Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmgenaiacademiaresearchresearchintegri
37 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

    kunev@blewsky.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kunev@blewsky.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kunev@blewsky.social
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org the "reasercher"'s name Lazljiv Izgubljenovic to a speaker of most slavic languages would read sort of like "Lying Loser" 😆😆😆

    elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE oranger@piaille.frO 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • kunev@blewsky.socialK kunev@blewsky.social

      @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org the "reasercher"'s name Lazljiv Izgubljenovic to a speaker of most slavic languages would read sort of like "Lying Loser" 😆😆😆

      elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
      elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
      elenlefoll@fediscience.org
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @kunev Brilliant! I have to say I really do think that the real author did an excellent job all round!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

        grimblob@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grimblob@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grimblob@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @ElenLeFoll as a lifelong sufferer of Bixonimania (undiagnosed by any medical professional) I find this article offensive. ChatGPT told me that I asked a really excellent question when I asked if I had Bixonimania, so there.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

          pineywoozle@masto.aiP This user is from outside of this forum
          pineywoozle@masto.aiP This user is from outside of this forum
          pineywoozle@masto.ai
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @ElenLeFoll I love this quote about the original article. “Acknowledgments also thanked “Professor Sideshow Bob” and a professor from the Starfleet Academy for access to a lab aboard the USS Enterprise” 🤣 🤣 🤣 #AI #AiSlop

          czarbucks@vmst.ioC naturemc@mastodon.onlineN markiejiang@mastodon.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

            djm62@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
            djm62@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
            djm62@beige.party
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @ElenLeFoll Chris Morris would be proud:

            Just a moment...

            favicon

            (publications.parliament.uk)

            Link Preview Image
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

              I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

              #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

              meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
              meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
              meneerdebruin@mastodon.nl
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @ElenLeFoll Good. Poison as much as possible, let it eat its own crap and dance while it burns to the ground.

              naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pa27@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @ElenLeFoll Yes, saw this at the time - but it's good to remind everyone of what comes out of artificial idiocy LLMs!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                  I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                  #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                  seharinsights@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  seharinsights@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  seharinsights@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @ElenLeFoll incredible post

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pineywoozle@masto.aiP pineywoozle@masto.ai

                    @ElenLeFoll I love this quote about the original article. “Acknowledgments also thanked “Professor Sideshow Bob” and a professor from the Starfleet Academy for access to a lab aboard the USS Enterprise” 🤣 🤣 🤣 #AI #AiSlop

                    czarbucks@vmst.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    czarbucks@vmst.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    czarbucks@vmst.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @Pineywoozle @ElenLeFoll

                    Wow. It couldn't be more obvious, but this dreck is infiltrating *everything.*

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                      mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

                      a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

                      that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
                      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                        kolya@social.cologneK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kolya@social.cologneK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kolya@social.cologne
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @ElenLeFoll that iMac is approaching his 30s. he's earned the right to be a hypochondriac sometimes.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kunev@blewsky.socialK kunev@blewsky.social

                          @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org the "reasercher"'s name Lazljiv Izgubljenovic to a speaker of most slavic languages would read sort of like "Lying Loser" 😆😆😆

                          oranger@piaille.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oranger@piaille.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oranger@piaille.fr
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @ElenLeFoll @kunev
                          😂
                          🎯

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                            savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @ElenLeFoll

                            Some do it, DELIBERATELY with a lot of other subjects too. AI is amoral especially if the material it is fed is amoral and we know a lot of those tech guys and politicians ARE amoral.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl

                              @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

                              a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

                              that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

                              urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                              urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                              urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @mkljczk @ElenLeFoll
                              Good point.

                              Google, if Gemini is as useful as you hope it will be, it is inevitable that it will just come to be known as "Google" and AI answers to direct questions is just a feature of Google search.

                              Google, if Gemini is unreliable and can not be reliable, why are you letting it tarnish your brand?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • bms48@mastodon.socialB bms48@mastodon.social

                                @ElenLeFoll Yeah that's totally getting ingested into my Zotero along with all the other corroborating evidence for "The only way is down". But to falsify I am looking at what working code generation studies there actually are.

                                mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mycotropic@beige.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @bms48 @ElenLeFoll

                                Johnathan Swift described The Machine (for writing) in 1726; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Engine

                                nev@flipping.rocksN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mycotropic@beige.party
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @bencourtice @FediThing @ElenLeFoll

                                  We have a whole module on how to cite and also how AI works (ethics, errors, foundational knowledge, all that) for our freshman public health students. We STILL had over 10% academic affairs referrals for using hidden prompts and hallucinated citations and that's with a requirement that they give us annotated PDF copies of every cited paper.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                    j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    j12i@weirder.earth
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    boost with CN: "AI"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                      savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @ElenLeFoll

                                      The obvious end goal of AI is centralized control of information that can be used to bend public opinion, win elections for pedophiles, criminals and set trends.

                                      Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                                      favicon

                                      (cybernews.com)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                        villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        villavelius@mastodon.online
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @ElenLeFoll LLMs, like seagulls, swallow anything that's thrown at them. It's known as 'gullibility' for a good reason.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grimalkina@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @ElenLeFoll I'm sorry, they put up fake preprints and then said other researchers citing these preprints are the problem? Standing up a fake preprint is absurdly unethical

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups