Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The ProPublica piece is kind of a mess - it doesn't even mention CISA by name - but some of the issues are concerning.

The ProPublica piece is kind of a mess - it doesn't even mention CISA by name - but some of the issues are concerning.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
34 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • billmcguire@mastodon.socialB billmcguire@mastodon.social

    @mattblaze

    well, considering Musk had people monkey with the voting machines a month or so b4 the 2024 election, I'd love to see us all vote on paper ballots that are hand counted 10 times if that's what it takes to have a fair election.

    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.social
    wrote last edited by
    #24

    @BillMcGuire Sorry, that “Musk rigged the voting machines” story is a fantasy, supported by neither evidence nor even a theory for how it would have worked.

    Please don’t spread bullshit about elections. It doesn’t help anyone.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      RE: https://esq.social/@SuffolkLITLab/116229521620498862

      The ProPublica piece is kind of a mess - it doesn't even mention CISA by name - but some of the issues are concerning. In particular, the proposals are extremely vague.

      They want to ban "voting machines" (under what authority?). Does that mean touchscreen DREs? Fine, that's what virtually all technical experts have recommended for a while. Or do they mean any electronic tabulation, including optical scan paper ballots (widely used and amenable to reliable post-election audits)?

      di4na@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      di4na@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      di4na@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #25

      @mattblaze tbf, I am shocked that CISA has still enough resources to put out anything at all. They took a really heavy hit

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

        RE: https://esq.social/@SuffolkLITLab/116229521620498862

        The ProPublica piece is kind of a mess - it doesn't even mention CISA by name - but some of the issues are concerning. In particular, the proposals are extremely vague.

        They want to ban "voting machines" (under what authority?). Does that mean touchscreen DREs? Fine, that's what virtually all technical experts have recommended for a while. Or do they mean any electronic tabulation, including optical scan paper ballots (widely used and amenable to reliable post-election audits)?

        endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        endicottauthor@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #26

        @mattblaze The GOP, through it's many surrogates, does whatever it can to make voting more difficult for everyone. That way, it's easier for them to CHEAT.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

          Finally, "whether your candidate won" is not a meaningful test for election fraud.

          sellathechemist@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sellathechemist@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sellathechemist@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #27

          @mattblaze It reminds me of the changing room talk when I was eight years old after gym class where "you cheated" was always the talking point. Unfortunately when it comes to elections it's deadly serious.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.social
            wrote last edited by
            #28

            @lin11c the people you’re citing are election deniers who are raising money to “prove” that the 2024 election was rigged. They’re suckering statistically unsophisticated Harris supporters with nonsensical but complex pseudo mathematical bullshit.

            Please don’t promote this stuff.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

              Also, it's simply too late to make any major changes to election systems this year. Primaries have already started, and the general election is in eight months.

              I think it's reasonable to suspect that the play here is simply to set the stage for casting doubt on election outcomes that they regard as unfavorable.

              mattdm@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
              mattdm@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
              mattdm@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #29

              @mattblaze

              I hope you're right. I'm afraid the play will be to issue an 11th-hour executive order claiming some such authority (maybe nominally based on some obscure law or ruling that had never been interpreted like that before). Then tie everything up in state legislatures, courts, and chaos.

              mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mattdm@hachyderm.ioM mattdm@hachyderm.io

                @mattblaze

                I hope you're right. I'm afraid the play will be to issue an 11th-hour executive order claiming some such authority (maybe nominally based on some obscure law or ruling that had never been interpreted like that before). Then tie everything up in state legislatures, courts, and chaos.

                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mattblaze@federate.social
                wrote last edited by
                #30

                @mattdm maybe they have MAGICAL POWERS, too.

                Trying to stick to what we actually know here.

                mattdm@hachyderm.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • eka_foof_a@spacey.spaceE eka_foof_a@spacey.space

                  @mattblaze
                  There are people in TX who recorded the touchscreen voting machines recording votes to candidates they didn't touch the buttons for.

                  mattdm@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mattdm@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mattdm@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #31

                  @Eka_FOOF_A @mattblaze

                  Eka, you should read this https://www.npr.org/2016/10/26/499450796/some-machines-are-flipping-votes-but-that-doesnt-mean-theyre-rigged

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • eka_foof_a@spacey.spaceE eka_foof_a@spacey.space

                    @mattblaze
                    There are people in TX who recorded the touchscreen voting machines recording votes to candidates they didn't touch the buttons for.

                    thatprilla@theatl.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thatprilla@theatl.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thatprilla@theatl.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #32

                    @Eka_FOOF_A @mattblaze

                    So a miscalibrated touchscreen? Happens and should be brought to the attention of the staff at the precinct. They also saw that it selected the wrong candidate.

                    It’s also why should check what prints out on the paper ballot once it prints and if you see an issue bring it to the attention of the precinct staff.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                      @mattdm maybe they have MAGICAL POWERS, too.

                      Trying to stick to what we actually know here.

                      mattdm@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattdm@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattdm@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #33

                      @mattblaze

                      Well, we know that they _claim_ magical powers all the time over other things — birthright citizenship, tariffs, whether someone is "entering" the US. If it were as simple as "they don't really have those powers so it won't be a problem"... well, it clearly isn't.

                      Trump has talked more than once about cancelling the election. (https://time.com/7346834/trump-canceling-midterm-elections-joking-white-house/). Is it a "joke"? Well... I think this puts it well: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/07/19/donald-trump-joking-serious-00442035

                      We can't _know_, but he _has_ put it on the table.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #34

                        @lin11c no, I am not saying that particular statement is false. But they are grifters who are using fake statistics to claim that the 2024 election was stolen and raising money for lawsuits that give false hope to Harris supporters.

                        What a weird response.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups