Only partly through this, but quick signals you should be wary:
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@webstandards_dev/116453439046874930
Only partly through this, but quick signals you should be wary:
• conflates Deque’s marketing claim of issues with WCAG SCs;
• has a rule for dynamic `aria-label`;
• promotes labeling *all* landmarks;
• no outbound references (like how to use a SR, spec refs, etc.)
• no way to leave comments.
My concern is that automating only works if you encode the right rules.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@webstandards_dev/116453439046874930
Only partly through this, but quick signals you should be wary:
• conflates Deque’s marketing claim of issues with WCAG SCs;
• has a rule for dynamic `aria-label`;
• promotes labeling *all* landmarks;
• no outbound references (like how to use a SR, spec refs, etc.)
• no way to leave comments.
My concern is that automating only works if you encode the right rules.
My own refs (which allow comments, link out to other resources):
• Deque claim: https://adrianroselli.com/2022/07/what-does-x-of-issues-mean.html
• dynamic accName: https://adrianroselli.com/2020/12/be-careful-with-dynamic-accessible-names.html
• landmark naming: https://adrianroselli.com/2024/06/maybe-dont-name-that-landmark.html
• refs for using SRs (anchor): https://adrianroselli.com/2022/11/your-accessibility-claims-are-wrong-unless.html#SRs
-
P pixelate@tweesecake.social shared this topic