oh, oh, oh!

[eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place]

RE: https://mastodon.social/@glynmoody/116571813410114171

oh, oh, oh! i know the solution to this one! you just pass legislation banning seniors from social media rather than legislating the actual platforms!

[matildalove@wetdry.world]

@eniko i know the solution to this but i don't want to get my instance subpoenad

[eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place]

funny how absurd it sounds when you replace "kids" with "seniors" huh

[gabboman@gabboman.xyz]

@eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

Actually it is a great idea

[ratsnakegames@mastodon.social]

@eniko people get soooo pissy when anybody suggests, like, forcing seniors to take physical fitness exams every 5 years if they want to keep driving cars

[ratsnakegames@mastodon.social]

@eniko i think politicians treat elders as sacrosanct because a) elders can vote, children cannot and b) politicians may become elders some day but they're never gonna become children

[ratsnakegames@mastodon.social]

@eniko in conclusion, society will be fixed by my de-aging ray

[landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@eniko Luckily for everyone involved, we have awesome, totally privacy-preserving, and definitely not profit-oriented age verification technology for exactly this, ripe for the taking!

[spacebug@n3.mikronod.se]

@eniko
then the only ones allowed to be on Metas platforms are 16-18 years old, and they do not want to be there. Great solution

[ozzelot@mstdn.social]

@ratsnakegames
The kid-inator!
@eniko

[farbs@mastodon.social]

@eniko Or you acknowledge that putting anything in a person's feed amounts to publishing, so if someone you follow posts then yep fair game they're responsible for that, but every fxking ad or algo post or YouTube recommendation the buck stops with the website.