. I'd like Mastodon to be MORE inclusive and bring in more voices
                            2. Some people don't seem to want that
                            3. This is core problem to solve: How do we let more in, but not "pollute" your feed?
                            4. The solution is NOT "gatekeeping", revelling in the fact that AI journalists aren't welcome
                            5. This is the same reason we lost "Black Twitter" when it came over in 2022

                            Yes, a lot of you don't want AI posts in your feed (or pick any other topic) but the solution isn't to keep "AI People" from joining Mastodon, any more than it is keeping marginalized communities off of Mastodon.

                            lowtech@tldr.nettime.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lowtech@tldr.nettime.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lowtech@tldr.nettime.org
                            wrote last edited by
                            #178

                            @scottjenson I wonder if the days of online social media of any kind may be drawing to a close. The notions that these spaces provide a form of authentic community, or impart a meaningful sense of solidarity, are being revealed as illusions. And that may be no bad thing.

                            scottjenson@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • aurimas@androiddev.socialA aurimas@androiddev.social

                              @fabrice hence the need for precise terms

                              fabrice@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fabrice@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fabrice@fosstodon.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #179

                              @Aurimas well guess who's always forgetting the training costs?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • feloniouspunk@beige.partyF feloniouspunk@beige.party

                                @scottjenson @Gargron There is nothing, absolutely nothing, stopping anyone from creating and cultivating an AI community on Mastodon. Start a server. Knock yourself out.

                                But expecting to *farm acceptance* from a group of people, one which most members vastly dislike AI, is quite the hubris.

                                But sure, the community at large is the problem.

                                Clean up your kitchen and maybe folks will join you for a meal.

                                thejen@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thejen@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thejen@beige.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #180

                                @FeloniousPunk @scottjenson @Gargron Adopting an attitude of persecution as primarily white dude tech bros akin to the abusive experience of Black Twitter on Fedi is...a choice.

                                Crying that no one wants to play with you because the entire industry is abusive AF and literally nobody in the wider fediverse wants it forced on us is HILARIOUS.

                                Go away, weirdo.

                                charlotteeowyn@chaosfem.twC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • aura@sunny.gardenA aura@sunny.garden

                                  @toddsundsted @dgodon This is not a coherent argument. I'm white and I'm trans. My being trans does not impart being marginalised on all while people.

                                  AI users are not a marginalised community. That some members of that community may also be of marginalised groups does not change that.

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #181

                                  @aura i don't understand where being white factors in.

                                  to be completely clear about the point i'm making, the group of "AI users" as of April 2026 is broad and currently includes people of color, disadvantaged, and other traditionally marginalized people. i know this because i work with them.

                                  in the context of this thread, what i'm wondering is whether the people who would exclude "AI users" from their community here mean that to include these groups, as well.

                                  you are trans. i am interested in your point of view on this.

                                  revoltergeist@sunny.gardenR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dgodon@mastodon.onlineD dgodon@mastodon.online

                                    @toddsundsted @scottjenson @Gargron "AI people" is a very vague group. Quite a bit of AI discussion is hype and mis/dis-info and I don't think needs to be coddled here (just as we shouldn't tolerate puppy killers or fascists, even if they're from marginalized groups). Tho there are many shades of gray and I think it's also fair to say some AI discussion is non-hype/mis/dis-info. But my main point is that welcoming marginalized groups should be the focus, not opinions about AI

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Guest
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #182

                                    @dgodon

                                    >  But my main point is that welcoming marginalized groups should be the focus, not opinions about AI

                                    i am very very much in alignment with this.

                                    scottjenson@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cratermoon@zirk.usC cratermoon@zirk.us

                                      @scottjenson @Gargron I'd have to ask, what value would an an AI Booster community bring to the FediVerse?

                                      jaykass@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jaykass@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jaykass@mastodon.online
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #183

                                      @cratermoon @scottjenson @Gargron
                                      “AI” isn’t even a thing. It’s an all encompassing marketing term. It’s meaningless.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                                        Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

                                        I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        awfulwoman@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        awfulwoman@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        awfulwoman@indieweb.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #184

                                        @scottjenson @carnage4life Not sure anyone is particularly shouting for journalists to join? Like, I've not found myself gagging for them to spice up a conversation.

                                        Numbers down? Maybe people have figured out that social media is bad for their mental health?

                                        scottjenson@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                                          As this conversation is spiraling a bit I want to make a few things clear:
                                          1. I'd like Mastodon to be MORE inclusive and bring in more voices
                                          2. Some people don't seem to want that
                                          3. This is core problem to solve: How do we let more in, but not "pollute" your feed?
                                          4. The solution is NOT "gatekeeping", revelling in the fact that AI journalists aren't welcome
                                          5. This is the same reason we lost "Black Twitter" when it came over in 2022

                                          Yes, a lot of you don't want AI posts in your feed (or pick any other topic) but the solution isn't to keep "AI People" from joining Mastodon, any more than it is keeping marginalized communities off of Mastodon.

                                          codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #185

                                          @scottjenson ironically this is far too nuanced and complex of a discussion to have on a “roughly one para and maybe a pic” social network platform. This has to be blogged. Seriously.

                                          scottjenson@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups