Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit?

Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
76 Posts 62 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

    Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

    SpaceX is truly awful.

    frieke72@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    frieke72@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    frieke72@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #34

    @sundogplanets maybe @georgemonbiot.bsky.social is interested (Topic Environment and starlink pollution)?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

      Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

      SpaceX is truly awful.

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      tantvnews@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #35

      @sundogplanets would you be interested in writing an OP-ED on this for tantvnews.com?

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

        Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

        SpaceX is truly awful.

        retrosponge@kind.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        retrosponge@kind.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        retrosponge@kind.social
        wrote last edited by
        #36

        @sundogplanets I remember when I was a kid you looked up in the sky and seeing a satellite was something cool and unusual.😕

        rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T tantvnews@mastodon.social

          @sundogplanets would you be interested in writing an OP-ED on this for tantvnews.com?

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #37

          @Tantvnews I've co-authored two in the last few weeks about satellite pollution in general that can be reprinted CC-BY, and I am writing another one. I don't have time to write one specifically for you, sorry.

          Link Preview Image
          Too many satellites? Earth’s orbit is on track for a catastrophe – but we can stop it

          Cultural, spiritual, and most environmental impacts aren’t taken into account when launching thousands of satellites.

          favicon

          The Conversation (theconversation.com)

          Link Preview Image
          A new space race could turn our atmosphere into a ‘crematorium for satellites’

          Planned ‘megaconstellations’ of satellites could cause unforeseen harm to the ozone layer and climate systems. Global regulation is needed before it’s too late.

          favicon

          The Conversation (theconversation.com)

          Link Preview Image
          Republishing guidelines and Creative Commons license for articles | The Conversation

          News websites, newspapers, magazines and anyone else can use our articles for free under this Creative Commons license and simple rules. It's high-quality, expert-written free content.

          favicon

          The Conversation (theconversation.com)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • foxxtrot@dice.campF foxxtrot@dice.camp

            @simon @sundogplanets IPO on June 9. Gotta get all the material out to ensure this is a massive flop by then.

            legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL This user is from outside of this forum
            legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL This user is from outside of this forum
            legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al
            wrote last edited by
            #38

            @foxxtrot @simon @sundogplanets That's a really good insight. If enough people raise hell and the IPO crashes and burns (much like their stupid satellites), that would be a DELIGHTFUL way to end this nonsense.

            foxxtrot@dice.campF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al

              @foxxtrot @simon @sundogplanets That's a really good insight. If enough people raise hell and the IPO crashes and burns (much like their stupid satellites), that would be a DELIGHTFUL way to end this nonsense.

              foxxtrot@dice.campF This user is from outside of this forum
              foxxtrot@dice.campF This user is from outside of this forum
              foxxtrot@dice.camp
              wrote last edited by
              #39

              @Legit_Spaghetti Sadly, I suspect there are enough Marks, hoodwinked by Musk, that the IPO won't be a *complete* disaster (though their projected valuation is outright lunacy), but here's hoping it's a flop that destroys the Cult of Musk forever.

              mtnrbq65@social.vivaldi.netM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alexf24@mstdn.socialA alexf24@mstdn.social

                @sundogplanets I am worried that at some point it could create a Kessler Effect

                Link Preview Image
                Kessler syndrome - Wikipedia

                favicon

                (en.wikipedia.org)

                stevefoerster@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                stevefoerster@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                stevefoerster@social.vivaldi.net
                wrote last edited by
                #40

                @alexf24 @sundogplanets Yeah, I'm not really worried about reentry given how small each one is, but this is a much more pressing concern.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • retrosponge@kind.socialR retrosponge@kind.social

                  @sundogplanets I remember when I was a kid you looked up in the sky and seeing a satellite was something cool and unusual.😕

                  rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #41

                  @retrosponge @sundogplanets

                  I remember... I used to take my binoculars and head out into the middle of nowhere to catch glimpses of the ISS when it was still new.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dirkhh@hachyderm.ioD dirkhh@hachyderm.io

                    @sundogplanets
                    Truly awful. And also on track to pull off a nice heist of everyone's retirement savings. Accelerated entry into the indexes, weighted at 5x actual float. Which means every passive index fund that doesn't exclude mega-caps will be forced to buy a ton of that garbage...

                    Link Preview Image
                    Michael Burry Flags 'Structural Manipulation' Risk In Nasdaq Rules Ahead Of Potential SpaceX Listing

                    Michael Burry slams Nasdaq's proposed rule changes that could fast-track SpaceX into the Nasdaq-100 just 15 days after its IPO, warning of forced passive buying and insider wealth transfer at the expense of retail investors.

                    favicon

                    Sahm (www.sahmcapital.com)

                    apologies for the YouTube link... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rS3fTbC7TE

                    salixsericea@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    salixsericea@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    salixsericea@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #42

                    @dirkhh Thank you for surfacing this. The numbers by Patrick Boyle in the youtube video are breathtaking.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                      Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                      SpaceX is truly awful.

                      svans@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      svans@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      svans@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #43

                      @sundogplanets What are you talking about?!😁 During bombings in ground wars, there are far more pieces of metal!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                        Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                        SpaceX is truly awful.

                        nindelofocho@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nindelofocho@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nindelofocho@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #44

                        @sundogplanets I do wonder how much research/consideration typically goes into the impact of orbital structures burning up in the atmosphere when a company or organization is designing something to be put into orbit.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • drewtowler@mas.toD drewtowler@mas.to

                          @johnlogic When I bought my Starlink kit, I could not get either of those. Having invested in that kit, I'm obviously not going to ditch it. Not to mention the time spent routing cables through walls and roof voids. So whether I can _now_ get ViaSat or HughesNet is immaterial.
                          EDIT: On checking, Viasat and HughesNet have completely unacceptable latency anyway.

                          johnlogic@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          johnlogic@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          johnlogic@sfba.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #45

                          @drewtowler ViaSat and HughesNet use few satellites in geostationary orbits, which are higher than the many disposable satellites that Starlink uses in low Earth orbit.

                          I've tried VoIP over a GEO system and the latency caused it to be marginal at best. But the latency wasn't an issue for most other uses.

                          drewtowler@mas.toD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                            Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                            SpaceX is truly awful.

                            lstn2urmama@mstdn.caL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lstn2urmama@mstdn.caL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lstn2urmama@mstdn.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #46

                            @sundogplanets heard that there are 77,000 of them up there chaining in Earth or is it CAGING Earth ...🤨😡

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                              Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                              SpaceX is truly awful.

                              x41h@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                              x41h@infosec.exchangeX This user is from outside of this forum
                              x41h@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #47

                              @sundogplanets Sure. Ill write it. Headline will be:

                              "Starlink: From Space to Your Face"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                                Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                                SpaceX is truly awful.

                                alterelefant@mastodontech.deA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alterelefant@mastodontech.deA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alterelefant@mastodontech.de
                                wrote last edited by
                                #48

                                @sundogplanets

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • hundhamm@muenchen.socialH hundhamm@muenchen.social

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  Already done:
                                  https://magazin.tu-braunschweig.de/en/m-post/burned-up-satellite-debris-could-deplete-ozone-layer/

                                  hiisikoloart@writing.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hiisikoloart@writing.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hiisikoloart@writing.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #49

                                  @hundhamm @sundogplanets
                                  It is so painful since didn't we fix the hole in the ozone just a little while back and now this absolute troglodyte billionare is like, "Hold my beer, I can fuck that up faster than the industries before me."

                                  Every billionare should lose first their wealth and then their freedom, and finally their ability to breathe for the crimes they have commited against everyone and everything on this planet.

                                  hundhamm@muenchen.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • foxxtrot@dice.campF foxxtrot@dice.camp

                                    @simon @sundogplanets IPO on June 9. Gotta get all the material out to ensure this is a massive flop by then.

                                    stonsoftware@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stonsoftware@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stonsoftware@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #50

                                    @foxxtrot @simon @sundogplanets I’m not sure that will work. Starlink is ideal for billionaires and criminals to avoid regulation and taxation.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • hiisikoloart@writing.exchangeH hiisikoloart@writing.exchange

                                      @hundhamm @sundogplanets
                                      It is so painful since didn't we fix the hole in the ozone just a little while back and now this absolute troglodyte billionare is like, "Hold my beer, I can fuck that up faster than the industries before me."

                                      Every billionare should lose first their wealth and then their freedom, and finally their ability to breathe for the crimes they have commited against everyone and everything on this planet.

                                      hundhamm@muenchen.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hundhamm@muenchen.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hundhamm@muenchen.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #51

                                      @hiisikoloart
                                      @sundogplanets

                                      Painful, yes.

                                      But it’s all of us.

                                      Of course China will want a global network. And Europe will want a free internet as well—only for self-defense.

                                      We are killing ourselves with dead dinosaurs and communication debris.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • johnlogic@sfba.socialJ johnlogic@sfba.social

                                        @drewtowler ViaSat and HughesNet use few satellites in geostationary orbits, which are higher than the many disposable satellites that Starlink uses in low Earth orbit.

                                        I've tried VoIP over a GEO system and the latency caused it to be marginal at best. But the latency wasn't an issue for most other uses.

                                        drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        drewtowler@mas.to
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #52

                                        @johnlogic It would be unworkable for me.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • foxxtrot@dice.campF foxxtrot@dice.camp

                                          @Legit_Spaghetti Sadly, I suspect there are enough Marks, hoodwinked by Musk, that the IPO won't be a *complete* disaster (though their projected valuation is outright lunacy), but here's hoping it's a flop that destroys the Cult of Musk forever.

                                          mtnrbq65@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mtnrbq65@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mtnrbq65@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #53

                                          @foxxtrot @Legit_Spaghetti
                                          An interesting video on this:
                                          https://youtu.be/8rS3fTbC7TE?si=D646-604YSfluhuv

                                          Tldw: changes to SEC listing rules could make all index tracking funds have to purchase SpaceX shares at insane valuation

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups