Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. bug of the day: a memcmp that only compares every fourth byte

bug of the day: a memcmp that only compares every fourth byte

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
25 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • marzhall@app.wafrn.netM marzhall@app.wafrn.net

    @dysfun@social.treehouse.systems @gsuberland@chaos.social

    Hmm… is the issue casting 64-bit memory to an 8-bit char?

    gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gsuberland@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @marzhall @dysfun 32-bit, but yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

      bug of the day: a memcmp that only compares every fourth byte

      gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gsuberland@chaos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      i blogged about the memcmp thing

      Watch out for missed warnings on vendor C++ toolchains - Graham Sutherland's Blog

      favicon

      (blog.poly.nomial.co.uk)

      mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM reverseics@infosec.exchangeR 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      0
      • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

        i blogged about the memcmp thing

        Watch out for missed warnings on vendor C++ toolchains - Graham Sutherland's Blog

        favicon

        (blog.poly.nomial.co.uk)

        mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
        mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
        mildsunrise@tech.lgbt
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @gsuberland unrelated but shouldn't it be something like *(a++) ^ *(b++)?

        gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM mildsunrise@tech.lgbt

          @gsuberland unrelated but shouldn't it be something like *(a++) ^ *(b++)?

          gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gsuberland@chaos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @mildsunrise probably yeah I'm tired lol

          gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

            @mildsunrise probably yeah I'm tired lol

            gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gsuberland@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @mildsunrise wait no, cos (a++) would be equivalent to pre-increment

            gsuberland@chaos.socialG mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

              @mildsunrise wait no, cos (a++) would be equivalent to pre-increment

              gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gsuberland@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @mildsunrise but yeah it should be *a ^ *b and then separately incrementing

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                @mildsunrise wait no, cos (a++) would be equivalent to pre-increment

                mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                mildsunrise@tech.lgbt
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @gsuberland (a++) is post increment, pre increment would be (++a)

                gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM mildsunrise@tech.lgbt

                  @gsuberland (a++) is post increment, pre increment would be (++a)

                  gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gsuberland@chaos.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @mildsunrise if you wrap it in brackets and deref outside doesn't it turn into pre behaviour regardless? (now I'm writing this I'm realising it probably doesn't, but this is c++ so principle of most surprise applies lol)

                  gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                    @mildsunrise if you wrap it in brackets and deref outside doesn't it turn into pre behaviour regardless? (now I'm writing this I'm realising it probably doesn't, but this is c++ so principle of most surprise applies lol)

                    gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gsuberland@chaos.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @mildsunrise yeah nah I'm just tiiired

                    mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                      @mildsunrise yeah nah I'm just tiiired

                      mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mildsunrise@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mildsunrise@tech.lgbt
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @gsuberland dw, relatable

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                        i blogged about the memcmp thing

                        Watch out for missed warnings on vendor C++ toolchains - Graham Sutherland's Blog

                        favicon

                        (blog.poly.nomial.co.uk)

                        reverseics@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                        reverseics@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                        reverseics@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @gsuberland i'm reminded of a weird bug i found in a compiler. in this case the vendor (green hills c compiler for coldfire cpus) converted a sequence like this:

                        ```uint8_t idx;
                        idx = ;
                        char newbyte = lookup_table[idx];

                        The code was converting upper/lowercase letters iirc.

                        In this case the compiler actually converted idx to a signed value using a coldfire MVS.B instruction for some reason, so you could obtain values outside of the lookup table array if the user input a byte >= 0x80.

                        Not incredibly useful on its own in the app I was analyzing, but the bug was in the compiler itself so needed to be fixed...I never would have spotted the bug were it not for using Ida back in the day.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups